1
0
mirror of https://git.tartarus.org/simon/putty.git synced 2025-01-09 17:38:00 +00:00
putty-source/cmdgen.c

1185 lines
38 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* cmdgen.c - command-line form of PuTTYgen
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <limits.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <string.h>
#include "putty.h"
#include "ssh.h"
#include "sshkeygen.h"
#include "mpint.h"
static FILE *progress_fp = NULL;
static bool linear_progress_phase;
static unsigned last_progress_col;
static ProgressPhase cmdgen_progress_add_linear(
ProgressReceiver *prog, double c)
{
ProgressPhase ph = { .n = 0 };
return ph;
}
static ProgressPhase cmdgen_progress_add_probabilistic(
ProgressReceiver *prog, double c, double p)
{
ProgressPhase ph = { .n = 1 };
return ph;
}
static void cmdgen_progress_start_phase(ProgressReceiver *prog,
ProgressPhase p)
{
linear_progress_phase = (p.n == 0);
last_progress_col = 0;
}
static void cmdgen_progress_report(ProgressReceiver *prog, double p)
{
unsigned new_col = p * 64 + 0.5;
for (; last_progress_col < new_col; last_progress_col++)
fputc('+', progress_fp);
}
static void cmdgen_progress_report_attempt(ProgressReceiver *prog)
{
if (progress_fp) {
fputc('+', progress_fp);
fflush(progress_fp);
}
}
static void cmdgen_progress_report_phase_complete(ProgressReceiver *prog)
{
if (linear_progress_phase)
cmdgen_progress_report(prog, 1.0);
if (progress_fp) {
fputc('\n', progress_fp);
fflush(progress_fp);
}
}
static const ProgressReceiverVtable cmdgen_progress_vt = {
cmdgen_progress_add_linear,
cmdgen_progress_add_probabilistic,
null_progress_ready,
cmdgen_progress_start_phase,
cmdgen_progress_report,
cmdgen_progress_report_attempt,
cmdgen_progress_report_phase_complete,
};
static ProgressReceiver cmdgen_progress = { .vt = &cmdgen_progress_vt };
/*
* Stubs to let everything else link sensibly.
*/
char *x_get_default(const char *key)
{
return NULL;
}
void sk_cleanup(void)
{
}
void showversion(void)
{
char *buildinfo_text = buildinfo("\n");
printf("puttygen: %s\n%s\n", ver, buildinfo_text);
sfree(buildinfo_text);
}
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 19:23:19 +00:00
void usage(bool standalone)
{
fprintf(standalone ? stderr : stdout,
"Usage: puttygen ( keyfile | -t type [ -b bits ] )\n"
" [ -C comment ] [ -P ] [ -q ]\n"
" [ -o output-keyfile ] [ -O type | -l | -L"
" | -p ]\n");
if (standalone)
fprintf(stderr,
"Use \"puttygen --help\" for more detail.\n");
}
void help(void)
{
/*
* Help message is an extended version of the usage message. So
* start with that, plus a version heading.
*/
printf("PuTTYgen: key generator and converter for the PuTTY tools\n"
"%s\n", ver);
usage(false);
printf(" -t specify key type when generating (ed25519, ecdsa, rsa, "
"dsa, rsa1)\n"
" -b specify number of bits when generating key\n"
" -C change or specify key comment\n"
" -P change key passphrase\n"
" -q quiet: do not display progress bar\n"
" -O specify output type:\n"
" private output PuTTY private key format\n"
" private-openssh export OpenSSH private key\n"
" private-openssh-new export OpenSSH private key "
"(force new format)\n"
" private-sshcom export ssh.com private key\n"
" public RFC 4716 / ssh.com public key\n"
" public-openssh OpenSSH public key\n"
" fingerprint output the key fingerprint\n"
" text output the key components as "
"'name=0x####'\n"
" -o specify output file\n"
" -l equivalent to `-O fingerprint'\n"
" -L equivalent to `-O public-openssh'\n"
" -p equivalent to `-O public'\n"
" --dump equivalent to `-O text'\n"
" --old-passphrase file\n"
" specify file containing old key passphrase\n"
" --new-passphrase file\n"
" specify file containing new key passphrase\n"
" --random-device device\n"
" specify device to read entropy from (e.g. /dev/urandom)\n"
);
}
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 19:23:19 +00:00
static bool move(char *from, char *to)
{
int ret;
ret = rename(from, to);
if (ret) {
/*
* This OS may require us to remove the original file first.
*/
remove(to);
ret = rename(from, to);
}
if (ret) {
perror("puttygen: cannot move new file on to old one");
return false;
}
return true;
}
static char *readpassphrase(const char *filename)
{
FILE *fp;
char *line;
fp = fopen(filename, "r");
if (!fp) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: cannot open %s: %s\n",
filename, strerror(errno));
return NULL;
}
line = fgetline(fp);
if (line)
line[strcspn(line, "\r\n")] = '\0';
else if (ferror(fp))
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: error reading from %s: %s\n",
filename, strerror(errno));
else /* empty file */
line = dupstr("");
fclose(fp);
return line;
}
#define DEFAULT_RSADSA_BITS 2048
/* For Unix in particular, but harmless if this main() is reused elsewhere */
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 19:23:19 +00:00
const bool buildinfo_gtk_relevant = false;
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char *infile = NULL;
Filename *infilename = NULL, *outfilename = NULL;
LoadedFile *infile_lf = NULL;
BinarySource *infile_bs = NULL;
enum { NOKEYGEN, RSA1, RSA2, DSA, ECDSA, ED25519 } keytype = NOKEYGEN;
char *outfile = NULL, *outfiletmp = NULL;
enum { PRIVATE, PUBLIC, PUBLICO, FP, OPENSSH_AUTO,
OPENSSH_NEW, SSHCOM, TEXT } outtype = PRIVATE;
int bits = -1;
const char *comment = NULL;
char *origcomment = NULL;
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 19:23:19 +00:00
bool change_passphrase = false;
bool errs = false, nogo = false;
int intype = SSH_KEYTYPE_UNOPENABLE;
int sshver = 0;
ssh2_userkey *ssh2key = NULL;
RSAKey *ssh1key = NULL;
strbuf *ssh2blob = NULL;
char *ssh2alg = NULL;
char *old_passphrase = NULL, *new_passphrase = NULL;
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 19:23:19 +00:00
bool load_encrypted;
const char *random_device = NULL;
int exit_status = 0;
if (is_interactive())
progress_fp = stderr;
#define RETURN(status) do { exit_status = (status); goto out; } while (0)
/* ------------------------------------------------------------------
* Parse the command line to figure out what we've been asked to do.
*/
/*
* If run with no arguments at all, print the usage message and
* return success.
*/
if (argc <= 1) {
usage(true);
RETURN(0);
}
/*
* Parse command line arguments.
*/
while (--argc) {
char *p = *++argv;
if (p[0] == '-' && p[1]) {
/*
* An option.
*/
while (p && *++p) {
char c = *p;
switch (c) {
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch. Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now I've mostly been writing this in the form switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; } break; } which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get! After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks more like this: switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; break; } } This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is relieved. (Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the initialiser clause of its for statement.) Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change. Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 07:49:52 +00:00
case '-': {
/*
* Long option.
*/
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch. Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now I've mostly been writing this in the form switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; } break; } which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get! After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks more like this: switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; break; } } This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is relieved. (Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the initialiser clause of its for statement.) Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change. Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 07:49:52 +00:00
char *opt, *val;
opt = p++; /* opt will have _one_ leading - */
while (*p && *p != '=')
p++; /* find end of option */
if (*p == '=') {
*p++ = '\0';
val = p;
} else
val = NULL;
if (!strcmp(opt, "-help")) {
if (val) {
errs = true;
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: option `-%s'"
" expects no argument\n", opt);
} else {
help();
nogo = true;
}
} else if (!strcmp(opt, "-version")) {
if (val) {
errs = true;
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: option `-%s'"
" expects no argument\n", opt);
} else {
showversion();
nogo = true;
}
} else if (!strcmp(opt, "-pgpfp")) {
if (val) {
errs = true;
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: option `-%s'"
" expects no argument\n", opt);
} else {
/* support --pgpfp for consistency */
pgp_fingerprints();
nogo = true;
}
} else if (!strcmp(opt, "-old-passphrase")) {
if (!val && argc > 1)
--argc, val = *++argv;
if (!val) {
errs = true;
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: option `-%s'"
" expects an argument\n", opt);
} else {
old_passphrase = readpassphrase(val);
if (!old_passphrase)
errs = true;
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch. Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now I've mostly been writing this in the form switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; } break; } which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get! After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks more like this: switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; break; } } This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is relieved. (Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the initialiser clause of its for statement.) Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change. Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 07:49:52 +00:00
}
} else if (!strcmp(opt, "-new-passphrase")) {
if (!val && argc > 1)
--argc, val = *++argv;
if (!val) {
errs = true;
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: option `-%s'"
" expects an argument\n", opt);
} else {
new_passphrase = readpassphrase(val);
if (!new_passphrase)
errs = true;
}
} else if (!strcmp(opt, "-random-device")) {
if (!val && argc > 1)
--argc, val = *++argv;
if (!val) {
errs = true;
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: option `-%s'"
" expects an argument\n", opt);
} else {
random_device = val;
}
} else if (!strcmp(opt, "-dump")) {
outtype = TEXT;
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch. Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now I've mostly been writing this in the form switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; } break; } which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get! After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks more like this: switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; break; } } This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is relieved. (Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the initialiser clause of its for statement.) Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change. Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 07:49:52 +00:00
} else {
errs = true;
fprintf(stderr,
"puttygen: no such option `-%s'\n", opt);
}
p = NULL;
break;
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch. Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now I've mostly been writing this in the form switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; } break; } which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get! After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks more like this: switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; break; } } This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is relieved. (Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the initialiser clause of its for statement.) Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change. Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 07:49:52 +00:00
}
case 'h':
case 'V':
case 'P':
case 'l':
case 'L':
case 'p':
case 'q':
/*
* Option requiring no parameter.
*/
switch (c) {
case 'h':
help();
nogo = true;
break;
case 'V':
showversion();
nogo = true;
break;
case 'P':
change_passphrase = true;
break;
case 'l':
outtype = FP;
break;
case 'L':
outtype = PUBLICO;
break;
case 'p':
outtype = PUBLIC;
break;
case 'q':
progress_fp = NULL;
break;
}
break;
case 't':
case 'b':
case 'C':
case 'O':
case 'o':
/*
* Option requiring parameter.
*/
p++;
if (!*p && argc > 1)
--argc, p = *++argv;
else if (!*p) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: option `-%c' expects a"
" parameter\n", c);
errs = true;
}
/*
* Now c is the option and p is the parameter.
*/
switch (c) {
case 't':
if (!strcmp(p, "rsa") || !strcmp(p, "rsa2"))
keytype = RSA2, sshver = 2;
else if (!strcmp(p, "rsa1"))
keytype = RSA1, sshver = 1;
else if (!strcmp(p, "dsa") || !strcmp(p, "dss"))
keytype = DSA, sshver = 2;
else if (!strcmp(p, "ecdsa"))
keytype = ECDSA, sshver = 2;
else if (!strcmp(p, "ed25519"))
keytype = ED25519, sshver = 2;
else {
fprintf(stderr,
"puttygen: unknown key type `%s'\n", p);
errs = true;
}
break;
case 'b':
bits = atoi(p);
break;
case 'C':
comment = p;
break;
case 'O':
if (!strcmp(p, "public"))
outtype = PUBLIC;
else if (!strcmp(p, "public-openssh"))
outtype = PUBLICO;
else if (!strcmp(p, "private"))
outtype = PRIVATE;
else if (!strcmp(p, "fingerprint"))
outtype = FP;
else if (!strcmp(p, "private-openssh"))
outtype = OPENSSH_AUTO, sshver = 2;
else if (!strcmp(p, "private-openssh-new"))
outtype = OPENSSH_NEW, sshver = 2;
else if (!strcmp(p, "private-sshcom"))
outtype = SSHCOM, sshver = 2;
else if (!strcmp(p, "text"))
outtype = TEXT;
else {
fprintf(stderr,
"puttygen: unknown output type `%s'\n", p);
errs = true;
}
break;
case 'o':
outfile = p;
break;
}
p = NULL; /* prevent continued processing */
break;
default:
/*
* Unrecognised option.
*/
errs = true;
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: no such option `-%c'\n", c);
break;
}
}
} else {
/*
* A non-option argument.
*/
if (!infile)
infile = p;
else {
errs = true;
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: cannot handle more than one"
" input file\n");
}
}
}
if (bits == -1) {
/*
* No explicit key size was specified. Default varies
* depending on key type.
*/
switch (keytype) {
case ECDSA:
bits = 384;
break;
case ED25519:
bits = 255;
break;
default:
bits = DEFAULT_RSADSA_BITS;
break;
}
}
if (keytype == ECDSA && (bits != 256 && bits != 384 && bits != 521)) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: invalid bits for ECDSA, choose 256, 384 or 521\n");
errs = true;
}
if (keytype == ED25519 && (bits != 255) && (bits != 256)) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: invalid bits for ED25519, choose 255\n");
errs = true;
}
if (keytype == RSA2 || keytype == RSA1 || keytype == DSA) {
if (bits < 256) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: cannot generate %s keys shorter than"
" 256 bits\n", (keytype == DSA ? "DSA" : "RSA"));
errs = true;
} else if (bits < DEFAULT_RSADSA_BITS) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: warning: %s keys shorter than"
" %d bits are probably not secure\n",
(keytype == DSA ? "DSA" : "RSA"), DEFAULT_RSADSA_BITS);
/* but this is just a warning, so proceed anyway */
}
}
if (errs)
RETURN(1);
if (nogo)
RETURN(0);
/*
* If run with at least one argument _but_ not the required
* ones, print the usage message and return failure.
*/
if (!infile && keytype == NOKEYGEN) {
usage(true);
RETURN(1);
}
/* ------------------------------------------------------------------
* Figure out further details of exactly what we're going to do.
*/
/*
* Bomb out if we've been asked to both load and generate a
* key.
*/
if (keytype != NOKEYGEN && infile) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: cannot both load and generate a key\n");
RETURN(1);
}
/*
* We must save the private part when generating a new key.
*/
if (keytype != NOKEYGEN &&
(outtype != PRIVATE && outtype != OPENSSH_AUTO &&
outtype != OPENSSH_NEW && outtype != SSHCOM && outtype != TEXT)) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: this would generate a new key but "
"discard the private part\n");
RETURN(1);
}
/*
* Analyse the type of the input file, in case this affects our
* course of action.
*/
if (infile) {
const char *load_error;
infilename = filename_from_str(infile);
if (!strcmp(infile, "-"))
infile_lf = lf_load_keyfile_fp(stdin, &load_error);
else
infile_lf = lf_load_keyfile(infilename, &load_error);
if (!infile_lf) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: unable to load file `%s': %s\n",
infile, load_error);
RETURN(1);
}
infile_bs = BinarySource_UPCAST(infile_lf);
intype = key_type_s(infile_bs);
BinarySource_REWIND(infile_bs);
switch (intype) {
case SSH_KEYTYPE_UNOPENABLE:
case SSH_KEYTYPE_UNKNOWN:
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: unable to load file `%s': %s\n",
infile, key_type_to_str(intype));
RETURN(1);
case SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH1:
case SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH1_PUBLIC:
if (sshver == 2) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: conversion from SSH-1 to SSH-2 keys"
" not supported\n");
RETURN(1);
}
sshver = 1;
break;
case SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH2:
case SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH2_PUBLIC_RFC4716:
case SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH2_PUBLIC_OPENSSH:
case SSH_KEYTYPE_OPENSSH_PEM:
case SSH_KEYTYPE_OPENSSH_NEW:
case SSH_KEYTYPE_SSHCOM:
if (sshver == 1) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: conversion from SSH-2 to SSH-1 keys"
" not supported\n");
RETURN(1);
}
sshver = 2;
break;
case SSH_KEYTYPE_OPENSSH_AUTO:
default:
unreachable("Should never see these types on an input file");
}
}
/*
* Determine the default output file, if none is provided.
*
* This will usually be equal to stdout, except that if the
* input and output file formats are the same then the default
* output is to overwrite the input.
*
* Also in this code, we bomb out if the input and output file
* formats are the same and no other action is performed.
*/
if ((intype == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH1 && outtype == PRIVATE) ||
(intype == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH2 && outtype == PRIVATE) ||
(intype == SSH_KEYTYPE_OPENSSH_PEM && outtype == OPENSSH_AUTO) ||
(intype == SSH_KEYTYPE_OPENSSH_NEW && outtype == OPENSSH_NEW) ||
(intype == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSHCOM && outtype == SSHCOM)) {
if (!outfile) {
outfile = infile;
outfiletmp = dupcat(outfile, ".tmp");
}
if (!change_passphrase && !comment) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: this command would perform no useful"
" action\n");
RETURN(1);
}
} else {
if (!outfile) {
/*
* Bomb out rather than automatically choosing to write
* a private key file to stdout.
*/
if (outtype == PRIVATE || outtype == OPENSSH_AUTO ||
outtype == OPENSSH_NEW || outtype == SSHCOM) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: need to specify an output file\n");
RETURN(1);
}
}
}
/*
* Figure out whether we need to load the encrypted part of the
* key. This will be the case if either (a) we need to write
* out a private key format, or (b) the entire input key file
* is encrypted.
*/
if (outtype == PRIVATE || outtype == OPENSSH_AUTO ||
outtype == OPENSSH_NEW || outtype == SSHCOM ||
intype == SSH_KEYTYPE_OPENSSH_PEM ||
intype == SSH_KEYTYPE_OPENSSH_NEW ||
intype == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSHCOM)
load_encrypted = true;
else
load_encrypted = false;
if (load_encrypted && (intype == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH1_PUBLIC ||
intype == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH2_PUBLIC_RFC4716 ||
intype == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH2_PUBLIC_OPENSSH)) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: cannot perform this action on a "
"public-key-only input file\n");
RETURN(1);
}
/* ------------------------------------------------------------------
* Now we're ready to actually do some stuff.
*/
/*
* Either load or generate a key.
*/
if (keytype != NOKEYGEN) {
char *entropy;
char default_comment[80];
struct tm tm;
tm = ltime();
if (keytype == DSA)
strftime(default_comment, 30, "dsa-key-%Y%m%d", &tm);
else if (keytype == ECDSA)
strftime(default_comment, 30, "ecdsa-key-%Y%m%d", &tm);
else if (keytype == ED25519)
strftime(default_comment, 30, "ed25519-key-%Y%m%d", &tm);
else
strftime(default_comment, 30, "rsa-key-%Y%m%d", &tm);
entropy = get_random_data(bits / 8, random_device);
if (!entropy) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: failed to collect entropy, "
"could not generate key\n");
RETURN(1);
}
random_setup_special();
Replace PuTTY's PRNG with a Fortuna-like system. This tears out the entire previous random-pool system in sshrand.c. In its place is a system pretty close to Ferguson and Schneier's 'Fortuna' generator, with the main difference being that I use SHA-256 instead of AES for the generation side of the system (rationale given in comment). The PRNG implementation lives in sshprng.c, and defines a self- contained data type with no state stored outside the object, so you can instantiate however many of them you like. The old sshrand.c still exists, but in place of the previous random pool system, it's just become a client of sshprng.c, whose job is to hold a single global instance of the PRNG type, and manage its reference count, save file, noise-collection timers and similar administrative business. Advantages of this change include: - Fortuna is designed with a more varied threat model in mind than my old home-grown random pool. For example, after any request for random numbers, it automatically re-seeds itself, so that if the state of the PRNG should be leaked, it won't give enough information to find out what past outputs _were_. - The PRNG type can be instantiated with any hash function; the instance used by the main tools is based on SHA-256, an improvement on the old pool's use of SHA-1. - The new PRNG only uses the completely standard interface to the hash function API, instead of having to have privileged access to the internal SHA-1 block transform function. This will make it easier to revamp the hash code in general, and also it means that hardware-accelerated versions of SHA-256 will automatically be used for the PRNG as well as for everything else. - The new PRNG can be _tested_! Because it has an actual (if not quite explicit) specification for exactly what the output numbers _ought_ to be derived from the hashes of, I can (and have) put tests in cryptsuite that ensure the output really is being derived in the way I think it is. The old pool could have been returning any old nonsense and it would have been very hard to tell for sure.
2019-01-22 22:42:41 +00:00
random_reseed(make_ptrlen(entropy, bits / 8));
smemclr(entropy, bits/8);
sfree(entropy);
PrimeGenerationContext *pgc = primegen_new_context(
&primegen_probabilistic);
if (keytype == DSA) {
struct dss_key *dsskey = snew(struct dss_key);
dsa_generate(dsskey, bits, pgc, &cmdgen_progress);
ssh2key = snew(ssh2_userkey);
ssh2key->key = &dsskey->sshk;
ssh1key = NULL;
} else if (keytype == ECDSA) {
Complete rewrite of PuTTY's bignum library. The old 'Bignum' data type is gone completely, and so is sshbn.c. In its place is a new thing called 'mp_int', handled by an entirely new library module mpint.c, with API differences both large and small. The main aim of this change is that the new library should be free of timing- and cache-related side channels. I've written the code so that it _should_ - assuming I haven't made any mistakes - do all of its work without either control flow or memory addressing depending on the data words of the input numbers. (Though, being an _arbitrary_ precision library, it does have to at least depend on the sizes of the numbers - but there's a 'formal' size that can vary separately from the actual magnitude of the represented integer, so if you want to keep it secret that your number is actually small, it should work fine to have a very long mp_int and just happen to store 23 in it.) So I've done all my conditionalisation by means of computing both answers and doing bit-masking to swap the right one into place, and all loops over the words of an mp_int go up to the formal size rather than the actual size. I haven't actually tested the constant-time property in any rigorous way yet (I'm still considering the best way to do it). But this code is surely at the very least a big improvement on the old version, even if I later find a few more things to fix. I've also completely rewritten the low-level elliptic curve arithmetic from sshecc.c; the new ecc.c is closer to being an adjunct of mpint.c than it is to the SSH end of the code. The new elliptic curve code keeps all coordinates in Montgomery-multiplication transformed form to speed up all the multiplications mod the same prime, and only converts them back when you ask for the affine coordinates. Also, I adopted extended coordinates for the Edwards curve implementation. sshecc.c has also had a near-total rewrite in the course of switching it over to the new system. While I was there, I've separated ECDSA and EdDSA more completely - they now have separate vtables, instead of a single vtable in which nearly every function had a big if statement in it - and also made the externally exposed types for an ECDSA key and an ECDH context different. A minor new feature: since the new arithmetic code includes a modular square root function, we can now support the compressed point representation for the NIST curves. We seem to have been getting along fine without that so far, but it seemed a shame not to put it in, since it was suddenly easy. In sshrsa.c, one major change is that I've removed the RSA blinding step in rsa_privkey_op, in which we randomise the ciphertext before doing the decryption. The purpose of that was to avoid timing leaks giving away the plaintext - but the new arithmetic code should take that in its stride in the course of also being careful enough to avoid leaking the _private key_, which RSA blinding had no way to do anything about in any case. Apart from those specific points, most of the rest of the changes are more or less mechanical, just changing type names and translating code into the new API.
2018-12-31 13:53:41 +00:00
struct ecdsa_key *ek = snew(struct ecdsa_key);
ecdsa_generate(ek, bits);
ssh2key = snew(ssh2_userkey);
Complete rewrite of PuTTY's bignum library. The old 'Bignum' data type is gone completely, and so is sshbn.c. In its place is a new thing called 'mp_int', handled by an entirely new library module mpint.c, with API differences both large and small. The main aim of this change is that the new library should be free of timing- and cache-related side channels. I've written the code so that it _should_ - assuming I haven't made any mistakes - do all of its work without either control flow or memory addressing depending on the data words of the input numbers. (Though, being an _arbitrary_ precision library, it does have to at least depend on the sizes of the numbers - but there's a 'formal' size that can vary separately from the actual magnitude of the represented integer, so if you want to keep it secret that your number is actually small, it should work fine to have a very long mp_int and just happen to store 23 in it.) So I've done all my conditionalisation by means of computing both answers and doing bit-masking to swap the right one into place, and all loops over the words of an mp_int go up to the formal size rather than the actual size. I haven't actually tested the constant-time property in any rigorous way yet (I'm still considering the best way to do it). But this code is surely at the very least a big improvement on the old version, even if I later find a few more things to fix. I've also completely rewritten the low-level elliptic curve arithmetic from sshecc.c; the new ecc.c is closer to being an adjunct of mpint.c than it is to the SSH end of the code. The new elliptic curve code keeps all coordinates in Montgomery-multiplication transformed form to speed up all the multiplications mod the same prime, and only converts them back when you ask for the affine coordinates. Also, I adopted extended coordinates for the Edwards curve implementation. sshecc.c has also had a near-total rewrite in the course of switching it over to the new system. While I was there, I've separated ECDSA and EdDSA more completely - they now have separate vtables, instead of a single vtable in which nearly every function had a big if statement in it - and also made the externally exposed types for an ECDSA key and an ECDH context different. A minor new feature: since the new arithmetic code includes a modular square root function, we can now support the compressed point representation for the NIST curves. We seem to have been getting along fine without that so far, but it seemed a shame not to put it in, since it was suddenly easy. In sshrsa.c, one major change is that I've removed the RSA blinding step in rsa_privkey_op, in which we randomise the ciphertext before doing the decryption. The purpose of that was to avoid timing leaks giving away the plaintext - but the new arithmetic code should take that in its stride in the course of also being careful enough to avoid leaking the _private key_, which RSA blinding had no way to do anything about in any case. Apart from those specific points, most of the rest of the changes are more or less mechanical, just changing type names and translating code into the new API.
2018-12-31 13:53:41 +00:00
ssh2key->key = &ek->sshk;
ssh1key = NULL;
} else if (keytype == ED25519) {
Complete rewrite of PuTTY's bignum library. The old 'Bignum' data type is gone completely, and so is sshbn.c. In its place is a new thing called 'mp_int', handled by an entirely new library module mpint.c, with API differences both large and small. The main aim of this change is that the new library should be free of timing- and cache-related side channels. I've written the code so that it _should_ - assuming I haven't made any mistakes - do all of its work without either control flow or memory addressing depending on the data words of the input numbers. (Though, being an _arbitrary_ precision library, it does have to at least depend on the sizes of the numbers - but there's a 'formal' size that can vary separately from the actual magnitude of the represented integer, so if you want to keep it secret that your number is actually small, it should work fine to have a very long mp_int and just happen to store 23 in it.) So I've done all my conditionalisation by means of computing both answers and doing bit-masking to swap the right one into place, and all loops over the words of an mp_int go up to the formal size rather than the actual size. I haven't actually tested the constant-time property in any rigorous way yet (I'm still considering the best way to do it). But this code is surely at the very least a big improvement on the old version, even if I later find a few more things to fix. I've also completely rewritten the low-level elliptic curve arithmetic from sshecc.c; the new ecc.c is closer to being an adjunct of mpint.c than it is to the SSH end of the code. The new elliptic curve code keeps all coordinates in Montgomery-multiplication transformed form to speed up all the multiplications mod the same prime, and only converts them back when you ask for the affine coordinates. Also, I adopted extended coordinates for the Edwards curve implementation. sshecc.c has also had a near-total rewrite in the course of switching it over to the new system. While I was there, I've separated ECDSA and EdDSA more completely - they now have separate vtables, instead of a single vtable in which nearly every function had a big if statement in it - and also made the externally exposed types for an ECDSA key and an ECDH context different. A minor new feature: since the new arithmetic code includes a modular square root function, we can now support the compressed point representation for the NIST curves. We seem to have been getting along fine without that so far, but it seemed a shame not to put it in, since it was suddenly easy. In sshrsa.c, one major change is that I've removed the RSA blinding step in rsa_privkey_op, in which we randomise the ciphertext before doing the decryption. The purpose of that was to avoid timing leaks giving away the plaintext - but the new arithmetic code should take that in its stride in the course of also being careful enough to avoid leaking the _private key_, which RSA blinding had no way to do anything about in any case. Apart from those specific points, most of the rest of the changes are more or less mechanical, just changing type names and translating code into the new API.
2018-12-31 13:53:41 +00:00
struct eddsa_key *ek = snew(struct eddsa_key);
eddsa_generate(ek, bits);
ssh2key = snew(ssh2_userkey);
Complete rewrite of PuTTY's bignum library. The old 'Bignum' data type is gone completely, and so is sshbn.c. In its place is a new thing called 'mp_int', handled by an entirely new library module mpint.c, with API differences both large and small. The main aim of this change is that the new library should be free of timing- and cache-related side channels. I've written the code so that it _should_ - assuming I haven't made any mistakes - do all of its work without either control flow or memory addressing depending on the data words of the input numbers. (Though, being an _arbitrary_ precision library, it does have to at least depend on the sizes of the numbers - but there's a 'formal' size that can vary separately from the actual magnitude of the represented integer, so if you want to keep it secret that your number is actually small, it should work fine to have a very long mp_int and just happen to store 23 in it.) So I've done all my conditionalisation by means of computing both answers and doing bit-masking to swap the right one into place, and all loops over the words of an mp_int go up to the formal size rather than the actual size. I haven't actually tested the constant-time property in any rigorous way yet (I'm still considering the best way to do it). But this code is surely at the very least a big improvement on the old version, even if I later find a few more things to fix. I've also completely rewritten the low-level elliptic curve arithmetic from sshecc.c; the new ecc.c is closer to being an adjunct of mpint.c than it is to the SSH end of the code. The new elliptic curve code keeps all coordinates in Montgomery-multiplication transformed form to speed up all the multiplications mod the same prime, and only converts them back when you ask for the affine coordinates. Also, I adopted extended coordinates for the Edwards curve implementation. sshecc.c has also had a near-total rewrite in the course of switching it over to the new system. While I was there, I've separated ECDSA and EdDSA more completely - they now have separate vtables, instead of a single vtable in which nearly every function had a big if statement in it - and also made the externally exposed types for an ECDSA key and an ECDH context different. A minor new feature: since the new arithmetic code includes a modular square root function, we can now support the compressed point representation for the NIST curves. We seem to have been getting along fine without that so far, but it seemed a shame not to put it in, since it was suddenly easy. In sshrsa.c, one major change is that I've removed the RSA blinding step in rsa_privkey_op, in which we randomise the ciphertext before doing the decryption. The purpose of that was to avoid timing leaks giving away the plaintext - but the new arithmetic code should take that in its stride in the course of also being careful enough to avoid leaking the _private key_, which RSA blinding had no way to do anything about in any case. Apart from those specific points, most of the rest of the changes are more or less mechanical, just changing type names and translating code into the new API.
2018-12-31 13:53:41 +00:00
ssh2key->key = &ek->sshk;
ssh1key = NULL;
} else {
RSAKey *rsakey = snew(RSAKey);
rsa_generate(rsakey, bits, pgc, &cmdgen_progress);
rsakey->comment = NULL;
if (keytype == RSA1) {
ssh1key = rsakey;
} else {
ssh2key = snew(ssh2_userkey);
ssh2key->key = &rsakey->sshk;
}
}
primegen_free_context(pgc);
if (ssh2key)
ssh2key->comment = dupstr(default_comment);
if (ssh1key)
ssh1key->comment = dupstr(default_comment);
} else {
const char *error = NULL;
bool encrypted;
assert(infile != NULL);
sfree(origcomment);
origcomment = NULL;
/*
* Find out whether the input key is encrypted.
*/
if (intype == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH1)
encrypted = rsa1_encrypted_s(infile_bs, &origcomment);
else if (intype == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH2)
encrypted = ppk_encrypted_s(infile_bs, &origcomment);
else
encrypted = import_encrypted_s(infilename, infile_bs,
intype, &origcomment);
BinarySource_REWIND(infile_bs);
/*
* If so, ask for a passphrase.
*/
if (encrypted && load_encrypted) {
if (!old_passphrase) {
prompts_t *p = new_prompts();
int ret;
p->to_server = false;
p->from_server = false;
p->name = dupstr("SSH key passphrase");
add_prompt(p, dupstr("Enter passphrase to load key: "), false);
ret = console_get_userpass_input(p);
assert(ret >= 0);
if (!ret) {
free_prompts(p);
perror("puttygen: unable to read passphrase");
RETURN(1);
} else {
old_passphrase = prompt_get_result(p->prompts[0]);
free_prompts(p);
}
}
} else {
old_passphrase = NULL;
}
switch (intype) {
int ret;
case SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH1:
case SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH1_PUBLIC:
ssh1key = snew(RSAKey);
memset(ssh1key, 0, sizeof(RSAKey));
if (!load_encrypted) {
strbuf *blob;
BinarySource src[1];
sfree(origcomment);
origcomment = NULL;
blob = strbuf_new();
ret = rsa1_loadpub_s(infile_bs, BinarySink_UPCAST(blob),
&origcomment, &error);
BinarySource_BARE_INIT(src, blob->u, blob->len);
get_rsa_ssh1_pub(src, ssh1key, RSA_SSH1_EXPONENT_FIRST);
strbuf_free(blob);
ssh1key->comment = dupstr(origcomment);
ssh1key->private_exponent = NULL;
ssh1key->p = NULL;
ssh1key->q = NULL;
ssh1key->iqmp = NULL;
} else {
ret = rsa1_load_s(infile_bs, ssh1key, old_passphrase, &error);
}
BinarySource_REWIND(infile_bs);
if (ret > 0)
error = NULL;
else if (!error)
error = "unknown error";
break;
case SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH2:
case SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH2_PUBLIC_RFC4716:
case SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH2_PUBLIC_OPENSSH:
if (!load_encrypted) {
sfree(origcomment);
origcomment = NULL;
ssh2blob = strbuf_new();
if (ppk_loadpub_s(infile_bs, &ssh2alg,
BinarySink_UPCAST(ssh2blob),
&origcomment, &error)) {
const ssh_keyalg *alg = find_pubkey_alg(ssh2alg);
if (alg)
bits = ssh_key_public_bits(
alg, ptrlen_from_strbuf(ssh2blob));
else
bits = -1;
} else {
strbuf_free(ssh2blob);
ssh2blob = NULL;
}
sfree(ssh2alg);
} else {
ssh2key = ppk_load_s(infile_bs, old_passphrase, &error);
}
BinarySource_REWIND(infile_bs);
if ((ssh2key && ssh2key != SSH2_WRONG_PASSPHRASE) || ssh2blob)
error = NULL;
else if (!error) {
if (ssh2key == SSH2_WRONG_PASSPHRASE)
error = "wrong passphrase";
else
error = "unknown error";
}
break;
case SSH_KEYTYPE_OPENSSH_PEM:
case SSH_KEYTYPE_OPENSSH_NEW:
case SSH_KEYTYPE_SSHCOM:
ssh2key = import_ssh2_s(infile_bs, intype, old_passphrase, &error);
if (ssh2key) {
if (ssh2key != SSH2_WRONG_PASSPHRASE)
error = NULL;
else
error = "wrong passphrase";
} else if (!error)
error = "unknown error";
break;
default:
unreachable("bad input key type");
}
if (error) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: error loading `%s': %s\n",
infile, error);
RETURN(1);
}
}
/*
* Change the comment if asked to.
*/
if (comment) {
if (sshver == 1) {
assert(ssh1key);
sfree(ssh1key->comment);
ssh1key->comment = dupstr(comment);
} else {
assert(ssh2key);
sfree(ssh2key->comment);
ssh2key->comment = dupstr(comment);
}
}
/*
* Unless we're changing the passphrase, the old one (if any) is a
* reasonable default.
*/
if (!change_passphrase && old_passphrase && !new_passphrase)
new_passphrase = dupstr(old_passphrase);
/*
* Prompt for a new passphrase if we have been asked to, or if
* we have just generated a key.
*
* In the latter case, an exception is if we're producing text
* output, because that output format doesn't support encryption
* in any case.
*/
if (!new_passphrase && (change_passphrase ||
(keytype != NOKEYGEN && outtype != TEXT))) {
prompts_t *p = new_prompts();
int ret;
p->to_server = false;
p->from_server = false;
p->name = dupstr("New SSH key passphrase");
add_prompt(p, dupstr("Enter passphrase to save key: "), false);
add_prompt(p, dupstr("Re-enter passphrase to verify: "), false);
ret = console_get_userpass_input(p);
assert(ret >= 0);
if (!ret) {
free_prompts(p);
perror("puttygen: unable to read new passphrase");
RETURN(1);
} else {
if (strcmp(prompt_get_result_ref(p->prompts[0]),
prompt_get_result_ref(p->prompts[1]))) {
free_prompts(p);
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: passphrases do not match\n");
RETURN(1);
}
new_passphrase = prompt_get_result(p->prompts[0]);
free_prompts(p);
}
}
if (new_passphrase && !*new_passphrase) {
sfree(new_passphrase);
new_passphrase = NULL;
}
/*
* Write output.
*
* (In the case where outfile and outfiletmp are both NULL,
* there is no semantic reason to initialise outfilename at
* all; but we have to write _something_ to it or some compiler
* will probably complain that it might be used uninitialised.)
*/
if (outfiletmp)
outfilename = filename_from_str(outfiletmp);
else
outfilename = filename_from_str(outfile ? outfile : "");
switch (outtype) {
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 19:23:19 +00:00
bool ret;
int real_outtype;
case PRIVATE:
random_ref(); /* we'll need a few random bytes in the save file */
if (sshver == 1) {
assert(ssh1key);
ret = rsa1_save_f(outfilename, ssh1key, new_passphrase);
if (!ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: unable to save SSH-1 private key\n");
RETURN(1);
}
} else {
assert(ssh2key);
ret = ppk_save_f(outfilename, ssh2key, new_passphrase);
if (!ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: unable to save SSH-2 private key\n");
RETURN(1);
}
}
if (outfiletmp) {
if (!move(outfiletmp, outfile))
RETURN(1); /* rename failed */
}
break;
case PUBLIC:
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch. Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now I've mostly been writing this in the form switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; } break; } which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get! After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks more like this: switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; break; } } This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is relieved. (Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the initialiser clause of its for statement.) Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change. Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 07:49:52 +00:00
case PUBLICO: {
FILE *fp;
if (outfile) {
fp = f_open(outfilename, "w", false);
if (!fp) {
fprintf(stderr, "unable to open output file\n");
exit(1);
}
} else {
fp = stdout;
}
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch. Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now I've mostly been writing this in the form switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; } break; } which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get! After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks more like this: switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; break; } } This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is relieved. (Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the initialiser clause of its for statement.) Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change. Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 07:49:52 +00:00
if (sshver == 1) {
ssh1_write_pubkey(fp, ssh1key);
} else {
if (!ssh2blob) {
assert(ssh2key);
ssh2blob = strbuf_new();
ssh_key_public_blob(ssh2key->key, BinarySink_UPCAST(ssh2blob));
}
ssh2_write_pubkey(fp, ssh2key ? ssh2key->comment : origcomment,
ssh2blob->s, ssh2blob->len,
(outtype == PUBLIC ?
SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH2_PUBLIC_RFC4716 :
SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH2_PUBLIC_OPENSSH));
}
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch. Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now I've mostly been writing this in the form switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; } break; } which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get! After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks more like this: switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; break; } } This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is relieved. (Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the initialiser clause of its for statement.) Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change. Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 07:49:52 +00:00
if (outfile)
fclose(fp);
break;
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch. Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now I've mostly been writing this in the form switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; } break; } which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get! After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks more like this: switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; break; } } This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is relieved. (Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the initialiser clause of its for statement.) Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change. Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 07:49:52 +00:00
}
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch. Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now I've mostly been writing this in the form switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; } break; } which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get! After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks more like this: switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; break; } } This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is relieved. (Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the initialiser clause of its for statement.) Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change. Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 07:49:52 +00:00
case FP: {
FILE *fp;
char *fingerprint;
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch. Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now I've mostly been writing this in the form switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; } break; } which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get! After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks more like this: switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; break; } } This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is relieved. (Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the initialiser clause of its for statement.) Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change. Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 07:49:52 +00:00
if (sshver == 1) {
assert(ssh1key);
fingerprint = rsa_ssh1_fingerprint(ssh1key);
} else {
if (ssh2key) {
fingerprint = ssh2_fingerprint(ssh2key->key);
} else {
assert(ssh2blob);
fingerprint = ssh2_fingerprint_blob(
ptrlen_from_strbuf(ssh2blob));
}
}
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch. Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now I've mostly been writing this in the form switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; } break; } which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get! After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks more like this: switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; break; } } This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is relieved. (Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the initialiser clause of its for statement.) Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change. Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 07:49:52 +00:00
if (outfile) {
fp = f_open(outfilename, "w", false);
if (!fp) {
fprintf(stderr, "unable to open output file\n");
exit(1);
}
} else {
fp = stdout;
}
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch. Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now I've mostly been writing this in the form switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; } break; } which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get! After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks more like this: switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; break; } } This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is relieved. (Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the initialiser clause of its for statement.) Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change. Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 07:49:52 +00:00
fprintf(fp, "%s\n", fingerprint);
if (outfile)
fclose(fp);
sfree(fingerprint);
break;
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch. Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now I've mostly been writing this in the form switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; } break; } which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get! After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks more like this: switch (discriminant) { case SIMPLE: do stuff; break; case COMPLICATED: { declare variables; do stuff; break; } } This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is relieved. (Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the initialiser clause of its for statement.) Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change. Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 07:49:52 +00:00
}
case OPENSSH_AUTO:
case OPENSSH_NEW:
case SSHCOM:
assert(sshver == 2);
assert(ssh2key);
random_ref(); /* both foreign key types require randomness,
* for IV or padding */
switch (outtype) {
case OPENSSH_AUTO:
real_outtype = SSH_KEYTYPE_OPENSSH_AUTO;
break;
case OPENSSH_NEW:
real_outtype = SSH_KEYTYPE_OPENSSH_NEW;
break;
case SSHCOM:
real_outtype = SSH_KEYTYPE_SSHCOM;
break;
default:
unreachable("control flow goof");
}
ret = export_ssh2(outfilename, real_outtype, ssh2key, new_passphrase);
if (!ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: unable to export key\n");
RETURN(1);
}
if (outfiletmp) {
if (!move(outfiletmp, outfile))
RETURN(1); /* rename failed */
}
break;
case TEXT: {
key_components *kc;
if (sshver == 1) {
assert(ssh1key);
kc = rsa_components(ssh1key);
} else {
if (ssh2key) {
kc = ssh_key_components(ssh2key->key);
} else {
assert(ssh2blob);
BinarySource src[1];
BinarySource_BARE_INIT_PL(src, ptrlen_from_strbuf(ssh2blob));
ptrlen algname = get_string(src);
const ssh_keyalg *alg = find_pubkey_alg_len(algname);
if (!alg) {
fprintf(stderr, "puttygen: cannot extract key components "
"from public key of unknown type '%.*s'\n",
PTRLEN_PRINTF(algname));
RETURN(1);
}
ssh_key *sk = ssh_key_new_pub(
alg, ptrlen_from_strbuf(ssh2blob));
kc = ssh_key_components(sk);
ssh_key_free(sk);
}
}
FILE *fp;
if (outfile) {
fp = f_open(outfilename, "w", false);
if (!fp) {
fprintf(stderr, "unable to open output file\n");
exit(1);
}
} else {
fp = stdout;
}
for (size_t i = 0; i < kc->ncomponents; i++) {
if (kc->components[i].is_mp_int) {
char *hex = mp_get_hex(kc->components[i].mp);
fprintf(fp, "%s=0x%s\n", kc->components[i].name, hex);
smemclr(hex, strlen(hex));
sfree(hex);
} else {
fprintf(fp, "%s=\"", kc->components[i].name);
write_c_string_literal(fp, ptrlen_from_asciz(
kc->components[i].text));
fputs("\"\n", fp);
}
}
if (outfile)
fclose(fp);
key_components_free(kc);
break;
}
}
out:
#undef RETURN
if (old_passphrase) {
smemclr(old_passphrase, strlen(old_passphrase));
sfree(old_passphrase);
}
if (new_passphrase) {
smemclr(new_passphrase, strlen(new_passphrase));
sfree(new_passphrase);
}
if (ssh1key) {
freersakey(ssh1key);
sfree(ssh1key);
}
if (ssh2key && ssh2key != SSH2_WRONG_PASSPHRASE) {
sfree(ssh2key->comment);
if (ssh2key->key)
ssh_key_free(ssh2key->key);
sfree(ssh2key);
}
if (ssh2blob)
strbuf_free(ssh2blob);
sfree(origcomment);
if (infilename)
filename_free(infilename);
if (infile_lf)
lf_free(infile_lf);
if (outfilename)
filename_free(outfilename);
sfree(outfiletmp);
return exit_status;
}