2003-03-29 19:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Unix PuTTY main program.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <stdio.h>
|
2003-03-31 12:10:53 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <ctype.h>
|
2003-03-31 11:21:07 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <stdlib.h>
|
2003-03-29 19:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <assert.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <unistd.h>
|
2015-08-22 13:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <gtk/gtk.h>
|
2004-10-06 22:31:07 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <gdk/gdk.h>
|
2003-03-29 19:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Make the configuration dialog non-modal.
Now every call to do_config_box is replaced with a call to
create_config_box, which returns immediately having constructed the
new GTK window object, and is passed a callback function which it will
arrange to be called when the dialog terminates (whether by OK or by
Cancel). That callback is now what triggers the construction of a
session window after 'Open' is pressed in the initial config box, or
the actual mid-session reconfiguration action after 'Apply' is pressed
in a Change Settings box.
We were already prepared to ignore the re-selection of 'Change
Settings' from the context menu of a window that already had a Change
Settings box open (and not accidentally create a second config box for
the same window); but now we do slightly better, by finding the
existing config box and un-minimising and raising it, in case the user
had forgotten it was there.
That's a useful featurelet, but not the main purpose of this change.
The mani point, of course, is that now the multi-window GtkApplication
based front ends now don't do anything confusing to the nesting of
gtk_main() when config boxes are involved. Whether you're changing the
settings of one (or more than one) of your already-running sessions,
preparing to start up a new PuTTY connection, or both at once, we stay
in the same top-level instance of gtk_main() and all sessions' top-
level callbacks continue to run sensibly.
2017-11-26 11:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
#define MAY_REFER_TO_GTK_IN_HEADERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003-03-29 19:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "putty.h"
|
2020-01-29 06:19:30 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "ssh.h"
|
2003-03-29 19:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "storage.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-08-22 13:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "gtkcompat.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-02-06 15:52:00 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Stubs to avoid uxpty.c needing to be linked in.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 19:23:19 +00:00
|
|
|
const bool use_pty_argv = false;
|
2019-09-08 19:29:00 +00:00
|
|
|
char **pty_argv; /* never used */
|
2016-03-23 22:13:30 +00:00
|
|
|
char *pty_osx_envrestore_prefix;
|
2005-02-06 15:52:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2003-03-29 19:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Clean up and exit.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
void cleanup_exit(int code)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Clean up.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
sk_cleanup();
|
|
|
|
|
random_save_seed();
|
|
|
|
|
exit(code);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-05 06:03:46 +00:00
|
|
|
const struct BackendVtable *select_backend(Conf *conf)
|
2003-03-29 19:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-05 06:03:46 +00:00
|
|
|
const struct BackendVtable *vt =
|
2018-09-11 15:23:38 +00:00
|
|
|
backend_vt_from_proto(conf_get_int(conf, CONF_protocol));
|
|
|
|
|
assert(vt != NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
return vt;
|
2003-03-29 19:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make the configuration dialog non-modal.
Now every call to do_config_box is replaced with a call to
create_config_box, which returns immediately having constructed the
new GTK window object, and is passed a callback function which it will
arrange to be called when the dialog terminates (whether by OK or by
Cancel). That callback is now what triggers the construction of a
session window after 'Open' is pressed in the initial config box, or
the actual mid-session reconfiguration action after 'Apply' is pressed
in a Change Settings box.
We were already prepared to ignore the re-selection of 'Change
Settings' from the context menu of a window that already had a Change
Settings box open (and not accidentally create a second config box for
the same window); but now we do slightly better, by finding the
existing config box and un-minimising and raising it, in case the user
had forgotten it was there.
That's a useful featurelet, but not the main purpose of this change.
The mani point, of course, is that now the multi-window GtkApplication
based front ends now don't do anything confusing to the nesting of
gtk_main() when config boxes are involved. Whether you're changing the
settings of one (or more than one) of your already-running sessions,
preparing to start up a new PuTTY connection, or both at once, we stay
in the same top-level instance of gtk_main() and all sessions' top-
level callbacks continue to run sensibly.
2017-11-26 11:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
void initial_config_box(Conf *conf, post_dialog_fn_t after, void *afterctx)
|
2003-03-29 19:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Make dupcat() into a variadic macro.
Up until now, it's been a variadic _function_, whose argument list
consists of 'const char *' ASCIZ strings to concatenate, terminated by
one containing a null pointer. Now, that function is dupcat_fn(), and
it's wrapped by a C99 variadic _macro_ called dupcat(), which
automatically suffixes the null-pointer terminating argument.
This has three benefits. Firstly, it's just less effort at every call
site. Secondly, it protects against the risk of accidentally leaving
off the NULL, causing arbitrary words of stack memory to be
dereferenced as char pointers. And thirdly, it protects against the
more subtle risk of writing a bare 'NULL' as the terminating argument,
instead of casting it explicitly to a pointer. That last one is
necessary because C permits the macro NULL to expand to an integer
constant such as 0, so NULL by itself may not have pointer type, and
worse, it may not be marshalled in a variadic argument list in the
same way as a pointer. (For example, on a 64-bit machine it might only
occupy 32 bits. And yet, on another 64-bit platform, it might work
just fine, so that you don't notice the mistake!)
I was inspired to do this by happening to notice one of those bare
NULL terminators, and thinking I'd better check if there were any
more. Turned out there were quite a few. Now there are none.
2019-10-14 18:42:37 +00:00
|
|
|
char *title = dupcat(appname, " Configuration");
|
2018-10-29 19:50:29 +00:00
|
|
|
create_config_box(title, conf, false, 0, after, afterctx);
|
2008-06-15 13:26:08 +00:00
|
|
|
sfree(title);
|
2003-03-29 19:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 19:23:19 +00:00
|
|
|
const bool use_event_log = true, new_session = true, saved_sessions = true;
|
|
|
|
|
const bool dup_check_launchable = true;
|
2003-04-09 18:46:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2003-03-31 11:42:45 +00:00
|
|
|
char *make_default_wintitle(char *hostname)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
Make dupcat() into a variadic macro.
Up until now, it's been a variadic _function_, whose argument list
consists of 'const char *' ASCIZ strings to concatenate, terminated by
one containing a null pointer. Now, that function is dupcat_fn(), and
it's wrapped by a C99 variadic _macro_ called dupcat(), which
automatically suffixes the null-pointer terminating argument.
This has three benefits. Firstly, it's just less effort at every call
site. Secondly, it protects against the risk of accidentally leaving
off the NULL, causing arbitrary words of stack memory to be
dereferenced as char pointers. And thirdly, it protects against the
more subtle risk of writing a bare 'NULL' as the terminating argument,
instead of casting it explicitly to a pointer. That last one is
necessary because C permits the macro NULL to expand to an integer
constant such as 0, so NULL by itself may not have pointer type, and
worse, it may not be marshalled in a variadic argument list in the
same way as a pointer. (For example, on a 64-bit machine it might only
occupy 32 bits. And yet, on another 64-bit platform, it might work
just fine, so that you don't notice the mistake!)
I was inspired to do this by happening to notice one of those bare
NULL terminators, and thinking I'd better check if there were any
more. Turned out there were quite a few. Now there are none.
2019-10-14 18:42:37 +00:00
|
|
|
return dupcat(hostname, " - ", appname);
|
2003-03-31 11:42:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-10-06 22:31:07 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* X11-forwarding-related things suitable for Gtk app.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
char *platform_get_x_display(void) {
|
|
|
|
|
const char *display;
|
|
|
|
|
/* Try to take account of --display and what have you. */
|
|
|
|
|
if (!(display = gdk_get_display()))
|
2019-09-08 19:29:00 +00:00
|
|
|
/* fall back to traditional method */
|
|
|
|
|
display = getenv("DISPLAY");
|
2004-10-06 22:31:07 +00:00
|
|
|
return dupstr(display);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 19:23:19 +00:00
|
|
|
const bool share_can_be_downstream = true;
|
|
|
|
|
const bool share_can_be_upstream = true;
|
2013-11-17 14:05:41 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 19:23:19 +00:00
|
|
|
void setup(bool single)
|
2003-03-29 19:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
sk_init();
|
Remove FLAG_VERBOSE.
The global 'int flags' has always been an ugly feature of this code
base, and I suddenly thought that perhaps it's time to start throwing
it out, one flag at a time, until it's totally unused.
My first target is FLAG_VERBOSE. This was usually set by cmdline.c
when it saw a -v option on the program's command line, except that GUI
PuTTY itself sets it unconditionally on startup. And then various bits
of the code would check it in order to decide whether to print a given
message.
In the current system of front-end abstraction traits, there's no
_one_ place that I can move it to. But there are two: every place that
checked FLAG_VERBOSE has access to either a Seat or a LogPolicy. So
now each of those traits has a query method for 'do I want verbose
messages?'.
A good effect of this is that subsidiary Seats, like the ones used in
Uppity for the main SSH server module itself and the server end of
shell channels, now get to have their own verbosity setting instead of
inheriting the one global one. In fact I don't expect any code using
those Seats to be generating any messages at all, but if that changes
later, we'll have a way to control it. (Who knows, perhaps logging in
Uppity might become a thing.)
As part of this cleanup, I've added a new flag to cmdline_tooltype,
called TOOLTYPE_NO_VERBOSE_OPTION. The unconditionally-verbose tools
now set that, and it has the effect of making cmdline.c disallow -v
completely. So where 'putty -v' would previously have been silently
ignored ("I was already verbose"), it's now an error, reminding you
that that option doesn't actually do anything.
Finally, the 'default_logpolicy' provided by uxcons.c and wincons.c
(with identical definitions) has had to move into a new file of its
own, because now it has to ask cmdline.c for the verbosity setting as
well as asking console.c for the rest of its methods. So there's a new
file clicons.c which can only be included by programs that link
against both cmdline.c _and_ one of the *cons.c, and I've renamed the
logpolicy to reflect that.
2020-01-30 06:40:21 +00:00
|
|
|
cmdline_tooltype |= TOOLTYPE_HOST_ARG | TOOLTYPE_PORT_ARG |
|
|
|
|
|
TOOLTYPE_NO_VERBOSE_OPTION;
|
2003-03-29 19:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
default_protocol = be_default_protocol;
|
|
|
|
|
/* Find the appropriate default port. */
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-05 06:03:46 +00:00
|
|
|
const struct BackendVtable *vt =
|
2018-09-11 15:23:38 +00:00
|
|
|
backend_vt_from_proto(default_protocol);
|
2019-09-08 19:29:00 +00:00
|
|
|
default_port = 0; /* illegal */
|
2018-09-11 15:23:38 +00:00
|
|
|
if (vt)
|
|
|
|
|
default_port = vt->default_port;
|
2003-03-29 19:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|