2017-11-27 19:38:02 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2022-08-23 17:57:58 +00:00
|
|
|
* no-cmdline.c - stubs in applications which don't do the
|
2017-11-27 19:38:02 +00:00
|
|
|
* standard(ish) PuTTY tools' command-line parsing
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <stdio.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <assert.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <stdlib.h>
|
|
|
|
#include "putty.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Stub version of the function in cmdline.c which provides the
|
|
|
|
* password to SSH authentication by remembering it having been passed
|
|
|
|
* as a command-line option. If we're not doing normal command-line
|
|
|
|
* handling, then there is no such option, so that function always
|
|
|
|
* returns failure.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Fix command-line password handling in Restart Session.
When the user provides a password on the PuTTY command line, via -pw
or -pwfile, the flag 'tried_once' inside cmdline_get_passwd_input() is
intended to arrange that we only try sending that password once, and
after we've sent it, we don't try again.
But this plays badly with the 'Restart Session' operation. If the
connection is lost and then restarted at user request, we _do_ want to
send that password again!
So this commit moves that static variable out into a small state
structure held by the client of cmdline_get_passwd_input. Each client
can decide how to manage that state itself.
Clients that support 'Restart Session' - i.e. just GUI PuTTY itself -
will initialise the state at the same time as instantiating the
backend, so that every time the session is restarted, we return
to (correctly) believing that we _haven't_ yet tried the password
provided on the command line.
But clients that don't support 'Restart Session' - i.e. Plink and file
transfer tools - can do the same thing that cmdline.c was doing
before: just keep the state in a static variable.
This also means that the GUI login tools will now retain the
command-line password in memory, whereas previously they'd have wiped
it out once it was used. But the other tools will still wipe and free
the password, because I've also added a 'bool restartable' flag to
cmdline_get_passwd_input to let it know when it _is_ allowed to do
that.
In the GUI tools, I don't see any way to get round that, because if
the session is restarted you _have_ to still have the password to use
again. (And you can't infer that that will never happen from the
CONF_close_on_exit setting, because that too could be changed in
mid-session.) On the other hand, I think it's not all that worrying,
because the use of either -pw or -pwfile means that a persistent copy
of your password is *already* stored somewhere, so another one isn't
too big a stretch.
(Due to the change of -pw policy in 0.77, the effect of this bug was
that an attempt to reconnect in a session set up this way would lead
to "Configured password was not accepted". In 0.76, the failure mode
was different: PuTTY would interactively prompt for the password,
having wiped it out of memory after it was used the first time round.)
2022-05-18 12:04:56 +00:00
|
|
|
SeatPromptResult cmdline_get_passwd_input(
|
|
|
|
prompts_t *p, cmdline_get_passwd_input_state *state, bool restartable)
|
2017-11-27 19:38:02 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Richer data type for interactive prompt results.
All the seat functions that request an interactive prompt of some kind
to the user - both the main seat_get_userpass_input and the various
confirmation dialogs for things like host keys - were using a simple
int return value, with the general semantics of 0 = "fail", 1 =
"proceed" (and in the case of seat_get_userpass_input, answers to the
prompts were provided), and -1 = "request in progress, wait for a
callback".
In this commit I change all those functions' return types to a new
struct called SeatPromptResult, whose primary field is an enum
replacing those simple integer values.
The main purpose is that the enum has not three but _four_ values: the
"fail" result has been split into 'user abort' and 'software abort'.
The distinction is that a user abort occurs as a result of an
interactive UI action, such as the user clicking 'cancel' in a dialog
box or hitting ^D or ^C at a terminal password prompt - and therefore,
there's no need to display an error message telling the user that the
interactive operation has failed, because the user already knows,
because they _did_ it. 'Software abort' is from any other cause, where
PuTTY is the first to know there was a problem, and has to tell the
user.
We already had this 'user abort' vs 'software abort' distinction in
other parts of the code - the SSH backend has separate termination
functions which protocol layers can call. But we assumed that any
failure from an interactive prompt request fell into the 'user abort'
category, which is not true. A couple of examples: if you configure a
host key fingerprint in your saved session via the SSH > Host keys
pane, and the server presents a host key that doesn't match it, then
verify_ssh_host_key would report that the user had aborted the
connection, and feel no need to tell the user what had gone wrong!
Similarly, if a password provided on the command line was not
accepted, then (after I fixed the semantics of that in the previous
commit) the same wrong handling would occur.
So now, those Seat prompt functions too can communicate whether the
user or the software originated a connection abort. And in the latter
case, we also provide an error message to present to the user. Result:
in those two example cases (and others), error messages should no
longer go missing.
Implementation note: to avoid the hassle of having the error message
in a SeatPromptResult being a dynamically allocated string (and hence,
every recipient of one must always check whether it's non-NULL and
free it on every exit path, plus being careful about copying the
struct around), I've instead arranged that the structure contains a
function pointer and a couple of parameters, so that the string form
of the message can be constructed on demand. That way, the only users
who need to free it are the ones who actually _asked_ for it in the
first place, which is a much smaller set.
(This is one of the rare occasions that I regret not having C++'s
extra features available in this code base - a unique_ptr or
shared_ptr to a string would have been just the thing here, and the
compiler would have done all the hard work for me of remembering where
to insert the frees!)
2021-12-28 17:52:00 +00:00
|
|
|
return SPR_INCOMPLETE;
|
2017-11-27 19:38:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|