1
0
mirror of https://git.tartarus.org/simon/putty.git synced 2025-01-10 09:58:01 +00:00
putty-source/crypto/CMakeLists.txt

235 lines
7.0 KiB
CMake
Raw Normal View History

add_sources_from_current_dir(crypto
Break up crypto modules containing HW acceleration. This applies to all of AES, SHA-1, SHA-256 and SHA-512. All those source files previously contained multiple implementations of the algorithm, enabled or disabled by ifdefs detecting whether they would work on a given compiler. And in order to get advanced machine instructions like AES-NI or NEON crypto into the output file when the compile flags hadn't enabled them, we had to do nasty stuff with compiler-specific pragmas or attributes. Now we can do the detection at cmake time, and enable advanced instructions in the more sensible way, by compile-time flags. So I've broken up each of these modules into lots of sub-pieces: a file called (e.g.) 'foo-common.c' containing common definitions across all implementations (such as round constants), one called 'foo-select.c' containing the top-level vtable(s), and a separate file for each implementation exporting just the vtable(s) for that implementation. One advantage of this is that it depends a lot less on compiler- specific bodgery. My particular least favourite part of the previous setup was the part where I had to _manually_ define some Arm ACLE feature macros before including <arm_neon.h>, so that it would define the intrinsics I wanted. Now I'm enabling interesting architecture features in the normal way, on the compiler command line, there's no need for that kind of trick: the right feature macros are already defined and <arm_neon.h> does the right thing. Another change in this reorganisation is that I've stopped assuming there's just one hardware implementation per platform. Previously, the accelerated vtables were called things like sha256_hw, and varied between FOO-NI and NEON depending on platform; and the selection code would simply ask 'is hw available? if so, use hw, else sw'. Now, each HW acceleration strategy names its vtable its own way, and the selection vtable has a whole list of possibilities to iterate over looking for a supported one. So if someone feels like writing a second accelerated implementation of something for a given platform - for example, I've heard you can use plain NEON to speed up AES somewhat even without the crypto extension - then it will now have somewhere to drop in alongside the existing ones.
2021-04-19 05:42:12 +00:00
aes-common.c
aes-select.c
aes-sw.c
Implement AES-GCM using the @openssh.com protocol IDs. I only recently found out that OpenSSH defined their own protocol IDs for AES-GCM, defined to work the same as the standard ones except that they fixed the semantics for how you select the linked cipher+MAC pair during key exchange. (RFC 5647 defines protocol ids for AES-GCM in both the cipher and MAC namespaces, and requires that you MUST select both or neither - but this contradicts the selection policy set out in the base SSH RFCs, and there's no discussion of how you resolve a conflict between them! OpenSSH's answer is to do it the same way ChaCha20-Poly1305 works, because that will ensure the two suites don't fight.) People do occasionally ask us for this linked cipher/MAC pair, and now I know it's actually feasible, I've implemented it, including a pair of vector implementations for x86 and Arm using their respective architecture extensions for multiplying polynomials over GF(2). Unlike ChaCha20-Poly1305, I've kept the cipher and MAC implementations in separate objects, with an arm's-length link between them that the MAC uses when it needs to encrypt single cipher blocks to use as the inputs to the MAC algorithm. That enables the cipher and the MAC to be independently selected from their hardware-accelerated versions, just in case someone runs on a system that has polynomial multiplication instructions but not AES acceleration, or vice versa. There's a fourth implementation of the GCM MAC, which is a pure software implementation of the same algorithm used in the vectorised versions. It's too slow to use live, but I've kept it in the code for future testing needs, and because it's a convenient place to dump my design comments. The vectorised implementations are fairly crude as far as optimisation goes. I'm sure serious x86 _or_ Arm optimisation engineers would look at them and laugh. But GCM is a fast MAC compared to HMAC-SHA-256 (indeed compared to HMAC-anything-at-all), so it should at least be good enough to use. And we've got a working version with some tests now, so if someone else wants to improve them, they can.
2022-08-16 17:36:58 +00:00
aesgcm-common.c
aesgcm-select.c
aesgcm-sw.c
aesgcm-ref-poly.c
arcfour.c
argon2.c
bcrypt.c
blake2.c
blowfish.c
chacha20-poly1305.c
crc32.c
des.c
diffie-hellman.c
dsa.c
ecc-arithmetic.c
ecc-ssh.c
hash_simple.c
hmac.c
mac.c
mac_simple.c
md5.c
mpint.c
ntru.c
openssh-certs.c
prng.c
pubkey-pem.c
pubkey-ppk.c
pubkey-ssh1.c
rsa.c
Break up crypto modules containing HW acceleration. This applies to all of AES, SHA-1, SHA-256 and SHA-512. All those source files previously contained multiple implementations of the algorithm, enabled or disabled by ifdefs detecting whether they would work on a given compiler. And in order to get advanced machine instructions like AES-NI or NEON crypto into the output file when the compile flags hadn't enabled them, we had to do nasty stuff with compiler-specific pragmas or attributes. Now we can do the detection at cmake time, and enable advanced instructions in the more sensible way, by compile-time flags. So I've broken up each of these modules into lots of sub-pieces: a file called (e.g.) 'foo-common.c' containing common definitions across all implementations (such as round constants), one called 'foo-select.c' containing the top-level vtable(s), and a separate file for each implementation exporting just the vtable(s) for that implementation. One advantage of this is that it depends a lot less on compiler- specific bodgery. My particular least favourite part of the previous setup was the part where I had to _manually_ define some Arm ACLE feature macros before including <arm_neon.h>, so that it would define the intrinsics I wanted. Now I'm enabling interesting architecture features in the normal way, on the compiler command line, there's no need for that kind of trick: the right feature macros are already defined and <arm_neon.h> does the right thing. Another change in this reorganisation is that I've stopped assuming there's just one hardware implementation per platform. Previously, the accelerated vtables were called things like sha256_hw, and varied between FOO-NI and NEON depending on platform; and the selection code would simply ask 'is hw available? if so, use hw, else sw'. Now, each HW acceleration strategy names its vtable its own way, and the selection vtable has a whole list of possibilities to iterate over looking for a supported one. So if someone feels like writing a second accelerated implementation of something for a given platform - for example, I've heard you can use plain NEON to speed up AES somewhat even without the crypto extension - then it will now have somewhere to drop in alongside the existing ones.
2021-04-19 05:42:12 +00:00
sha256-common.c
sha256-select.c
sha256-sw.c
sha512-common.c
sha512-select.c
sha512-sw.c
sha3.c
Break up crypto modules containing HW acceleration. This applies to all of AES, SHA-1, SHA-256 and SHA-512. All those source files previously contained multiple implementations of the algorithm, enabled or disabled by ifdefs detecting whether they would work on a given compiler. And in order to get advanced machine instructions like AES-NI or NEON crypto into the output file when the compile flags hadn't enabled them, we had to do nasty stuff with compiler-specific pragmas or attributes. Now we can do the detection at cmake time, and enable advanced instructions in the more sensible way, by compile-time flags. So I've broken up each of these modules into lots of sub-pieces: a file called (e.g.) 'foo-common.c' containing common definitions across all implementations (such as round constants), one called 'foo-select.c' containing the top-level vtable(s), and a separate file for each implementation exporting just the vtable(s) for that implementation. One advantage of this is that it depends a lot less on compiler- specific bodgery. My particular least favourite part of the previous setup was the part where I had to _manually_ define some Arm ACLE feature macros before including <arm_neon.h>, so that it would define the intrinsics I wanted. Now I'm enabling interesting architecture features in the normal way, on the compiler command line, there's no need for that kind of trick: the right feature macros are already defined and <arm_neon.h> does the right thing. Another change in this reorganisation is that I've stopped assuming there's just one hardware implementation per platform. Previously, the accelerated vtables were called things like sha256_hw, and varied between FOO-NI and NEON depending on platform; and the selection code would simply ask 'is hw available? if so, use hw, else sw'. Now, each HW acceleration strategy names its vtable its own way, and the selection vtable has a whole list of possibilities to iterate over looking for a supported one. So if someone feels like writing a second accelerated implementation of something for a given platform - for example, I've heard you can use plain NEON to speed up AES somewhat even without the crypto extension - then it will now have somewhere to drop in alongside the existing ones.
2021-04-19 05:42:12 +00:00
sha1-common.c
sha1-select.c
sha1-sw.c
xdmauth.c)
Break up crypto modules containing HW acceleration. This applies to all of AES, SHA-1, SHA-256 and SHA-512. All those source files previously contained multiple implementations of the algorithm, enabled or disabled by ifdefs detecting whether they would work on a given compiler. And in order to get advanced machine instructions like AES-NI or NEON crypto into the output file when the compile flags hadn't enabled them, we had to do nasty stuff with compiler-specific pragmas or attributes. Now we can do the detection at cmake time, and enable advanced instructions in the more sensible way, by compile-time flags. So I've broken up each of these modules into lots of sub-pieces: a file called (e.g.) 'foo-common.c' containing common definitions across all implementations (such as round constants), one called 'foo-select.c' containing the top-level vtable(s), and a separate file for each implementation exporting just the vtable(s) for that implementation. One advantage of this is that it depends a lot less on compiler- specific bodgery. My particular least favourite part of the previous setup was the part where I had to _manually_ define some Arm ACLE feature macros before including <arm_neon.h>, so that it would define the intrinsics I wanted. Now I'm enabling interesting architecture features in the normal way, on the compiler command line, there's no need for that kind of trick: the right feature macros are already defined and <arm_neon.h> does the right thing. Another change in this reorganisation is that I've stopped assuming there's just one hardware implementation per platform. Previously, the accelerated vtables were called things like sha256_hw, and varied between FOO-NI and NEON depending on platform; and the selection code would simply ask 'is hw available? if so, use hw, else sw'. Now, each HW acceleration strategy names its vtable its own way, and the selection vtable has a whole list of possibilities to iterate over looking for a supported one. So if someone feels like writing a second accelerated implementation of something for a given platform - for example, I've heard you can use plain NEON to speed up AES somewhat even without the crypto extension - then it will now have somewhere to drop in alongside the existing ones.
2021-04-19 05:42:12 +00:00
include(CheckCSourceCompiles)
function(test_compile_with_flags outvar)
cmake_parse_arguments(OPT "" ""
"GNU_FLAGS;MSVC_FLAGS;ADD_SOURCES_IF_SUCCESSFUL;TEST_SOURCE" "${ARGN}")
# Figure out what flags are applicable to this compiler.
set(flags)
if(CMAKE_C_COMPILER_ID MATCHES "GNU" OR
CMAKE_C_COMPILER_ID MATCHES "Clang")
set(flags ${OPT_GNU_FLAGS})
endif()
if(CMAKE_C_COMPILER_ID MATCHES "MSVC")
set(flags ${OPT_MSVC_FLAGS})
endif()
# See if we can compile the provided test program.
foreach(i ${flags})
set(CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS "${CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS} ${i}")
endforeach()
Break up crypto modules containing HW acceleration. This applies to all of AES, SHA-1, SHA-256 and SHA-512. All those source files previously contained multiple implementations of the algorithm, enabled or disabled by ifdefs detecting whether they would work on a given compiler. And in order to get advanced machine instructions like AES-NI or NEON crypto into the output file when the compile flags hadn't enabled them, we had to do nasty stuff with compiler-specific pragmas or attributes. Now we can do the detection at cmake time, and enable advanced instructions in the more sensible way, by compile-time flags. So I've broken up each of these modules into lots of sub-pieces: a file called (e.g.) 'foo-common.c' containing common definitions across all implementations (such as round constants), one called 'foo-select.c' containing the top-level vtable(s), and a separate file for each implementation exporting just the vtable(s) for that implementation. One advantage of this is that it depends a lot less on compiler- specific bodgery. My particular least favourite part of the previous setup was the part where I had to _manually_ define some Arm ACLE feature macros before including <arm_neon.h>, so that it would define the intrinsics I wanted. Now I'm enabling interesting architecture features in the normal way, on the compiler command line, there's no need for that kind of trick: the right feature macros are already defined and <arm_neon.h> does the right thing. Another change in this reorganisation is that I've stopped assuming there's just one hardware implementation per platform. Previously, the accelerated vtables were called things like sha256_hw, and varied between FOO-NI and NEON depending on platform; and the selection code would simply ask 'is hw available? if so, use hw, else sw'. Now, each HW acceleration strategy names its vtable its own way, and the selection vtable has a whole list of possibilities to iterate over looking for a supported one. So if someone feels like writing a second accelerated implementation of something for a given platform - for example, I've heard you can use plain NEON to speed up AES somewhat even without the crypto extension - then it will now have somewhere to drop in alongside the existing ones.
2021-04-19 05:42:12 +00:00
check_c_source_compiles("${OPT_TEST_SOURCE}" "${outvar}")
if(${outvar} AND OPT_ADD_SOURCES_IF_SUCCESSFUL)
# Make an object library that compiles the implementation with the
# necessary flags, and add the resulting objects to the crypto
# library.
set(libname object_lib_${outvar})
add_library(${libname} OBJECT ${OPT_ADD_SOURCES_IF_SUCCESSFUL})
target_compile_options(${libname} PRIVATE ${flags})
target_sources(crypto PRIVATE $<TARGET_OBJECTS:${libname}>)
endif()
# Export the output to the caller's scope, so that further tests can
# be based on it.
set(${outvar} ${${outvar}} PARENT_SCOPE)
endfunction()
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
# Try to enable x86 intrinsics-based crypto implementations.
test_compile_with_flags(HAVE_WMMINTRIN_H
GNU_FLAGS -msse4.1
TEST_SOURCE "
#include <wmmintrin.h>
#include <smmintrin.h>
volatile __m128i r, a, b;
int main(void) { r = _mm_xor_si128(a, b); }")
if(HAVE_WMMINTRIN_H)
test_compile_with_flags(HAVE_AES_NI
GNU_FLAGS -msse4.1 -maes
TEST_SOURCE "
#include <wmmintrin.h>
#include <smmintrin.h>
volatile __m128i r, a, b;
int main(void) { r = _mm_aesenc_si128(a, b); }"
ADD_SOURCES_IF_SUCCESSFUL aes-ni aes-ni.c)
# shaintrin.h doesn't exist on all compilers; sometimes it's folded
# into the other headers
test_compile_with_flags(HAVE_SHAINTRIN_H
GNU_FLAGS -msse4.1 -msha
TEST_SOURCE "
#include <wmmintrin.h>
#include <smmintrin.h>
#include <immintrin.h>
#include <shaintrin.h>
volatile __m128i r, a, b;
int main(void) { r = _mm_xor_si128(a, b); }")
if(HAVE_SHAINTRIN_H)
set(include_shaintrin "#include <shaintrin.h>")
else()
set(include_shaintrin "")
endif()
test_compile_with_flags(HAVE_SHA_NI
GNU_FLAGS -msse4.1 -msha
TEST_SOURCE "
#include <wmmintrin.h>
#include <smmintrin.h>
#include <immintrin.h>
${include_shaintrin}
volatile __m128i r, a, b, c;
int main(void) { r = _mm_sha256rnds2_epu32(a, b, c); }"
ADD_SOURCES_IF_SUCCESSFUL sha256-ni.c sha1-ni.c)
Implement AES-GCM using the @openssh.com protocol IDs. I only recently found out that OpenSSH defined their own protocol IDs for AES-GCM, defined to work the same as the standard ones except that they fixed the semantics for how you select the linked cipher+MAC pair during key exchange. (RFC 5647 defines protocol ids for AES-GCM in both the cipher and MAC namespaces, and requires that you MUST select both or neither - but this contradicts the selection policy set out in the base SSH RFCs, and there's no discussion of how you resolve a conflict between them! OpenSSH's answer is to do it the same way ChaCha20-Poly1305 works, because that will ensure the two suites don't fight.) People do occasionally ask us for this linked cipher/MAC pair, and now I know it's actually feasible, I've implemented it, including a pair of vector implementations for x86 and Arm using their respective architecture extensions for multiplying polynomials over GF(2). Unlike ChaCha20-Poly1305, I've kept the cipher and MAC implementations in separate objects, with an arm's-length link between them that the MAC uses when it needs to encrypt single cipher blocks to use as the inputs to the MAC algorithm. That enables the cipher and the MAC to be independently selected from their hardware-accelerated versions, just in case someone runs on a system that has polynomial multiplication instructions but not AES acceleration, or vice versa. There's a fourth implementation of the GCM MAC, which is a pure software implementation of the same algorithm used in the vectorised versions. It's too slow to use live, but I've kept it in the code for future testing needs, and because it's a convenient place to dump my design comments. The vectorised implementations are fairly crude as far as optimisation goes. I'm sure serious x86 _or_ Arm optimisation engineers would look at them and laugh. But GCM is a fast MAC compared to HMAC-SHA-256 (indeed compared to HMAC-anything-at-all), so it should at least be good enough to use. And we've got a working version with some tests now, so if someone else wants to improve them, they can.
2022-08-16 17:36:58 +00:00
test_compile_with_flags(HAVE_CLMUL
GNU_FLAGS -msse4.1 -mpclmul
TEST_SOURCE "
#include <wmmintrin.h>
#include <tmmintrin.h>
volatile __m128i r, a, b;
int main(void) { r = _mm_clmulepi64_si128(a, b, 5);
r = _mm_shuffle_epi8(r, a); }"
ADD_SOURCES_IF_SUCCESSFUL aesgcm-clmul.c)
Break up crypto modules containing HW acceleration. This applies to all of AES, SHA-1, SHA-256 and SHA-512. All those source files previously contained multiple implementations of the algorithm, enabled or disabled by ifdefs detecting whether they would work on a given compiler. And in order to get advanced machine instructions like AES-NI or NEON crypto into the output file when the compile flags hadn't enabled them, we had to do nasty stuff with compiler-specific pragmas or attributes. Now we can do the detection at cmake time, and enable advanced instructions in the more sensible way, by compile-time flags. So I've broken up each of these modules into lots of sub-pieces: a file called (e.g.) 'foo-common.c' containing common definitions across all implementations (such as round constants), one called 'foo-select.c' containing the top-level vtable(s), and a separate file for each implementation exporting just the vtable(s) for that implementation. One advantage of this is that it depends a lot less on compiler- specific bodgery. My particular least favourite part of the previous setup was the part where I had to _manually_ define some Arm ACLE feature macros before including <arm_neon.h>, so that it would define the intrinsics I wanted. Now I'm enabling interesting architecture features in the normal way, on the compiler command line, there's no need for that kind of trick: the right feature macros are already defined and <arm_neon.h> does the right thing. Another change in this reorganisation is that I've stopped assuming there's just one hardware implementation per platform. Previously, the accelerated vtables were called things like sha256_hw, and varied between FOO-NI and NEON depending on platform; and the selection code would simply ask 'is hw available? if so, use hw, else sw'. Now, each HW acceleration strategy names its vtable its own way, and the selection vtable has a whole list of possibilities to iterate over looking for a supported one. So if someone feels like writing a second accelerated implementation of something for a given platform - for example, I've heard you can use plain NEON to speed up AES somewhat even without the crypto extension - then it will now have somewhere to drop in alongside the existing ones.
2021-04-19 05:42:12 +00:00
endif()
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
# Try to enable Arm Neon intrinsics-based crypto implementations.
# Start by checking which header file we need. ACLE specifies that it
# ought to be <arm_neon.h>, on both 32- and 64-bit Arm, but Visual
# Studio for some reason renamed the header to <arm64_neon.h> in
# 64-bit, and gives an error if you use the standard name. (However,
# clang-cl does let you use the standard name.)
test_compile_with_flags(HAVE_ARM_NEON_H
MSVC_FLAGS -D_ARM_USE_NEW_NEON_INTRINSICS
TEST_SOURCE "
#include <arm_neon.h>
volatile uint8x16_t r, a, b;
int main(void) { r = veorq_u8(a, b); }")
if(HAVE_ARM_NEON_H)
set(neon ON)
set(neon_header "arm_neon.h")
else()
test_compile_with_flags(HAVE_ARM64_NEON_H TEST_SOURCE "
#include <arm64_neon.h>
volatile uint8x16_t r, a, b;
int main(void) { r = veorq_u8(a, b); }")
if(HAVE_ARM64_NEON_H)
set(neon ON)
set(neon_header "arm64_neon.h")
set(USE_ARM64_NEON_H ON)
endif()
endif()
if(neon)
# If we have _some_ NEON header, look for the individual things we
# can enable with it.
# The 'crypto' architecture extension includes support for AES,
# SHA-1, and SHA-256.
test_compile_with_flags(HAVE_NEON_CRYPTO
GNU_FLAGS -march=armv8-a+crypto
MSVC_FLAGS -D_ARM_USE_NEW_NEON_INTRINSICS
TEST_SOURCE "
#include <${neon_header}>
volatile uint8x16_t r, a, b;
volatile uint32x4_t s, x, y, z;
int main(void) { r = vaeseq_u8(a, b); s = vsha256hq_u32(x, y, z); }"
ADD_SOURCES_IF_SUCCESSFUL aes-neon.c sha256-neon.c sha1-neon.c)
Implement AES-GCM using the @openssh.com protocol IDs. I only recently found out that OpenSSH defined their own protocol IDs for AES-GCM, defined to work the same as the standard ones except that they fixed the semantics for how you select the linked cipher+MAC pair during key exchange. (RFC 5647 defines protocol ids for AES-GCM in both the cipher and MAC namespaces, and requires that you MUST select both or neither - but this contradicts the selection policy set out in the base SSH RFCs, and there's no discussion of how you resolve a conflict between them! OpenSSH's answer is to do it the same way ChaCha20-Poly1305 works, because that will ensure the two suites don't fight.) People do occasionally ask us for this linked cipher/MAC pair, and now I know it's actually feasible, I've implemented it, including a pair of vector implementations for x86 and Arm using their respective architecture extensions for multiplying polynomials over GF(2). Unlike ChaCha20-Poly1305, I've kept the cipher and MAC implementations in separate objects, with an arm's-length link between them that the MAC uses when it needs to encrypt single cipher blocks to use as the inputs to the MAC algorithm. That enables the cipher and the MAC to be independently selected from their hardware-accelerated versions, just in case someone runs on a system that has polynomial multiplication instructions but not AES acceleration, or vice versa. There's a fourth implementation of the GCM MAC, which is a pure software implementation of the same algorithm used in the vectorised versions. It's too slow to use live, but I've kept it in the code for future testing needs, and because it's a convenient place to dump my design comments. The vectorised implementations are fairly crude as far as optimisation goes. I'm sure serious x86 _or_ Arm optimisation engineers would look at them and laugh. But GCM is a fast MAC compared to HMAC-SHA-256 (indeed compared to HMAC-anything-at-all), so it should at least be good enough to use. And we've got a working version with some tests now, so if someone else wants to improve them, they can.
2022-08-16 17:36:58 +00:00
test_compile_with_flags(HAVE_NEON_PMULL
GNU_FLAGS -march=armv8-a+crypto
MSVC_FLAGS -D_ARM_USE_NEW_NEON_INTRINSICS
TEST_SOURCE "
#include <${neon_header}>
volatile poly128_t r;
volatile poly64_t a, b;
volatile poly64x2_t u, v;
int main(void) { r = vmull_p64(a, b); r = vmull_high_p64(u, v); }"
ADD_SOURCES_IF_SUCCESSFUL aesgcm-neon.c)
Break up crypto modules containing HW acceleration. This applies to all of AES, SHA-1, SHA-256 and SHA-512. All those source files previously contained multiple implementations of the algorithm, enabled or disabled by ifdefs detecting whether they would work on a given compiler. And in order to get advanced machine instructions like AES-NI or NEON crypto into the output file when the compile flags hadn't enabled them, we had to do nasty stuff with compiler-specific pragmas or attributes. Now we can do the detection at cmake time, and enable advanced instructions in the more sensible way, by compile-time flags. So I've broken up each of these modules into lots of sub-pieces: a file called (e.g.) 'foo-common.c' containing common definitions across all implementations (such as round constants), one called 'foo-select.c' containing the top-level vtable(s), and a separate file for each implementation exporting just the vtable(s) for that implementation. One advantage of this is that it depends a lot less on compiler- specific bodgery. My particular least favourite part of the previous setup was the part where I had to _manually_ define some Arm ACLE feature macros before including <arm_neon.h>, so that it would define the intrinsics I wanted. Now I'm enabling interesting architecture features in the normal way, on the compiler command line, there's no need for that kind of trick: the right feature macros are already defined and <arm_neon.h> does the right thing. Another change in this reorganisation is that I've stopped assuming there's just one hardware implementation per platform. Previously, the accelerated vtables were called things like sha256_hw, and varied between FOO-NI and NEON depending on platform; and the selection code would simply ask 'is hw available? if so, use hw, else sw'. Now, each HW acceleration strategy names its vtable its own way, and the selection vtable has a whole list of possibilities to iterate over looking for a supported one. So if someone feels like writing a second accelerated implementation of something for a given platform - for example, I've heard you can use plain NEON to speed up AES somewhat even without the crypto extension - then it will now have somewhere to drop in alongside the existing ones.
2021-04-19 05:42:12 +00:00
# The 'sha3' architecture extension, despite the name, includes
# support for SHA-512 (from the SHA-2 standard) as well as SHA-3
# proper.
#
# Versions of clang up to and including clang 12 support this
# extension in assembly language, but not the ACLE intrinsics for
# it. So we check both.
test_compile_with_flags(HAVE_NEON_SHA512_INTRINSICS
GNU_FLAGS -march=armv8.2-a+crypto+sha3
TEST_SOURCE "
#include <${neon_header}>
volatile uint64x2_t r, a, b;
int main(void) { r = vsha512su0q_u64(a, b); }"
ADD_SOURCES_IF_SUCCESSFUL sha512-neon.c)
if(HAVE_NEON_SHA512_INTRINSICS)
set(HAVE_NEON_SHA512 ON)
else()
test_compile_with_flags(HAVE_NEON_SHA512_ASM
GNU_FLAGS -march=armv8.2-a+crypto+sha3
TEST_SOURCE "
#include <${neon_header}>
volatile uint64x2_t r, a;
int main(void) { __asm__(\"sha512su0 %0.2D,%1.2D\" : \"+w\" (r) : \"w\" (a)); }"
ADD_SOURCES_IF_SUCCESSFUL sha512-neon.c)
if(HAVE_NEON_SHA512_ASM)
set(HAVE_NEON_SHA512 ON)
endif()
endif()
endif()
set(HAVE_AES_NI ${HAVE_AES_NI} PARENT_SCOPE)
set(HAVE_SHA_NI ${HAVE_SHA_NI} PARENT_SCOPE)
set(HAVE_SHAINTRIN_H ${HAVE_SHAINTRIN_H} PARENT_SCOPE)
set(HAVE_NEON_CRYPTO ${HAVE_NEON_CRYPTO} PARENT_SCOPE)
set(HAVE_NEON_SHA512 ${HAVE_NEON_SHA512} PARENT_SCOPE)
set(HAVE_NEON_SHA512_INTRINSICS ${HAVE_NEON_SHA512_INTRINSICS} PARENT_SCOPE)
set(USE_ARM64_NEON_H ${USE_ARM64_NEON_H} PARENT_SCOPE)