nhyatt/putty-source
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.tartarus.org/simon/putty.git synced 2025-01-10 09:58:01 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
e3272f19e0
putty-source/cmake/gitcommit.cmake

62 lines
1.9 KiB
CMake
Raw Normal View History

Update source file names in comments and docs. Correcting a source file name in the docs just now reminded me that I've seen a lot of outdated source file names elsewhere in the code, due to all the reorganisation since we moved to cmake. Here's a giant pass of trying to make them all accurate again.
2022-01-22 15:38:53 +00:00
# Pure cmake script to write out cmake_commit.c and cmake_version.but
Replace mkfiles.pl with a CMake build system. This brings various concrete advantages over the previous system: - consistent support for out-of-tree builds on all platforms - more thorough support for Visual Studio IDE project files - support for Ninja-based builds, which is particularly useful on Windows where the alternative nmake has no parallel option - a really simple set of build instructions that work the same way on all the major platforms (look how much shorter README is!) - better decoupling of the project configuration from the toolchain configuration, so that my Windows cross-building doesn't need (much) special treatment in CMakeLists.txt - configure-time tests on Windows as well as Linux, so that a lot of ad-hoc #ifdefs second-guessing a particular feature's presence from the compiler version can now be replaced by tests of the feature itself Also some longer-term software-engineering advantages: - other people have actually heard of CMake, so they'll be able to produce patches to the new build setup more easily - unlike the old mkfiles.pl, CMake is not my personal problem to maintain - most importantly, mkfiles.pl was just a horrible pile of unmaintainable cruft, which even I found it painful to make changes to or to use, and desperately needed throwing in the bin. I've already thrown away all the variants of it I had in other projects of mine, and was only delaying this one so we could make the 0.75 release branch first. This change comes with a noticeable build-level restructuring. The previous Recipe worked by compiling every object file exactly once, and then making each executable by linking a precisely specified subset of the same object files. But in CMake, that's not the natural way to work - if you write the obvious command that puts the same source file into two executable targets, CMake generates a makefile that compiles it once per target. That can be an advantage, because it gives you the freedom to compile it differently in each case (e.g. with a #define telling it which program it's part of). But in a project that has many executable targets and had carefully contrived to _never_ need to build any module more than once, all it does is bloat the build time pointlessly! To avoid slowing down the build by a large factor, I've put most of the modules of the code base into a collection of static libraries organised vaguely thematically (SSH, other backends, crypto, network, ...). That means all those modules can still be compiled just once each, because once each library is built it's reused unchanged for all the executable targets. One upside of this library-based structure is that now I don't have to manually specify exactly which objects go into which programs any more - it's enough to specify which libraries are needed, and the linker will figure out the fine detail automatically. So there's less maintenance to do in CMakeLists.txt when the source code changes. But that reorganisation also adds fragility, because of the trad Unix linker semantics of walking along the library list once each, so that cyclic references between your libraries will provoke link errors. The current setup builds successfully, but I suspect it only just manages it. (In particular, I've found that MinGW is the most finicky on this score of the Windows compilers I've tried building with. So I've included a MinGW test build in the new-look Buildscr, because otherwise I think there'd be a significant risk of introducing MinGW-only build failures due to library search order, which wasn't a risk in the previous library-free build organisation.) In the longer term I hope to be able to reduce the risk of that, via gradual reorganisation (in particular, breaking up too-monolithic modules, to reduce the risk of knock-on references when you included a module for function A and it also contains function B with an unsatisfied dependency you didn't really need). Ideally I want to reach a state in which the libraries all have sensibly described purposes, a clearly documented (partial) order in which they're permitted to depend on each other, and a specification of what stubs you have to put where if you're leaving one of them out (e.g. nocrypto) and what callbacks you have to define in your non-library objects to satisfy dependencies from things low in the stack (e.g. out_of_memory()). One thing that's gone completely missing in this migration, unfortunately, is the unfinished MacOS port linked against Quartz GTK. That's because it turned out that I can't currently build it myself, on my own Mac: my previous installation of GTK had bit-rotted as a side effect of an Xcode upgrade, and I haven't yet been able to persuade jhbuild to make me a new one. So I can't even build the MacOS port with the _old_ makefiles, and hence, I have no way of checking that the new ones also work. I hope to bring that port back to life at some point, but I don't want it to block the rest of this change.
2021-04-10 14:21:11 +00:00
set(DEFAULT_COMMIT "unavailable")
set(commit "${DEFAULT_COMMIT}")
gitcommit.cmake: stop needing TOPLEVEL_SOURCE_DIR. It's always the same as the cwd when the script is invoked, and by having the script get it _from_ its own cwd, we arrange a bit of automatic normalisation in situations where you need to invoke it with some non-canonical path like one ending in "/.." - which I'll do in the next commit.
2021-05-08 09:24:14 +00:00
set(TOPLEVEL_SOURCE_DIR ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR})
Replace mkfiles.pl with a CMake build system. This brings various concrete advantages over the previous system: - consistent support for out-of-tree builds on all platforms - more thorough support for Visual Studio IDE project files - support for Ninja-based builds, which is particularly useful on Windows where the alternative nmake has no parallel option - a really simple set of build instructions that work the same way on all the major platforms (look how much shorter README is!) - better decoupling of the project configuration from the toolchain configuration, so that my Windows cross-building doesn't need (much) special treatment in CMakeLists.txt - configure-time tests on Windows as well as Linux, so that a lot of ad-hoc #ifdefs second-guessing a particular feature's presence from the compiler version can now be replaced by tests of the feature itself Also some longer-term software-engineering advantages: - other people have actually heard of CMake, so they'll be able to produce patches to the new build setup more easily - unlike the old mkfiles.pl, CMake is not my personal problem to maintain - most importantly, mkfiles.pl was just a horrible pile of unmaintainable cruft, which even I found it painful to make changes to or to use, and desperately needed throwing in the bin. I've already thrown away all the variants of it I had in other projects of mine, and was only delaying this one so we could make the 0.75 release branch first. This change comes with a noticeable build-level restructuring. The previous Recipe worked by compiling every object file exactly once, and then making each executable by linking a precisely specified subset of the same object files. But in CMake, that's not the natural way to work - if you write the obvious command that puts the same source file into two executable targets, CMake generates a makefile that compiles it once per target. That can be an advantage, because it gives you the freedom to compile it differently in each case (e.g. with a #define telling it which program it's part of). But in a project that has many executable targets and had carefully contrived to _never_ need to build any module more than once, all it does is bloat the build time pointlessly! To avoid slowing down the build by a large factor, I've put most of the modules of the code base into a collection of static libraries organised vaguely thematically (SSH, other backends, crypto, network, ...). That means all those modules can still be compiled just once each, because once each library is built it's reused unchanged for all the executable targets. One upside of this library-based structure is that now I don't have to manually specify exactly which objects go into which programs any more - it's enough to specify which libraries are needed, and the linker will figure out the fine detail automatically. So there's less maintenance to do in CMakeLists.txt when the source code changes. But that reorganisation also adds fragility, because of the trad Unix linker semantics of walking along the library list once each, so that cyclic references between your libraries will provoke link errors. The current setup builds successfully, but I suspect it only just manages it. (In particular, I've found that MinGW is the most finicky on this score of the Windows compilers I've tried building with. So I've included a MinGW test build in the new-look Buildscr, because otherwise I think there'd be a significant risk of introducing MinGW-only build failures due to library search order, which wasn't a risk in the previous library-free build organisation.) In the longer term I hope to be able to reduce the risk of that, via gradual reorganisation (in particular, breaking up too-monolithic modules, to reduce the risk of knock-on references when you included a module for function A and it also contains function B with an unsatisfied dependency you didn't really need). Ideally I want to reach a state in which the libraries all have sensibly described purposes, a clearly documented (partial) order in which they're permitted to depend on each other, and a specification of what stubs you have to put where if you're leaving one of them out (e.g. nocrypto) and what callbacks you have to define in your non-library objects to satisfy dependencies from things low in the stack (e.g. out_of_memory()). One thing that's gone completely missing in this migration, unfortunately, is the unfinished MacOS port linked against Quartz GTK. That's because it turned out that I can't currently build it myself, on my own Mac: my previous installation of GTK had bit-rotted as a side effect of an Xcode upgrade, and I haven't yet been able to persuade jhbuild to make me a new one. So I can't even build the MacOS port with the _old_ makefiles, and hence, I have no way of checking that the new ones also work. I hope to bring that port back to life at some point, but I don't want it to block the rest of this change.
2021-04-10 14:21:11 +00:00
execute_process(
gitcommit.cmake: work around Windows pathname aliasing. The cmake script that determines the current git head commit, in order to bake it into the binaries for development builds from a git checkout, wasn't working reliably on Windows: sometimes it reported that the source directory didn't seem to be a git repository, when in fact it was. This occurred because gitcommit.cmake starts by trying to work out _whether_ the source directory is the top level of a git worktree at all, by the technique of running `git rev-parse --show-toplevel` (to print the top-level path of the git worktree _containing_ $PWD, if any) and comparing it with ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}. But the comparison was done as a plain string, which leads to problems if more than one string can represent the same actual directory. On Windows, this can occur for two reasons that I know of. One reason is related to Windows itself: if you map a network file server path to a local drive letter, then the same directory is accessible as a UNC path (e.g. \\hostname\share\subdir) and via the drive letter (e.g. N:\subdir). And it can happen that CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR and git's output disagree on which representation to use, causing the string comparison to return a false negative. (This can also affect filesystems in a WSL instance, accessed from native Windows via \\wsl$\instance\path, because Windows implements that as a network file share even though the network in question is purely in the imagination of that one machine.) The other reason is related more specifically to git, because some versions of Windows git are built on top of MSYS or MINGW or that kind of shim layer, and model Windows drive letters as subdirectories of a Unixlike VFS root. So you might also find that the two strings disagree on whether you're in C:\Users\alice\src\putty or /c/Users/alice/src/putty. I think this commit should work around both of these problems. Reading the man page for `git rev-parse` more carefully, it has an option `--show-cdup`, which returns a _relative_ path from $PWD to the top-level directory of the worktree: that is, it will be a sequence of `../../..` as long as necessary, including length zero. So you can use that to directly query whether you're at the top of a git worktree: if `git rev-parse --show-cdup` returns the empty string and a success status, then you are. (If you're deeper in a worktree it will return a non-empty string, and if you're not in a worktree at all it will return a failure status and print an error message to stderr.)
2024-12-27 10:07:32 +00:00
COMMAND ${GIT_EXECUTABLE} rev-parse --show-cdup
OUTPUT_VARIABLE path_to_top
Replace mkfiles.pl with a CMake build system. This brings various concrete advantages over the previous system: - consistent support for out-of-tree builds on all platforms - more thorough support for Visual Studio IDE project files - support for Ninja-based builds, which is particularly useful on Windows where the alternative nmake has no parallel option - a really simple set of build instructions that work the same way on all the major platforms (look how much shorter README is!) - better decoupling of the project configuration from the toolchain configuration, so that my Windows cross-building doesn't need (much) special treatment in CMakeLists.txt - configure-time tests on Windows as well as Linux, so that a lot of ad-hoc #ifdefs second-guessing a particular feature's presence from the compiler version can now be replaced by tests of the feature itself Also some longer-term software-engineering advantages: - other people have actually heard of CMake, so they'll be able to produce patches to the new build setup more easily - unlike the old mkfiles.pl, CMake is not my personal problem to maintain - most importantly, mkfiles.pl was just a horrible pile of unmaintainable cruft, which even I found it painful to make changes to or to use, and desperately needed throwing in the bin. I've already thrown away all the variants of it I had in other projects of mine, and was only delaying this one so we could make the 0.75 release branch first. This change comes with a noticeable build-level restructuring. The previous Recipe worked by compiling every object file exactly once, and then making each executable by linking a precisely specified subset of the same object files. But in CMake, that's not the natural way to work - if you write the obvious command that puts the same source file into two executable targets, CMake generates a makefile that compiles it once per target. That can be an advantage, because it gives you the freedom to compile it differently in each case (e.g. with a #define telling it which program it's part of). But in a project that has many executable targets and had carefully contrived to _never_ need to build any module more than once, all it does is bloat the build time pointlessly! To avoid slowing down the build by a large factor, I've put most of the modules of the code base into a collection of static libraries organised vaguely thematically (SSH, other backends, crypto, network, ...). That means all those modules can still be compiled just once each, because once each library is built it's reused unchanged for all the executable targets. One upside of this library-based structure is that now I don't have to manually specify exactly which objects go into which programs any more - it's enough to specify which libraries are needed, and the linker will figure out the fine detail automatically. So there's less maintenance to do in CMakeLists.txt when the source code changes. But that reorganisation also adds fragility, because of the trad Unix linker semantics of walking along the library list once each, so that cyclic references between your libraries will provoke link errors. The current setup builds successfully, but I suspect it only just manages it. (In particular, I've found that MinGW is the most finicky on this score of the Windows compilers I've tried building with. So I've included a MinGW test build in the new-look Buildscr, because otherwise I think there'd be a significant risk of introducing MinGW-only build failures due to library search order, which wasn't a risk in the previous library-free build organisation.) In the longer term I hope to be able to reduce the risk of that, via gradual reorganisation (in particular, breaking up too-monolithic modules, to reduce the risk of knock-on references when you included a module for function A and it also contains function B with an unsatisfied dependency you didn't really need). Ideally I want to reach a state in which the libraries all have sensibly described purposes, a clearly documented (partial) order in which they're permitted to depend on each other, and a specification of what stubs you have to put where if you're leaving one of them out (e.g. nocrypto) and what callbacks you have to define in your non-library objects to satisfy dependencies from things low in the stack (e.g. out_of_memory()). One thing that's gone completely missing in this migration, unfortunately, is the unfinished MacOS port linked against Quartz GTK. That's because it turned out that I can't currently build it myself, on my own Mac: my previous installation of GTK had bit-rotted as a side effect of an Xcode upgrade, and I haven't yet been able to persuade jhbuild to make me a new one. So I can't even build the MacOS port with the _old_ makefiles, and hence, I have no way of checking that the new ones also work. I hope to bring that port back to life at some point, but I don't want it to block the rest of this change.
2021-04-10 14:21:11 +00:00
ERROR_VARIABLE stderr
RESULT_VARIABLE status)
gitcommit.cmake: work around Windows pathname aliasing. The cmake script that determines the current git head commit, in order to bake it into the binaries for development builds from a git checkout, wasn't working reliably on Windows: sometimes it reported that the source directory didn't seem to be a git repository, when in fact it was. This occurred because gitcommit.cmake starts by trying to work out _whether_ the source directory is the top level of a git worktree at all, by the technique of running `git rev-parse --show-toplevel` (to print the top-level path of the git worktree _containing_ $PWD, if any) and comparing it with ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}. But the comparison was done as a plain string, which leads to problems if more than one string can represent the same actual directory. On Windows, this can occur for two reasons that I know of. One reason is related to Windows itself: if you map a network file server path to a local drive letter, then the same directory is accessible as a UNC path (e.g. \\hostname\share\subdir) and via the drive letter (e.g. N:\subdir). And it can happen that CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR and git's output disagree on which representation to use, causing the string comparison to return a false negative. (This can also affect filesystems in a WSL instance, accessed from native Windows via \\wsl$\instance\path, because Windows implements that as a network file share even though the network in question is purely in the imagination of that one machine.) The other reason is related more specifically to git, because some versions of Windows git are built on top of MSYS or MINGW or that kind of shim layer, and model Windows drive letters as subdirectories of a Unixlike VFS root. So you might also find that the two strings disagree on whether you're in C:\Users\alice\src\putty or /c/Users/alice/src/putty. I think this commit should work around both of these problems. Reading the man page for `git rev-parse` more carefully, it has an option `--show-cdup`, which returns a _relative_ path from $PWD to the top-level directory of the worktree: that is, it will be a sequence of `../../..` as long as necessary, including length zero. So you can use that to directly query whether you're at the top of a git worktree: if `git rev-parse --show-cdup` returns the empty string and a success status, then you are. (If you're deeper in a worktree it will return a non-empty string, and if you're not in a worktree at all it will return a failure status and print an error message to stderr.)
2024-12-27 10:07:32 +00:00
string(REGEX REPLACE "\n$" "" path_to_top "${path_to_top}")
Replace mkfiles.pl with a CMake build system. This brings various concrete advantages over the previous system: - consistent support for out-of-tree builds on all platforms - more thorough support for Visual Studio IDE project files - support for Ninja-based builds, which is particularly useful on Windows where the alternative nmake has no parallel option - a really simple set of build instructions that work the same way on all the major platforms (look how much shorter README is!) - better decoupling of the project configuration from the toolchain configuration, so that my Windows cross-building doesn't need (much) special treatment in CMakeLists.txt - configure-time tests on Windows as well as Linux, so that a lot of ad-hoc #ifdefs second-guessing a particular feature's presence from the compiler version can now be replaced by tests of the feature itself Also some longer-term software-engineering advantages: - other people have actually heard of CMake, so they'll be able to produce patches to the new build setup more easily - unlike the old mkfiles.pl, CMake is not my personal problem to maintain - most importantly, mkfiles.pl was just a horrible pile of unmaintainable cruft, which even I found it painful to make changes to or to use, and desperately needed throwing in the bin. I've already thrown away all the variants of it I had in other projects of mine, and was only delaying this one so we could make the 0.75 release branch first. This change comes with a noticeable build-level restructuring. The previous Recipe worked by compiling every object file exactly once, and then making each executable by linking a precisely specified subset of the same object files. But in CMake, that's not the natural way to work - if you write the obvious command that puts the same source file into two executable targets, CMake generates a makefile that compiles it once per target. That can be an advantage, because it gives you the freedom to compile it differently in each case (e.g. with a #define telling it which program it's part of). But in a project that has many executable targets and had carefully contrived to _never_ need to build any module more than once, all it does is bloat the build time pointlessly! To avoid slowing down the build by a large factor, I've put most of the modules of the code base into a collection of static libraries organised vaguely thematically (SSH, other backends, crypto, network, ...). That means all those modules can still be compiled just once each, because once each library is built it's reused unchanged for all the executable targets. One upside of this library-based structure is that now I don't have to manually specify exactly which objects go into which programs any more - it's enough to specify which libraries are needed, and the linker will figure out the fine detail automatically. So there's less maintenance to do in CMakeLists.txt when the source code changes. But that reorganisation also adds fragility, because of the trad Unix linker semantics of walking along the library list once each, so that cyclic references between your libraries will provoke link errors. The current setup builds successfully, but I suspect it only just manages it. (In particular, I've found that MinGW is the most finicky on this score of the Windows compilers I've tried building with. So I've included a MinGW test build in the new-look Buildscr, because otherwise I think there'd be a significant risk of introducing MinGW-only build failures due to library search order, which wasn't a risk in the previous library-free build organisation.) In the longer term I hope to be able to reduce the risk of that, via gradual reorganisation (in particular, breaking up too-monolithic modules, to reduce the risk of knock-on references when you included a module for function A and it also contains function B with an unsatisfied dependency you didn't really need). Ideally I want to reach a state in which the libraries all have sensibly described purposes, a clearly documented (partial) order in which they're permitted to depend on each other, and a specification of what stubs you have to put where if you're leaving one of them out (e.g. nocrypto) and what callbacks you have to define in your non-library objects to satisfy dependencies from things low in the stack (e.g. out_of_memory()). One thing that's gone completely missing in this migration, unfortunately, is the unfinished MacOS port linked against Quartz GTK. That's because it turned out that I can't currently build it myself, on my own Mac: my previous installation of GTK had bit-rotted as a side effect of an Xcode upgrade, and I haven't yet been able to persuade jhbuild to make me a new one. So I can't even build the MacOS port with the _old_ makefiles, and hence, I have no way of checking that the new ones also work. I hope to bring that port back to life at some point, but I don't want it to block the rest of this change.
2021-04-10 14:21:11 +00:00
gitcommit.cmake: work around Windows pathname aliasing. The cmake script that determines the current git head commit, in order to bake it into the binaries for development builds from a git checkout, wasn't working reliably on Windows: sometimes it reported that the source directory didn't seem to be a git repository, when in fact it was. This occurred because gitcommit.cmake starts by trying to work out _whether_ the source directory is the top level of a git worktree at all, by the technique of running `git rev-parse --show-toplevel` (to print the top-level path of the git worktree _containing_ $PWD, if any) and comparing it with ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}. But the comparison was done as a plain string, which leads to problems if more than one string can represent the same actual directory. On Windows, this can occur for two reasons that I know of. One reason is related to Windows itself: if you map a network file server path to a local drive letter, then the same directory is accessible as a UNC path (e.g. \\hostname\share\subdir) and via the drive letter (e.g. N:\subdir). And it can happen that CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR and git's output disagree on which representation to use, causing the string comparison to return a false negative. (This can also affect filesystems in a WSL instance, accessed from native Windows via \\wsl$\instance\path, because Windows implements that as a network file share even though the network in question is purely in the imagination of that one machine.) The other reason is related more specifically to git, because some versions of Windows git are built on top of MSYS or MINGW or that kind of shim layer, and model Windows drive letters as subdirectories of a Unixlike VFS root. So you might also find that the two strings disagree on whether you're in C:\Users\alice\src\putty or /c/Users/alice/src/putty. I think this commit should work around both of these problems. Reading the man page for `git rev-parse` more carefully, it has an option `--show-cdup`, which returns a _relative_ path from $PWD to the top-level directory of the worktree: that is, it will be a sequence of `../../..` as long as necessary, including length zero. So you can use that to directly query whether you're at the top of a git worktree: if `git rev-parse --show-cdup` returns the empty string and a success status, then you are. (If you're deeper in a worktree it will return a non-empty string, and if you're not in a worktree at all it will return a failure status and print an error message to stderr.)
2024-12-27 10:07:32 +00:00
# If we're at the top of a git repository, --show-cdup will print the
# empty string (followed by a newline) and return success. If we're
# lower down, it will return a sequence of "../../" that leads to the
# top; if we're higher up it will fail with an error.
if(status EQUAL 0 AND path_to_top STREQUAL "")
execute_process(
COMMAND ${GIT_EXECUTABLE} rev-parse HEAD
OUTPUT_VARIABLE git_commit
ERROR_VARIABLE stderr
RESULT_VARIABLE status)
if(status EQUAL 0)
string(REGEX REPLACE "\n$" "" commit "${git_commit}")
Replace mkfiles.pl with a CMake build system. This brings various concrete advantages over the previous system: - consistent support for out-of-tree builds on all platforms - more thorough support for Visual Studio IDE project files - support for Ninja-based builds, which is particularly useful on Windows where the alternative nmake has no parallel option - a really simple set of build instructions that work the same way on all the major platforms (look how much shorter README is!) - better decoupling of the project configuration from the toolchain configuration, so that my Windows cross-building doesn't need (much) special treatment in CMakeLists.txt - configure-time tests on Windows as well as Linux, so that a lot of ad-hoc #ifdefs second-guessing a particular feature's presence from the compiler version can now be replaced by tests of the feature itself Also some longer-term software-engineering advantages: - other people have actually heard of CMake, so they'll be able to produce patches to the new build setup more easily - unlike the old mkfiles.pl, CMake is not my personal problem to maintain - most importantly, mkfiles.pl was just a horrible pile of unmaintainable cruft, which even I found it painful to make changes to or to use, and desperately needed throwing in the bin. I've already thrown away all the variants of it I had in other projects of mine, and was only delaying this one so we could make the 0.75 release branch first. This change comes with a noticeable build-level restructuring. The previous Recipe worked by compiling every object file exactly once, and then making each executable by linking a precisely specified subset of the same object files. But in CMake, that's not the natural way to work - if you write the obvious command that puts the same source file into two executable targets, CMake generates a makefile that compiles it once per target. That can be an advantage, because it gives you the freedom to compile it differently in each case (e.g. with a #define telling it which program it's part of). But in a project that has many executable targets and had carefully contrived to _never_ need to build any module more than once, all it does is bloat the build time pointlessly! To avoid slowing down the build by a large factor, I've put most of the modules of the code base into a collection of static libraries organised vaguely thematically (SSH, other backends, crypto, network, ...). That means all those modules can still be compiled just once each, because once each library is built it's reused unchanged for all the executable targets. One upside of this library-based structure is that now I don't have to manually specify exactly which objects go into which programs any more - it's enough to specify which libraries are needed, and the linker will figure out the fine detail automatically. So there's less maintenance to do in CMakeLists.txt when the source code changes. But that reorganisation also adds fragility, because of the trad Unix linker semantics of walking along the library list once each, so that cyclic references between your libraries will provoke link errors. The current setup builds successfully, but I suspect it only just manages it. (In particular, I've found that MinGW is the most finicky on this score of the Windows compilers I've tried building with. So I've included a MinGW test build in the new-look Buildscr, because otherwise I think there'd be a significant risk of introducing MinGW-only build failures due to library search order, which wasn't a risk in the previous library-free build organisation.) In the longer term I hope to be able to reduce the risk of that, via gradual reorganisation (in particular, breaking up too-monolithic modules, to reduce the risk of knock-on references when you included a module for function A and it also contains function B with an unsatisfied dependency you didn't really need). Ideally I want to reach a state in which the libraries all have sensibly described purposes, a clearly documented (partial) order in which they're permitted to depend on each other, and a specification of what stubs you have to put where if you're leaving one of them out (e.g. nocrypto) and what callbacks you have to define in your non-library objects to satisfy dependencies from things low in the stack (e.g. out_of_memory()). One thing that's gone completely missing in this migration, unfortunately, is the unfinished MacOS port linked against Quartz GTK. That's because it turned out that I can't currently build it myself, on my own Mac: my previous installation of GTK had bit-rotted as a side effect of an Xcode upgrade, and I haven't yet been able to persuade jhbuild to make me a new one. So I can't even build the MacOS port with the _old_ makefiles, and hence, I have no way of checking that the new ones also work. I hope to bring that port back to life at some point, but I don't want it to block the rest of this change.
2021-04-10 14:21:11 +00:00
else()
if(commit STREQUAL "unavailable")
gitcommit.cmake: work around Windows pathname aliasing. The cmake script that determines the current git head commit, in order to bake it into the binaries for development builds from a git checkout, wasn't working reliably on Windows: sometimes it reported that the source directory didn't seem to be a git repository, when in fact it was. This occurred because gitcommit.cmake starts by trying to work out _whether_ the source directory is the top level of a git worktree at all, by the technique of running `git rev-parse --show-toplevel` (to print the top-level path of the git worktree _containing_ $PWD, if any) and comparing it with ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}. But the comparison was done as a plain string, which leads to problems if more than one string can represent the same actual directory. On Windows, this can occur for two reasons that I know of. One reason is related to Windows itself: if you map a network file server path to a local drive letter, then the same directory is accessible as a UNC path (e.g. \\hostname\share\subdir) and via the drive letter (e.g. N:\subdir). And it can happen that CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR and git's output disagree on which representation to use, causing the string comparison to return a false negative. (This can also affect filesystems in a WSL instance, accessed from native Windows via \\wsl$\instance\path, because Windows implements that as a network file share even though the network in question is purely in the imagination of that one machine.) The other reason is related more specifically to git, because some versions of Windows git are built on top of MSYS or MINGW or that kind of shim layer, and model Windows drive letters as subdirectories of a Unixlike VFS root. So you might also find that the two strings disagree on whether you're in C:\Users\alice\src\putty or /c/Users/alice/src/putty. I think this commit should work around both of these problems. Reading the man page for `git rev-parse` more carefully, it has an option `--show-cdup`, which returns a _relative_ path from $PWD to the top-level directory of the worktree: that is, it will be a sequence of `../../..` as long as necessary, including length zero. So you can use that to directly query whether you're at the top of a git worktree: if `git rev-parse --show-cdup` returns the empty string and a success status, then you are. (If you're deeper in a worktree it will return a non-empty string, and if you're not in a worktree at all it will return a failure status and print an error message to stderr.)
2024-12-27 10:07:32 +00:00
message("Unable to determine git commit: 'git rev-parse HEAD' returned status ${status} and error output:\n${stderr}\n")
Replace mkfiles.pl with a CMake build system. This brings various concrete advantages over the previous system: - consistent support for out-of-tree builds on all platforms - more thorough support for Visual Studio IDE project files - support for Ninja-based builds, which is particularly useful on Windows where the alternative nmake has no parallel option - a really simple set of build instructions that work the same way on all the major platforms (look how much shorter README is!) - better decoupling of the project configuration from the toolchain configuration, so that my Windows cross-building doesn't need (much) special treatment in CMakeLists.txt - configure-time tests on Windows as well as Linux, so that a lot of ad-hoc #ifdefs second-guessing a particular feature's presence from the compiler version can now be replaced by tests of the feature itself Also some longer-term software-engineering advantages: - other people have actually heard of CMake, so they'll be able to produce patches to the new build setup more easily - unlike the old mkfiles.pl, CMake is not my personal problem to maintain - most importantly, mkfiles.pl was just a horrible pile of unmaintainable cruft, which even I found it painful to make changes to or to use, and desperately needed throwing in the bin. I've already thrown away all the variants of it I had in other projects of mine, and was only delaying this one so we could make the 0.75 release branch first. This change comes with a noticeable build-level restructuring. The previous Recipe worked by compiling every object file exactly once, and then making each executable by linking a precisely specified subset of the same object files. But in CMake, that's not the natural way to work - if you write the obvious command that puts the same source file into two executable targets, CMake generates a makefile that compiles it once per target. That can be an advantage, because it gives you the freedom to compile it differently in each case (e.g. with a #define telling it which program it's part of). But in a project that has many executable targets and had carefully contrived to _never_ need to build any module more than once, all it does is bloat the build time pointlessly! To avoid slowing down the build by a large factor, I've put most of the modules of the code base into a collection of static libraries organised vaguely thematically (SSH, other backends, crypto, network, ...). That means all those modules can still be compiled just once each, because once each library is built it's reused unchanged for all the executable targets. One upside of this library-based structure is that now I don't have to manually specify exactly which objects go into which programs any more - it's enough to specify which libraries are needed, and the linker will figure out the fine detail automatically. So there's less maintenance to do in CMakeLists.txt when the source code changes. But that reorganisation also adds fragility, because of the trad Unix linker semantics of walking along the library list once each, so that cyclic references between your libraries will provoke link errors. The current setup builds successfully, but I suspect it only just manages it. (In particular, I've found that MinGW is the most finicky on this score of the Windows compilers I've tried building with. So I've included a MinGW test build in the new-look Buildscr, because otherwise I think there'd be a significant risk of introducing MinGW-only build failures due to library search order, which wasn't a risk in the previous library-free build organisation.) In the longer term I hope to be able to reduce the risk of that, via gradual reorganisation (in particular, breaking up too-monolithic modules, to reduce the risk of knock-on references when you included a module for function A and it also contains function B with an unsatisfied dependency you didn't really need). Ideally I want to reach a state in which the libraries all have sensibly described purposes, a clearly documented (partial) order in which they're permitted to depend on each other, and a specification of what stubs you have to put where if you're leaving one of them out (e.g. nocrypto) and what callbacks you have to define in your non-library objects to satisfy dependencies from things low in the stack (e.g. out_of_memory()). One thing that's gone completely missing in this migration, unfortunately, is the unfinished MacOS port linked against Quartz GTK. That's because it turned out that I can't currently build it myself, on my own Mac: my previous installation of GTK had bit-rotted as a side effect of an Xcode upgrade, and I haven't yet been able to persuade jhbuild to make me a new one. So I can't even build the MacOS port with the _old_ makefiles, and hence, I have no way of checking that the new ones also work. I hope to bring that port back to life at some point, but I don't want it to block the rest of this change.
2021-04-10 14:21:11 +00:00
endif()
endif()
else()
if(commit STREQUAL "unavailable")
gitcommit.cmake: work around Windows pathname aliasing. The cmake script that determines the current git head commit, in order to bake it into the binaries for development builds from a git checkout, wasn't working reliably on Windows: sometimes it reported that the source directory didn't seem to be a git repository, when in fact it was. This occurred because gitcommit.cmake starts by trying to work out _whether_ the source directory is the top level of a git worktree at all, by the technique of running `git rev-parse --show-toplevel` (to print the top-level path of the git worktree _containing_ $PWD, if any) and comparing it with ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}. But the comparison was done as a plain string, which leads to problems if more than one string can represent the same actual directory. On Windows, this can occur for two reasons that I know of. One reason is related to Windows itself: if you map a network file server path to a local drive letter, then the same directory is accessible as a UNC path (e.g. \\hostname\share\subdir) and via the drive letter (e.g. N:\subdir). And it can happen that CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR and git's output disagree on which representation to use, causing the string comparison to return a false negative. (This can also affect filesystems in a WSL instance, accessed from native Windows via \\wsl$\instance\path, because Windows implements that as a network file share even though the network in question is purely in the imagination of that one machine.) The other reason is related more specifically to git, because some versions of Windows git are built on top of MSYS or MINGW or that kind of shim layer, and model Windows drive letters as subdirectories of a Unixlike VFS root. So you might also find that the two strings disagree on whether you're in C:\Users\alice\src\putty or /c/Users/alice/src/putty. I think this commit should work around both of these problems. Reading the man page for `git rev-parse` more carefully, it has an option `--show-cdup`, which returns a _relative_ path from $PWD to the top-level directory of the worktree: that is, it will be a sequence of `../../..` as long as necessary, including length zero. So you can use that to directly query whether you're at the top of a git worktree: if `git rev-parse --show-cdup` returns the empty string and a success status, then you are. (If you're deeper in a worktree it will return a non-empty string, and if you're not in a worktree at all it will return a failure status and print an error message to stderr.)
2024-12-27 10:07:32 +00:00
message("Unable to determine git commit: top-level source dir ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR} is not the root of a repository")
Replace mkfiles.pl with a CMake build system. This brings various concrete advantages over the previous system: - consistent support for out-of-tree builds on all platforms - more thorough support for Visual Studio IDE project files - support for Ninja-based builds, which is particularly useful on Windows where the alternative nmake has no parallel option - a really simple set of build instructions that work the same way on all the major platforms (look how much shorter README is!) - better decoupling of the project configuration from the toolchain configuration, so that my Windows cross-building doesn't need (much) special treatment in CMakeLists.txt - configure-time tests on Windows as well as Linux, so that a lot of ad-hoc #ifdefs second-guessing a particular feature's presence from the compiler version can now be replaced by tests of the feature itself Also some longer-term software-engineering advantages: - other people have actually heard of CMake, so they'll be able to produce patches to the new build setup more easily - unlike the old mkfiles.pl, CMake is not my personal problem to maintain - most importantly, mkfiles.pl was just a horrible pile of unmaintainable cruft, which even I found it painful to make changes to or to use, and desperately needed throwing in the bin. I've already thrown away all the variants of it I had in other projects of mine, and was only delaying this one so we could make the 0.75 release branch first. This change comes with a noticeable build-level restructuring. The previous Recipe worked by compiling every object file exactly once, and then making each executable by linking a precisely specified subset of the same object files. But in CMake, that's not the natural way to work - if you write the obvious command that puts the same source file into two executable targets, CMake generates a makefile that compiles it once per target. That can be an advantage, because it gives you the freedom to compile it differently in each case (e.g. with a #define telling it which program it's part of). But in a project that has many executable targets and had carefully contrived to _never_ need to build any module more than once, all it does is bloat the build time pointlessly! To avoid slowing down the build by a large factor, I've put most of the modules of the code base into a collection of static libraries organised vaguely thematically (SSH, other backends, crypto, network, ...). That means all those modules can still be compiled just once each, because once each library is built it's reused unchanged for all the executable targets. One upside of this library-based structure is that now I don't have to manually specify exactly which objects go into which programs any more - it's enough to specify which libraries are needed, and the linker will figure out the fine detail automatically. So there's less maintenance to do in CMakeLists.txt when the source code changes. But that reorganisation also adds fragility, because of the trad Unix linker semantics of walking along the library list once each, so that cyclic references between your libraries will provoke link errors. The current setup builds successfully, but I suspect it only just manages it. (In particular, I've found that MinGW is the most finicky on this score of the Windows compilers I've tried building with. So I've included a MinGW test build in the new-look Buildscr, because otherwise I think there'd be a significant risk of introducing MinGW-only build failures due to library search order, which wasn't a risk in the previous library-free build organisation.) In the longer term I hope to be able to reduce the risk of that, via gradual reorganisation (in particular, breaking up too-monolithic modules, to reduce the risk of knock-on references when you included a module for function A and it also contains function B with an unsatisfied dependency you didn't really need). Ideally I want to reach a state in which the libraries all have sensibly described purposes, a clearly documented (partial) order in which they're permitted to depend on each other, and a specification of what stubs you have to put where if you're leaving one of them out (e.g. nocrypto) and what callbacks you have to define in your non-library objects to satisfy dependencies from things low in the stack (e.g. out_of_memory()). One thing that's gone completely missing in this migration, unfortunately, is the unfinished MacOS port linked against Quartz GTK. That's because it turned out that I can't currently build it myself, on my own Mac: my previous installation of GTK had bit-rotted as a side effect of an Xcode upgrade, and I haven't yet been able to persuade jhbuild to make me a new one. So I can't even build the MacOS port with the _old_ makefiles, and hence, I have no way of checking that the new ones also work. I hope to bring that port back to life at some point, but I don't want it to block the rest of this change.
2021-04-10 14:21:11 +00:00
endif()
endif()
Prepare gitcommit.cmake to support multiple output types. I'm about to want to embed the current git commit into a Halibut source file, for which I'll need to add a second output mode to the existing script that finds it out.
2021-05-03 14:08:41 +00:00
if(OUTPUT_TYPE STREQUAL header)
file(WRITE "${OUTPUT_FILE}" "\
Replace mkfiles.pl with a CMake build system. This brings various concrete advantages over the previous system: - consistent support for out-of-tree builds on all platforms - more thorough support for Visual Studio IDE project files - support for Ninja-based builds, which is particularly useful on Windows where the alternative nmake has no parallel option - a really simple set of build instructions that work the same way on all the major platforms (look how much shorter README is!) - better decoupling of the project configuration from the toolchain configuration, so that my Windows cross-building doesn't need (much) special treatment in CMakeLists.txt - configure-time tests on Windows as well as Linux, so that a lot of ad-hoc #ifdefs second-guessing a particular feature's presence from the compiler version can now be replaced by tests of the feature itself Also some longer-term software-engineering advantages: - other people have actually heard of CMake, so they'll be able to produce patches to the new build setup more easily - unlike the old mkfiles.pl, CMake is not my personal problem to maintain - most importantly, mkfiles.pl was just a horrible pile of unmaintainable cruft, which even I found it painful to make changes to or to use, and desperately needed throwing in the bin. I've already thrown away all the variants of it I had in other projects of mine, and was only delaying this one so we could make the 0.75 release branch first. This change comes with a noticeable build-level restructuring. The previous Recipe worked by compiling every object file exactly once, and then making each executable by linking a precisely specified subset of the same object files. But in CMake, that's not the natural way to work - if you write the obvious command that puts the same source file into two executable targets, CMake generates a makefile that compiles it once per target. That can be an advantage, because it gives you the freedom to compile it differently in each case (e.g. with a #define telling it which program it's part of). But in a project that has many executable targets and had carefully contrived to _never_ need to build any module more than once, all it does is bloat the build time pointlessly! To avoid slowing down the build by a large factor, I've put most of the modules of the code base into a collection of static libraries organised vaguely thematically (SSH, other backends, crypto, network, ...). That means all those modules can still be compiled just once each, because once each library is built it's reused unchanged for all the executable targets. One upside of this library-based structure is that now I don't have to manually specify exactly which objects go into which programs any more - it's enough to specify which libraries are needed, and the linker will figure out the fine detail automatically. So there's less maintenance to do in CMakeLists.txt when the source code changes. But that reorganisation also adds fragility, because of the trad Unix linker semantics of walking along the library list once each, so that cyclic references between your libraries will provoke link errors. The current setup builds successfully, but I suspect it only just manages it. (In particular, I've found that MinGW is the most finicky on this score of the Windows compilers I've tried building with. So I've included a MinGW test build in the new-look Buildscr, because otherwise I think there'd be a significant risk of introducing MinGW-only build failures due to library search order, which wasn't a risk in the previous library-free build organisation.) In the longer term I hope to be able to reduce the risk of that, via gradual reorganisation (in particular, breaking up too-monolithic modules, to reduce the risk of knock-on references when you included a module for function A and it also contains function B with an unsatisfied dependency you didn't really need). Ideally I want to reach a state in which the libraries all have sensibly described purposes, a clearly documented (partial) order in which they're permitted to depend on each other, and a specification of what stubs you have to put where if you're leaving one of them out (e.g. nocrypto) and what callbacks you have to define in your non-library objects to satisfy dependencies from things low in the stack (e.g. out_of_memory()). One thing that's gone completely missing in this migration, unfortunately, is the unfinished MacOS port linked against Quartz GTK. That's because it turned out that I can't currently build it myself, on my own Mac: my previous installation of GTK had bit-rotted as a side effect of an Xcode upgrade, and I haven't yet been able to persuade jhbuild to make me a new one. So I can't even build the MacOS port with the _old_ makefiles, and hence, I have no way of checking that the new ones also work. I hope to bring that port back to life at some point, but I don't want it to block the rest of this change.
2021-04-10 14:21:11 +00:00
/*
Update source file names in comments and docs. Correcting a source file name in the docs just now reminded me that I've seen a lot of outdated source file names elsewhere in the code, due to all the reorganisation since we moved to cmake. Here's a giant pass of trying to make them all accurate again.
2022-01-22 15:38:53 +00:00
* cmake_commit.c - string literal giving the source git commit, if known.
Replace mkfiles.pl with a CMake build system. This brings various concrete advantages over the previous system: - consistent support for out-of-tree builds on all platforms - more thorough support for Visual Studio IDE project files - support for Ninja-based builds, which is particularly useful on Windows where the alternative nmake has no parallel option - a really simple set of build instructions that work the same way on all the major platforms (look how much shorter README is!) - better decoupling of the project configuration from the toolchain configuration, so that my Windows cross-building doesn't need (much) special treatment in CMakeLists.txt - configure-time tests on Windows as well as Linux, so that a lot of ad-hoc #ifdefs second-guessing a particular feature's presence from the compiler version can now be replaced by tests of the feature itself Also some longer-term software-engineering advantages: - other people have actually heard of CMake, so they'll be able to produce patches to the new build setup more easily - unlike the old mkfiles.pl, CMake is not my personal problem to maintain - most importantly, mkfiles.pl was just a horrible pile of unmaintainable cruft, which even I found it painful to make changes to or to use, and desperately needed throwing in the bin. I've already thrown away all the variants of it I had in other projects of mine, and was only delaying this one so we could make the 0.75 release branch first. This change comes with a noticeable build-level restructuring. The previous Recipe worked by compiling every object file exactly once, and then making each executable by linking a precisely specified subset of the same object files. But in CMake, that's not the natural way to work - if you write the obvious command that puts the same source file into two executable targets, CMake generates a makefile that compiles it once per target. That can be an advantage, because it gives you the freedom to compile it differently in each case (e.g. with a #define telling it which program it's part of). But in a project that has many executable targets and had carefully contrived to _never_ need to build any module more than once, all it does is bloat the build time pointlessly! To avoid slowing down the build by a large factor, I've put most of the modules of the code base into a collection of static libraries organised vaguely thematically (SSH, other backends, crypto, network, ...). That means all those modules can still be compiled just once each, because once each library is built it's reused unchanged for all the executable targets. One upside of this library-based structure is that now I don't have to manually specify exactly which objects go into which programs any more - it's enough to specify which libraries are needed, and the linker will figure out the fine detail automatically. So there's less maintenance to do in CMakeLists.txt when the source code changes. But that reorganisation also adds fragility, because of the trad Unix linker semantics of walking along the library list once each, so that cyclic references between your libraries will provoke link errors. The current setup builds successfully, but I suspect it only just manages it. (In particular, I've found that MinGW is the most finicky on this score of the Windows compilers I've tried building with. So I've included a MinGW test build in the new-look Buildscr, because otherwise I think there'd be a significant risk of introducing MinGW-only build failures due to library search order, which wasn't a risk in the previous library-free build organisation.) In the longer term I hope to be able to reduce the risk of that, via gradual reorganisation (in particular, breaking up too-monolithic modules, to reduce the risk of knock-on references when you included a module for function A and it also contains function B with an unsatisfied dependency you didn't really need). Ideally I want to reach a state in which the libraries all have sensibly described purposes, a clearly documented (partial) order in which they're permitted to depend on each other, and a specification of what stubs you have to put where if you're leaving one of them out (e.g. nocrypto) and what callbacks you have to define in your non-library objects to satisfy dependencies from things low in the stack (e.g. out_of_memory()). One thing that's gone completely missing in this migration, unfortunately, is the unfinished MacOS port linked against Quartz GTK. That's because it turned out that I can't currently build it myself, on my own Mac: my previous installation of GTK had bit-rotted as a side effect of an Xcode upgrade, and I haven't yet been able to persuade jhbuild to make me a new one. So I can't even build the MacOS port with the _old_ makefiles, and hence, I have no way of checking that the new ones also work. I hope to bring that port back to life at some point, but I don't want it to block the rest of this change.
2021-04-10 14:21:11 +00:00
*
* Generated by cmake/gitcommit.cmake.
*/
Add some missing #includes. My experimental build with clang-cl at -Wall did show up a few things that are safe enough to fix right now. One was this list of missing includes, which was causing a lot of -Wmissing-prototype warnings, and is a real risk because it means the declarations in headers weren't being type-checked against the actual function definitions. Happily, no actual mismatches.
2022-09-03 10:43:46 +00:00
#include \"putty.h\"
Replace mkfiles.pl with a CMake build system. This brings various concrete advantages over the previous system: - consistent support for out-of-tree builds on all platforms - more thorough support for Visual Studio IDE project files - support for Ninja-based builds, which is particularly useful on Windows where the alternative nmake has no parallel option - a really simple set of build instructions that work the same way on all the major platforms (look how much shorter README is!) - better decoupling of the project configuration from the toolchain configuration, so that my Windows cross-building doesn't need (much) special treatment in CMakeLists.txt - configure-time tests on Windows as well as Linux, so that a lot of ad-hoc #ifdefs second-guessing a particular feature's presence from the compiler version can now be replaced by tests of the feature itself Also some longer-term software-engineering advantages: - other people have actually heard of CMake, so they'll be able to produce patches to the new build setup more easily - unlike the old mkfiles.pl, CMake is not my personal problem to maintain - most importantly, mkfiles.pl was just a horrible pile of unmaintainable cruft, which even I found it painful to make changes to or to use, and desperately needed throwing in the bin. I've already thrown away all the variants of it I had in other projects of mine, and was only delaying this one so we could make the 0.75 release branch first. This change comes with a noticeable build-level restructuring. The previous Recipe worked by compiling every object file exactly once, and then making each executable by linking a precisely specified subset of the same object files. But in CMake, that's not the natural way to work - if you write the obvious command that puts the same source file into two executable targets, CMake generates a makefile that compiles it once per target. That can be an advantage, because it gives you the freedom to compile it differently in each case (e.g. with a #define telling it which program it's part of). But in a project that has many executable targets and had carefully contrived to _never_ need to build any module more than once, all it does is bloat the build time pointlessly! To avoid slowing down the build by a large factor, I've put most of the modules of the code base into a collection of static libraries organised vaguely thematically (SSH, other backends, crypto, network, ...). That means all those modules can still be compiled just once each, because once each library is built it's reused unchanged for all the executable targets. One upside of this library-based structure is that now I don't have to manually specify exactly which objects go into which programs any more - it's enough to specify which libraries are needed, and the linker will figure out the fine detail automatically. So there's less maintenance to do in CMakeLists.txt when the source code changes. But that reorganisation also adds fragility, because of the trad Unix linker semantics of walking along the library list once each, so that cyclic references between your libraries will provoke link errors. The current setup builds successfully, but I suspect it only just manages it. (In particular, I've found that MinGW is the most finicky on this score of the Windows compilers I've tried building with. So I've included a MinGW test build in the new-look Buildscr, because otherwise I think there'd be a significant risk of introducing MinGW-only build failures due to library search order, which wasn't a risk in the previous library-free build organisation.) In the longer term I hope to be able to reduce the risk of that, via gradual reorganisation (in particular, breaking up too-monolithic modules, to reduce the risk of knock-on references when you included a module for function A and it also contains function B with an unsatisfied dependency you didn't really need). Ideally I want to reach a state in which the libraries all have sensibly described purposes, a clearly documented (partial) order in which they're permitted to depend on each other, and a specification of what stubs you have to put where if you're leaving one of them out (e.g. nocrypto) and what callbacks you have to define in your non-library objects to satisfy dependencies from things low in the stack (e.g. out_of_memory()). One thing that's gone completely missing in this migration, unfortunately, is the unfinished MacOS port linked against Quartz GTK. That's because it turned out that I can't currently build it myself, on my own Mac: my previous installation of GTK had bit-rotted as a side effect of an Xcode upgrade, and I haven't yet been able to persuade jhbuild to make me a new one. So I can't even build the MacOS port with the _old_ makefiles, and hence, I have no way of checking that the new ones also work. I hope to bring that port back to life at some point, but I don't want it to block the rest of this change.
2021-04-10 14:21:11 +00:00
const char commitid[] = \"${commit}\";
")
Integrate the 'doc' subdir into the CMake system. The standalone separate doc/Makefile is gone, replaced by a CMakeLists.txt that makes 'doc' function as a subdirectory of the main CMake build system. This auto-detects Halibut, and if it's present, uses it to build the man pages and the various forms of the main manual, including the Windows CHM help file in particular. One awkward thing I had to do was to move just one config directive in blurb.but into its own file: the one that cites a relative path to the stylesheet file to put into the CHM. CMake builds often like to be out-of-tree, so there's no longer a fixed relative path between the build directory and chm.css. And Halibut has no concept of an include path to search for files cited by other files, so I can't fix that with an -I option on the Halibut command line. So I moved that single config directive into its own file, and had CMake write out a custom version of that file in the build directory citing the right path. (Perhaps in the longer term I should fix that omission in Halibut; out-of-tree friendliness seems like a useful feature. But even if I do, I still need this build to work now.)
2021-05-02 14:34:57 +00:00
elseif(OUTPUT_TYPE STREQUAL halibut)
if(commit STREQUAL "unavailable")
file(WRITE "${OUTPUT_FILE}" "\
\\versionid no version information available
")
else()
file(WRITE "${OUTPUT_FILE}" "\
\\versionid built from git commit ${commit}
")
endif()
Prepare gitcommit.cmake to support multiple output types. I'm about to want to embed the current git commit into a Halibut source file, for which I'll need to add a second output mode to the existing script that finds it out.
2021-05-03 14:08:41 +00:00
else()
message(FATAL_ERROR "Set OUTPUT_TYPE when running this script")
endif()
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink