From 11868299c1e9eb92263e7d8f97b059681b8bd54c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jacob Nevins Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:24:10 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Mention Links page in ports section, since there are now a number of third-party ports [originally from svn r3921] --- doc/faq.but | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/faq.but b/doc/faq.but index 92c7efbe..e75f9ca4 100644 --- a/doc/faq.but +++ b/doc/faq.but @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.61 2004/02/23 19:10:43 jacob Exp $ +\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.62 2004/03/04 21:24:10 jacob Exp $ \A{faq} PuTTY FAQ @@ -213,6 +213,9 @@ We do not have release-quality ports for any other systems at the present time. If anyone told you we had an EPOC port, or an iPaq port, or any other port of PuTTY, they were mistaken. We don't. +There are some third-party ports to various platforms, mentioned +on the Links page of our website. + \S{faq-unix}{Question} Is there a port to Unix? As of 0.54, there are Unix ports of most of the traditional PuTTY