1
0
mirror of https://git.tartarus.org/simon/putty.git synced 2025-01-10 01:48:00 +00:00

Remove references to "Win32" and "32-bit Windows".

They were there mainly to distinguish from 16-bit Windows, which hasn't
been a thing since before a noticeable fraction of the userbase were
born, probably. These days the obvious comparison is with 64-bit
Windows.

Also tweak some wording to reflect that official PuTTY executables are
not necessarily 32-bit any more, and add some XXX-REVIEW-BEFORE-RELEASE
in the same vein.
This commit is contained in:
Jacob Nevins 2017-02-15 23:58:25 +00:00
parent 7fd8915ce9
commit 2718165f01
3 changed files with 22 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ page</a>.</p>}
\cfg{winhelp-filename}{putty.hlp}
\cfg{info-filename}{putty.info}
PuTTY is a free (MIT-licensed) Win32 Telnet and SSH client. This
PuTTY is a free (MIT-licensed) Windows Telnet and SSH client. This
manual documents PuTTY, and its companion utilities PSCP, PSFTP,
Plink, Pageant and PuTTYgen.

View File

@ -213,16 +213,24 @@ seems to be working so far.
\S{faq-ports-general}{Question} What ports of PuTTY exist?
Currently, release versions of PuTTY tools only run on full Win32
systems and Unix. \q{\i{Win32}} includes versions of Windows from
Windows 95 onwards (as opposed to the 16-bit Windows 3.1; see
\k{faq-win31}), up to and including Windows 7; and we know of no
reason why PuTTY should not continue to work on future versions
of Windows.
Currently, release versions of PuTTY tools only run on Windows
systems and Unix.
PuTTY runs on versions of Windows from Windows 95 onwards (but not
the 16-bit Windows 3.1; see \k{faq-win31}), up to and including
Windows 10; and we know of no reason why PuTTY should not continue
to work on future versions of Windows.
\#{XXX-REVIEW-BEFORE-RELEASE: should say something about w32old for
pre-XP Windows}
The 32-bit Windows executables we provide for the \q{\i{x86}}
processor architecture should also work fine on 64-bit processors
that are backward-compatible with that architecture.
\#{XXX-REVIEW-BEFORE-RELEASE: The 64-bit executables will only
work on 64-bit versions of Windows. They will run somewhat faster
than 32-bit executables would on the same processor, but will
consume slightly more memory.}
The Windows executables we provide are for the 32-bit \q{\i{x86}}
processor architecture, but they should work fine on 64-bit
processors that are backward-compatible with that architecture.
(We used to also provide executables for Windows for the Alpha
processor, but stopped after 0.58 due to lack of interest.)
@ -1045,7 +1053,8 @@ is triggered by PuTTY 0.58. This was fixed in 0.59. The
\W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/xp-wont-run}{\q{xp-wont-run}}
entry in PuTTY's wishlist has more details.
\S{faq-system32}{Question} When I put PuTTY in
\S{faq-system32}{Question} When I put
\#{XXX-REVIEW-BEFORE-RELEASE 32-bit} PuTTY in
\cw{C:\\WINDOWS\\\i{SYSTEM32}} on my \i{64-bit Windows} system,
\i{\q{Duplicate Session}} doesn't work.
@ -1053,7 +1062,7 @@ The short answer is not to put the PuTTY executables in that location.
On 64-bit systems, \cw{C:\\WINDOWS\\SYSTEM32} is intended to contain
only 64-bit binaries; Windows' 32-bit binaries live in
\cw{C:\\WINDOWS\\SYSWOW64}. When a 32-bit program such as PuTTY runs
\cw{C:\\WINDOWS\\SYSWOW64}. When a 32-bit PuTTY executable runs
on a 64-bit system, it cannot by default see the \q{real}
\cw{C:\\WINDOWS\\SYSTEM32} at all, because the
\W{http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa384187(v=vs.85).aspx}{File

View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
\C{intro} Introduction to PuTTY
PuTTY is a free SSH, Telnet and Rlogin client for 32-bit Windows
PuTTY is a free SSH, Telnet and Rlogin client for Windows
systems.
\H{you-what} What are SSH, Telnet and Rlogin?