From aa67efd0fab280dff74dac684313f17844838e59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Tatham Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:11:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] If I'd tested under Minefield before releasing, r7168 would have been committed before the release. Therefore, stick it on the checklist for next time. [originally from svn r7169] [r7168 == b3a5cdc5fbab8884755690286211fa6b3425d9d3] --- CHECKLST.txt | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/CHECKLST.txt b/CHECKLST.txt index 6e775f9a..efca86d9 100644 --- a/CHECKLST.txt +++ b/CHECKLST.txt @@ -53,6 +53,11 @@ Before tagging a release containing the word XXX-REVIEW-BEFORE-RELEASE. (Any such comments should state clearly what needs to be done.) + - Also, do some testing of the Windows version with Minefield, and + of the Unix version with valgrind or efence or both. In + particular, any headline features for the release should get a + workout with memory checking enabled! + For a long time we got away with never checking the current version number in at all - all version numbers were passed into the build system on the compiler command line, and the _only_ place version