The Windows version of the Filename structure now contains three
versions of the pathname, in UTF-16, UTF-8 and the system code page.
Callers can use whichever is most convenient.
All uses of filenames for actually opening files now use the UTF-16
version, which means they can tolerate 'exotic' filenames, by which I
mean those including Unicode characters outside the host system's
CP_ACP default code page.
Other uses of Filename structures inside the 'windows' subdirectory do
something appropriate, e.g. when printing a filename inside a message
box or a console message, we use the UTF-8 version of the filename
with the UTF-8 version of the appropriate API.
There are three remaining pieces to full Unicode filename support:
One is that the cross-platform code has many calls to
filename_to_str(), embodying the assumption that a file name can be
reliably converted into the unspecified current character set; those
will all need changing in some way.
Another is that write_setting_filename(), in windows/storage.c, still
saves filenames to the Registry as an ordinary REG_SZ in the system
code page. So even if an exotic filename were stored in a Conf, that
Conf couldn't round-trip via the Registry and back without corrupting
that filename by coercing it back to a string that fits in CP_ACP and
therefore doesn't represent the same file. This can't be fixed without
a compatibility break in the storage format, and I don't want to make
a minimal change in that area: if we're going to break compatibility,
then we should break it good and hard (the Nanny Ogg principle), and
devise a completely fresh storage representation that fixes as many
other legacy problems as possible at the same time. So that's my plan,
not yet started.
The final point, much more obviously, is that we're still short of
methods to _construct_ any Filename structures using a Unicode input
string! It should now work to enter one in the GUI configurer (either
by manual text input or via the file selector), but it won't
round-trip through a save and load (as discussed above), and there's
still no way to specify one on the command line (the groundwork is
laid by commit 10e1ac7752 but not yet linked up).
But this is a start.
This fixes a load-time failure on versions of Windows too old to have
that function in kernel32.dll.
We use it to determine whether a file was safe to overwrite in the
context of PuTTY session logging: if it's safe, we skip the 'do you
want to overwrite or append?' dialog box.
On earlier Windows you can use FindFirstFile to get a similar effect,
so that's what we fall back to. It's not quite the same, though - if
you pass a wildcard then it will succeed when you'd rather it had
failed. But it's good enough to at least work in normal cases.
Now that the new CMake build system is encouraging us to lay out the
code like a set of libraries, it seems like a good idea to make them
look more _like_ libraries, by putting things into separate modules as
far as possible.
This fixes several previous annoyances in which you had to link
against some object in order to get a function you needed, but that
object also contained other functions you didn't need which included
link-time symbol references you didn't want to have to deal with. The
usual offender was subsidiary supporting programs including misc.c for
some innocuous function and then finding they had to deal with the
requirements of buildinfo().
This big reorganisation introduces three new subdirectories called
'utils', one at the top level and one in each platform subdir. In each
case, the directory contains basically the same files that were
previously placed in the 'utils' build-time library, except that the
ones that were extremely miscellaneous (misc.c, utils.c, uxmisc.c,
winmisc.c, winmiscs.c, winutils.c) have been split up into much
smaller pieces.
