After Pavel Kryukov pointed out that I have to put _something_ in the
'ssh_key' structure, I thought of an actually useful thing to put
there: why not make it store a pointer to the ssh_keyalg structure?
Then ssh_key becomes a classoid - or perhaps 'traitoid' is a closer
analogy - in the same style as Socket and Plug. And just like Socket
and Plug, I've also arranged a system of wrapper macros that avoid the
need to mention the 'object' whose method you're invoking twice at
each call site.
The new vtable pointer directly replaces an existing field of struct
ec_key (which was usable by several different ssh_keyalgs, so it
already had to store a pointer to the currently active one), and also
replaces the 'alg' field of the ssh2_userkey structure that wraps up a
cryptographic key with its comment field.
I've also taken the opportunity to clean things up a bit in general:
most of the methods now have new and clearer names (e.g. you'd never
know that 'newkey' made a public-only key while 'createkey' made a
public+private key pair unless you went and looked it up, but now
they're called 'new_pub' and 'new_priv' you might be in with a
chance), and I've completely removed the openssh_private_npieces field
after realising that it was duplicating information that is actually
_more_ conveniently obtained by calling the new_priv_openssh method
(formerly openssh_createkey) and throwing away the result.
spawn another command after starting Pageant. Also, if Pageant is
already running, `pageant keyfile' and `pageant -c command' will do
the Right Thing, that is, add the key to the _first_ Pageant and/or
run a command and then exit. The only time you now get the `Pageant
is already running' error is if you try to start the second copy
with no arguments.
NB the affected files in this checkin are rather wide-ranging
because I renamed the not really SSH1-specific
`ssh1_bignum_bitcount' function to just `bignum_bitcount'.
[originally from svn r1044]
error messages are currently wrong, and Pageant doesn't yet support
the new key type, and I haven't thoroughly tested that falling back
to password authentication and trying invalid keys etc all work. But
what I have here has successfully performed a public key
authentication, so it's working to at least some extent.
[originally from svn r973]
