My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my
traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a
100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and
FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings.
No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This
is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits
can have a higher proportion of signal.
GTK 3 PuTTY/pterm has always assumed that if it was compiled with
_support_ for talking to the raw X11 layer underneath GTK and GDK,
then it was entitled to expect that raw X11 layer to exist at all
times, i.e. that GDK_DISPLAY_XDISPLAY would return a meaningful X
display that it could do useful things with. So if you ran it over the
GDK Wayland backend, it would immediately segfault.
Modern GTK applications need to cope with multiple GDK backends at run
time. It's fine for GTK PuTTY to _contain_ the code to find and use
underlying X11 primitives like the display and the X window id, but it
should be prepared to find that it's running on Wayland (or something
else again!) so those functions don't return anything useful - in
which case it should degrade gracefully to the subset of functionality
that can be accessed through backend-independent GTK calls.
Accordingly, I've centralised the use of GDK_DISPLAY_XDISPLAY into a
support function get_x_display() in gtkmisc.c, which starts by
checking that there actually is one first. All previous direct uses of
GDK_*_XDISPLAY now go via that function, and check the result for NULL
afterwards. (To save faffing about calling that function too many
times, I'm also caching the display pointer in more places, and
passing it as an extra argument to various subfunctions, mostly in
gtkfont.c.)
Similarly, the get_windowid() function that retrieves the window id to
put in the environment of pterm's child process has to be prepared for
there not to be a window id.
This isn't a complete fix for all Wayland-related problems. The other
one I'm currently aware of is that the default font is "server:fixed",
which is a bad default now that it won't be available on all backends.
And I expect that further problems will show up with more testing. But
it's a start.
It's obvious to the trained eye whether GTK PuTTY was compiled against
GTK2 or GTK3, but the untrained eye would probably appreciate a little
help, and even the trained eye probably can't tell GTK 3.18 from 3.19
at a glance :-)
The About box is where it showed up most obviously that I'd hastily
bunged a GtkBox inside another GtkBox without considering their
margins: the 'action area' had twice the margin it should have had and
the rightmost button didn't align with the right edge of the rest of
the window contents.
Easily fixed by giving the inner hbox margin 0 (fixing the right align
and the excessive space around all the buttons), and using the
'spacing' property of GtkBox to ensure multiple buttons in it are
nicely separated without having to take care over that in the client
code that adds them.
gtk_misc_set_alignment was deprecated in GTK 3.14. But my replacement
code using gtk_label_set_xalign doesn't work there, because that
function wasn't introduced until GTK 3.16, so there are two minor
versions in the middle where a third strategy is needed.
When I abandoned GtkDialog for GtkWindow (in dc11417ae), I manually
added a horizontal GtkSeparator between the content and action areas.
Or rather, I tried to - but I forgot that gtk_box_pack_end works in
the opposite order, so that you have to add the bottom-most element
first and then the one you want to appear above it. So my separator
was below the action area, rather than between it and the content
area.
Several utility functions I've written over the last few weeks were in
rather random places because I didn't have a central gtkmisc.c to put
them in. Now I've got one, put them there!
They've now deprecated gtk_dialog_get_action_area, because they really
want a dialog box's action area to be filled with nothing but buttons
controlled by GTK which end the dialog with a response code. But we're
accustomed to putting all sorts of other things in our action area -
non-buttons, buttons that don't end the dialog, and sub-widgets that
do layout - and so I think it's no longer sensible to be trying to
coerce our use cases into GtkDialog.
Hence, I'm introducing a set of wrapper functions which equivocate
between a GtkDialog for GTK1 and GTK2, and a GtkWindow with a vbox in
it for GTK3, and I'll lay out the action area by hand.
(Not everything has sensible layout and margins in the new GTK3 system
yet, but I can sort that out later.)
Because the new functions are needed by gtkask.c, which doesn't link
against gtkdlg.c or include putty.h, I've put them in a new source
file and header file pair gtkmisc.[ch] which is common to gtkask and
the main GTK edifice.
