Correcting a source file name in the docs just now reminded me that
I've seen a lot of outdated source file names elsewhere in the code,
due to all the reorganisation since we moved to cmake. Here's a giant
pass of trying to make them all accurate again.
All the seat functions that request an interactive prompt of some kind
to the user - both the main seat_get_userpass_input and the various
confirmation dialogs for things like host keys - were using a simple
int return value, with the general semantics of 0 = "fail", 1 =
"proceed" (and in the case of seat_get_userpass_input, answers to the
prompts were provided), and -1 = "request in progress, wait for a
callback".
In this commit I change all those functions' return types to a new
struct called SeatPromptResult, whose primary field is an enum
replacing those simple integer values.
The main purpose is that the enum has not three but _four_ values: the
"fail" result has been split into 'user abort' and 'software abort'.
The distinction is that a user abort occurs as a result of an
interactive UI action, such as the user clicking 'cancel' in a dialog
box or hitting ^D or ^C at a terminal password prompt - and therefore,
there's no need to display an error message telling the user that the
interactive operation has failed, because the user already knows,
because they _did_ it. 'Software abort' is from any other cause, where
PuTTY is the first to know there was a problem, and has to tell the
user.
We already had this 'user abort' vs 'software abort' distinction in
other parts of the code - the SSH backend has separate termination
functions which protocol layers can call. But we assumed that any
failure from an interactive prompt request fell into the 'user abort'
category, which is not true. A couple of examples: if you configure a
host key fingerprint in your saved session via the SSH > Host keys
pane, and the server presents a host key that doesn't match it, then
verify_ssh_host_key would report that the user had aborted the
connection, and feel no need to tell the user what had gone wrong!
Similarly, if a password provided on the command line was not
accepted, then (after I fixed the semantics of that in the previous
commit) the same wrong handling would occur.
So now, those Seat prompt functions too can communicate whether the
user or the software originated a connection abort. And in the latter
case, we also provide an error message to present to the user. Result:
in those two example cases (and others), error messages should no
longer go missing.
Implementation note: to avoid the hassle of having the error message
in a SeatPromptResult being a dynamically allocated string (and hence,
every recipient of one must always check whether it's non-NULL and
free it on every exit path, plus being careful about copying the
struct around), I've instead arranged that the structure contains a
function pointer and a couple of parameters, so that the string form
of the message can be constructed on demand. That way, the only users
who need to free it are the ones who actually _asked_ for it in the
first place, which is a much smaller set.
(This is one of the rare occasions that I regret not having C++'s
extra features available in this code base - a unique_ptr or
shared_ptr to a string would have been just the thing here, and the
compiler would have done all the hard work for me of remembering where
to insert the frees!)
(TL;DR: to suppress redundant 'Press Return to begin session' prompts
in between hops of a jump-host configuration, in Plink.)
This new query method directly asks the Seat the question: is the same
stream of input used to provide responses to interactive login
prompts, and the session input provided after login concludes?
It's used to suppress the last-ditch anti-spoofing defence in Plink of
interactively asking 'Access granted. Press Return to begin session',
on the basis that any such spoofing attack works by confusing the user
about what's a legit login prompt before the session begins and what's
sent by the server after the main session begins - so if those two
things take input from different places, the user can't be confused.
This doesn't change the existing behaviour of Plink, which was already
suppressing the antispoof prompt in cases where its standard input was
redirected from something other than a terminal. But previously it was
doing it within the can_set_trust_status() seat query, and I've now
moved it out into a separate query function.
The reason why these need to be separate is for SshProxy, which needs
to give an unusual combination of answers when run inside Plink. For
can_set_trust_status(), it needs to return whatever the parent Seat
returns, so that all the login prompts for a string of proxy
connections in session will be antispoofed the same way. But you only
want that final 'Access granted' prompt to happen _once_, after all
the proxy connection setup phases are done, because up until then
you're still in the safe hands of PuTTY itself presenting an unbroken
sequence of legit login prompts (even if they come from a succession
of different servers). Hence, SshProxy unconditionally returns 'no' to
the query of whether it has a single mixed input stream, because
indeed, it never does - for purposes of session input it behaves like
an always-redirected Plink, no matter what kind of real Seat it ends
up sending its pre-session login prompts to.
Previously, checking the host key against the persistent cache managed
by the storage.h API was done as part of the seat_verify_ssh_host_key
method, i.e. separately by each Seat.
Now that check is done by verify_ssh_host_key(), which is a new
function in ssh/common.c that centralises all the parts of host key
checking that don't need an interactive prompt. It subsumes the
previous verify_ssh_manual_host_key() that checked against the Conf,
and it does the check against the storage API that each Seat was
previously doing separately. If it can't confirm or definitively
reject the host key by itself, _then_ it calls out to the Seat, once
an interactive prompt is definitely needed.
The main point of doing this is so that when SshProxy forwards a Seat
call from the proxy SSH connection to the primary Seat, it won't print
an announcement of which connection is involved unless it's actually
going to do something interactive. (Not that we're printing those
announcements _yet_ anyway, but this is a piece of groundwork that
works towards doing so.)
But while I'm at it, I've also taken the opportunity to clean things
up a bit by renaming functions sensibly. Previously we had three very
similarly named functions verify_ssh_manual_host_key(), SeatVtable's
'verify_ssh_host_key' method, and verify_host_key() in storage.h. Now
the Seat method is called 'confirm' rather than 'verify' (since its
job is now always to print an interactive prompt, so it looks more
like the other confirm_foo methods), and the storage.h function is
called check_stored_host_key(), which goes better with store_host_key
and avoids having too many functions with similar names. And the
'manual' function is subsumed into the new centralised code, so
there's now just *one* host key function with 'verify' in the name.
Several functions are reindented in this commit. Best viewed with
whitespace changes ignored.
Now that it's possible for a single invocation of PuTTY to connect to
multiple SSH servers (jump host followed by ultimate destination
host), it's rather unhelpful for host key prompts to just say "the
server". To check an unknown host key, users will need to know _which_
host it's purporting to be the key for.
Another possibility is to put a message in the terminal window
indicating which server we're currently in the SSH setup phase for.
That will certainly be what we have to end up doing for userpass
prompts that appear _in_ the terminal window. But that by itself is
still unhelpful for host key prompts in a separate dialog, because the
user would have to check both windows to get all the information they
need. Easier if the host key dialog itself tells you everything you
need to know to answer the question: is _this_ key the one you expect
for _that_ host?
The format _strings_ were previously centralised into the platform-
independent console.c, as const char arrays. Now the actual formatting
operation is centralised as well, by means of console.c providing a
function that takes all the necessary parameters and returns a
formatted piece of text for the console.
Mostly this is so that I can add extra parameters to the message with
some confidence: changing a format string in one file and two fprintf
statements in other files to match seems like the kind of situation
you wish you hadn't got into in the first place :-)
This complicates the API in one sense (more separate functions), but
in another sense, simplifies it (each function does something
simpler). When I start putting one Seat in front of another during SSH
proxying, the latter will be more important - in particular, it means
you can find out _whether_ a seat can support changing trust status
without having to actually attempt a destructive modification.
This gets rid of all those annoying 'win', 'ux' and 'gtk' prefixes
which made filenames annoying to type and to tab-complete. Also, as
with my other recent renaming sprees, I've taken the opportunity to
expand and clarify some of the names so that they're not such cryptic
abbreviations.
