Now we actually have enough of them to worry about, and especially
since some of the types we support are approved by organisations that
people might make their own decisions about whether to trust, it seems
worth having a config list for host keys the same way we have one for
kex types and ciphers.
To make room for this, I've created an SSH > Host Keys config panel,
and moved the existing host-key related configuration (manually
specified fingerprints) into there from the Kex panel.
It's too esoteric to be the first thing on the Auth panel; I've never
heard of any SSH server that supports it in the decade since I
implemented it. The only Google hits are lost souls mistakenly believing
they need it for passwordless public-key login and the like.
Patch due to Colin Watson.
Putting the passphrase in a file avoids exposing it to 'ps' which can
print out every process's command line, while at the same time not
being as platform-specific as the approach of providing an fd number
(since cmdgen.c is in principle a potential cross-platform PuTTYgen,
not just a Unix one, which is why it's not in the 'unix' directory).
Of course it introduces its own risks if someone can read the file
from your disk after you delete it; probably the best approach to
avoiding this, if possible, is to point the option at a file on an
in-memory tmpfs type file system. Or better still, use bash-style
/dev/fd options such as
puttygen --new-passphrase <(echo -n "my passphrase") [options]
Failing that, try a secure file-wipe utility, as the man page change
mentions.
(And a use case not to be overlooked, of course, is the one where you
actually want to generate an unprotected key - in which case, just
pass /dev/null as the filename.)
That option does exist, but only on master; it was not in the 0.66
release. It turned up by mistake when I updated the documentation copy
of the Plink online help while preparing the 0.66 release, because I
ran plink from the wrong branch.
The new release automation should stop that kind of mistake from
happening in future.
The reporter of vuln-pscp-sink-sscanf asked for a key to encrypt the
vulnerability report with, and having generated one, it seemed like a
good idea to make it part of the official PuTTY GPG key set and
publish it for the next person to use.
Now we have licence.pl, it seems to me to make very good sense to have
it generate the Halibut form(s) of the licence and copyright year as
well as the source-code forms.
As a result, I believe _no_ copies of the licence text or copyright
date exist any more except for the master one in LICENCE - so I can
completely remove the checklist section about all the places to update
it, because there's only one. Hooray!
(cherry picked from commit 774d37a0dc)
Conflicts:
doc/licence.but
(cherry-picker's note: the conflict was just because the deleted file
didn't have identical contents)
TOOLTYPE_NONNETWORK (i.e. pterm) already has "-log" (as does Unix
PuTTY), so there's no sense suppressing the synonym "-sessionlog".
Undocumented lacunae that remain:
plink accepts -sessionlog, but does nothing with it. Arguably it should.
puttytel accepts -sshlog/-sshrawlog (and happily logs e.g. Telnet
negotiation, as does PuTTY proper).
(cherry picked from commit a454399ec8)
Conflicts:
unix/uxplink.c
windows/winplink.c
(cherry-picker's notes: the conflict was only contextual, in the Plink
help output)
Now we have licence.pl, it seems to me to make very good sense to have
it generate the Halibut form(s) of the licence and copyright year as
well as the source-code forms.
As a result, I believe _no_ copies of the licence text or copyright
date exist any more except for the master one in LICENCE - so I can
completely remove the checklist section about all the places to update
it, because there's only one. Hooray!
TOOLTYPE_NONNETWORK (i.e. pterm) already has "-log" (as does Unix
PuTTY), so there's no sense suppressing the synonym "-sessionlog".
Undocumented lacunae that remain:
plink accepts -sessionlog, but does nothing with it. Arguably it should.
puttytel accepts -sshlog/-sshrawlog (and happily logs e.g. Telnet
negotiation, as does PuTTY proper).
This brings in the rest of the 0.66 branch, including some changes new
on master.
Conflicts:
doc/plink.but
sshrsa.c
(The conflicts were both trivial: in one, the addition of an extra
parameter to rsa2_newkey on master happened on the line next to 0.66's
addition of a check for NULL return value, and in the other, I'd got
the version number in the plink -h transcript messed up on master.)
The aim is to try to reduce the incidence of the two least helpful
classes of those reports: the ones which have just got mismatched
checksum files, and the ones which don't tell us the information that
would help.
(cherry picked from commit 8ff3b22243)
What should have been links to the old DSA keys were actually a second
copy of the links to the old RSA ones. Ahem.
(cherry picked from commit b62af0f40a)
This gives pride of place to the new set of keys we've recently
generated, and relegates the old ones to an afterthought.
(cherry picked from commit bb68baf53b)
Users have requested this from time to time, for distinguishing log
file names when there's more than one SSH server running on different
ports of the same host. Since we do take account of that possibility
in other areas (e.g. we cache host keys indexed by (host,port) rather
than just host), it doesn't seem unreasonable to do so here too.
(cherry picked from commit 0550943b51)
The validation end of XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 needs to check that two
time_t values differ by at most XDM_MAXSKEW, which it was doing by
subtracting them and passing the result to abs(). This provoked a
warning from OS X's clang, on the reasonable enough basis that the
value passed to abs was unsigned.
Fixed by using the (well defined) unsigned arithmetic wraparound: to
check that the mathematical difference of two unsigned numbers is in
the interval [-k,+k], compute their difference _plus k_ as an
unsigned, and check the result is in the interval [0,2k] by doing an
unsigned comparison against 2k.
The aim is to try to reduce the incidence of the two least helpful
classes of those reports: the ones which have just got mismatched
checksum files, and the ones which don't tell us the information that
would help.
Users have requested this from time to time, for distinguishing log
file names when there's more than one SSH server running on different
ports of the same host. Since we do take account of that possibility
in other areas (e.g. we cache host keys indexed by (host,port) rather
than just host), it doesn't seem unreasonable to do so here too.
PuTTY now uses the updated version of Diffie-Hellman group exchange,
except for a few old OpenSSH versions which Darren Tucker reports only
support the old version.
FIXME: this needs further work because the Bugs config panel has now
overflowed.
(cherry picked from commit 62a1bce7cb)
PuTTY now uses the updated version of Diffie-Hellman group exchange,
except for a few old OpenSSH versions which Darren Tucker reports only
support the old version.
FIXME: this needs further work because the Bugs config panel has now
overflowed.
It would be rare to have a host keypair in .ppk format or on a client
machine to load into PuTTYgen, and it might confuse people into thinking
they are required to do so.
I don't think anyone has ever actually called it that, colloquially
_or_ formally, and if anyone ever did (in a bug report, say) I'd
probably have to stop and think to work out what they meant. It's
universally called Plink, and should be officially so as well :-)
I've shifted away from using the SVN revision number as a monotonic
version identifier (replacing it in the Windows version resource with
a count of days since an arbitrary epoch), and I've removed all uses
of SVN keyword expansion (replacing them with version information
written out by Buildscr).
While I'm at it, I've done a major rewrite of the affected code which
centralises all the computation of the assorted version numbers and
strings into Buildscr, so that they're all more or less alongside each
other rather than scattered across multiple source files.
I've also retired the MD5-based manifest file system. A long time ago,
it seemed like a good idea to arrange that binaries of PuTTY would
automatically cease to identify themselves as a particular upstream
version number if any changes were made to the source code, so that if
someone made a local tweak and distributed the result then I wouldn't
get blamed for the results. Since then I've decided the whole idea is
more trouble than it's worth, so now distribution tarballs will have
version information baked in and people can just cope with that.
[originally from svn r10262]
This option is available from the command line as '-hostkey', and is
also configurable through the GUI. When enabled, it completely
replaces all of the automated host key management: the server's host
key will be checked against the manually configured list, and the
connection will be allowed or disconnected on that basis, and the host
key store in the registry will not be either consulted or updated.
The main aim is to provide a means of automatically running Plink,
PSCP or PSFTP deep inside Windows services where HKEY_CURRENT_USER
isn't available to have stored the right host key in. But it also
permits you to specify a list of multiple host keys, which means a
second use case for the same mechanism will probably be round-robin
DNS names that select one of several servers with different host keys.
Host keys can be specified as the standard MD5 fingerprint or as an
SSH-2 base64 blob, and are canonicalised on input. (The base64 blob is
more unwieldy, especially with Windows command-line length limits, but
provides a means of specifying the _whole_ public key in case you
don't trust MD5. I haven't bothered to provide an analogous mechanism
for SSH-1, on the basis that anyone worrying about MD5 should have
stopped using SSH-1 already!)
[originally from svn r10220]
We now expect that after the server has sent us CHANNEL_CLOSE, we
should not expect to see any replies to our outstanding channel
requests, and conversely after we have sent CHANNEL_CLOSE we avoid
sending any reply to channel requests from the server. This was the
consensus among implementors discussing the problem on ietf-ssh in
April 2014.
To cope with current OpenSSH's (and perhaps other servers we don't
know about yet) willingness to send request replies after
CHANNEL_CLOSE, I introduce a bug-compatibility flag which is detected
for every OpenSSH version up to and including the current 6.6 - but
not beyond, since https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1818
promises that 6.7 will also implement the new consensus behaviour.
[originally from svn r10200]
questionnaires in unfriendly formats like Excel, apparently in the
mistaken belief that we have some kind of incentive to answer them. I
hope I've managed to identify the key reason why they make this
mistake.
[originally from svn r10156]
The basic strategy is described at the top of the new source file
sshshare.c. In very brief: an 'upstream' PuTTY opens a Unix-domain
socket or Windows named pipe, and listens for connections from other
PuTTYs wanting to run sessions on the same server. The protocol spoken
down that socket/pipe is essentially the bare ssh-connection protocol,
using a trivial binary packet protocol with no encryption, and the
upstream has to do some fiddly transformations that I've been
referring to as 'channel-number NAT' to avoid resource clashes between
the sessions it's managing.
This is quite different from OpenSSH's approach of using the Unix-
domain socket as a means of passing file descriptors around; the main
reason for that is that fd-passing is Unix-specific but this system
has to work on Windows too. However, there are additional advantages,
such as making it easy for each downstream PuTTY to run its own
independent set of port and X11 forwardings (though the method for
making the latter work is quite painful).
Sharing is off by default, but configuration is intended to be very
easy in the normal case - just tick one box in the SSH config panel
and everything else happens automatically.
[originally from svn r10083]
