A user reports that Visual Studio 2013 and earlier have printf
implementations in their C library that don't support the 'z' modifier
to indicate that an integer argument is size_t. The 'I' modifier
apparently works in place of it.
To avoid littering ifdefs everywhere, I've invented my own inttypes.h
style macros to wrap size_t formatting directives, which are defined
to %zu and %zx normally, or %Iu and %Ix in old-VS mode. Those are in
defs.h, and they're used everywhere that a %z might otherwise get into
the Windows build.
(cherry picked from commit 82a7e8c4ac)
I've added the gcc-style attribute("printf") to a lot of printf-shaped
functions in this code base that didn't have it. To make that easier,
I moved the wrapping macro into defs.h, and also enabled it if we
detect the __clang__ macro as well as __GNU__ (hence, it will be used
when building for Windows using clang-cl).
The result is that a great many format strings in the code are now
checked by the compiler, where they were previously not. This causes
build failures, which I'll fix in the next commit.
(cherry picked from commit cbfba7a0e9)
As explained in the comment in the code, this makes it easier to map
addresses in the log files back to addresses in the code, if the
testsc image is built as a position-independent executable.
(cherry picked from commit 2804789be8)
In load_openssh_new_key, ret->keyblob is never null any more: now that
it's a strbuf instead of a bare realloc()ed string, it's at worst an
_empty_ strbuf. Secondly, as Coverity pointed out, the null pointer
check was too late to do any good in the first place - the previous
clause of the same if condition would already have dereferenced it!
In test_mac in the auxiliary testsc program, there's no actual reason
I would ever have called it with null ssh_mac pointer - it would mean
'don't test anything'! Looks as if I just copy-pasted the MAC parts of
the cipher+MAC setup code in test_cipher.
All the work I've put in in the last few months to eliminate timing
and cache side channels from PuTTY's mp_int and cipher implementations
has been on a seat-of-the-pants basis: just thinking very hard about
what kinds of language construction I think would be safe to use, and
trying not to absentmindedly leave a conditional branch or a cast to
bool somewhere vital.
Now I've got a test suite! The basic idea is that you run the same
crypto primitive multiple times, with inputs differing only in ways
that are supposed to avoid being leaked by timing or leaving evidence
in the cache; then you instrument the code so that it logs all the
control flow, memory access and a couple of other relevant things in
each of those runs, and finally, compare the logs and expect them to
be identical.
The instrumentation is done using DynamoRIO, which I found to be well
suited to this kind of work: it lets you define custom modifications
of the code in a reasonably low-effort way, and it lets you work at
both the low level of examining single instructions _and_ the higher
level of the function call ABI (so you can give things like malloc
special treatment, not to mention intercepting communications from the
program being instrumented). Build instructions are all in the comment
at the top of testsc.c.
At present, I've found this test to give a 100% pass rate using gcc
-O0 and -O3 (Ubuntu 18.10). With clang, there are a couple of
failures, which I'll fix in the next commit.
