The previous prompts were part of transcripts pasted directly from a
particular historical cmd session, but that's no reason to keep them
lying around confusingly, especially since we keep regenerating some
of those transcripts outside that historical context. Replace them all
with nice simple C:\> which shouldn't confuse anyone with extraneous
detail.
The number of people has been steadily increasing who read our source
code with an editor that thinks tab stops are 4 spaces apart, as
opposed to the traditional tty-derived 8 that the PuTTY code expects.
So I've been wondering for ages about just fixing it, and switching to
a spaces-only policy throughout the code. And I recently found out
about 'git blame -w', which should make this change not too disruptive
for the purposes of source-control archaeology; so perhaps now is the
time.
While I'm at it, I've also taken the opportunity to remove all the
trailing spaces from source lines (on the basis that git dislikes
them, and is the only thing that seems to have a strong opinion one
way or the other).
Apologies to anyone downstream of this code who has complicated patch
sets to rebase past this change. I don't intend it to be needed again.
At the point when we change over the seat's trust status to untrusted
for the last time, to finish authentication, Plink will now present a
final interactive prompt saying 'Press Return to begin session'. This
is a hint that anything after that that resembles an auth prompt
should be treated with suspicion, because _PuTTY_ thinks it's finished
authenticating.
This is of course an annoying inconvenience for interactive users, so
I've tried to reduce its impact as much as I can. It doesn't happen in
GUI PuTTY at all (because the trust sigil system is used instead); it
doesn't happen if you use plink -batch (because then the user already
knows that they _never_ expect an interactive prompt); and it doesn't
happen if Plink's standard input is being redirected from anywhere
other than the terminal / console (because then it would be pointless
for the server to try to scam passphrases out of the user anyway,
since the user isn't in a position to enter one in response to a spoof
prompt). So it should only happen to people who are using Plink in a
terminal for interactive login purposes, and that's not _really_ what
I ever intended Plink to be used for (which is why it's never had any
out-of-band control UI like OpenSSH's ~ system).
If anyone _still_ doesn't like this new prompt, it can also be turned
off using the new -no-antispoof flag, if the user is willing to
knowingly assume the risk.
If Plink's standard output and/or standard error points at a Windows
console or a Unix tty device, and if Plink was not configured to
request a remote pty (and hence to send a terminal-type string), then
we apply the new control-character stripping facility.
The idea is to be a mild defence against malicious remote processes
sending confusing escape sequences through the standard error channel
when Plink is being used as a transport for something like git: it's
OK to have actual sensible error messages come back from the server,
but when you run a git command, you didn't really intend to give the
remote server the implicit licence to write _all over_ your local
terminal display. At the same time, in that scenario, the standard
_output_ of Plink is left completely alone, on the grounds that git
will be expecting it to be 8-bit clean. (And Plink can tell that
because it's redirected away from the console.)
For interactive login sessions using Plink, this behaviour is
disabled, on the grounds that once you've sent a terminal-type string
it's assumed that you were _expecting_ the server to use it to know
what escape sequences to send to you.
So it should be transparent for all the use cases I've so far thought
of. But in case it's not, there's a family of new command-line options
like -no-sanitise-stdout and -sanitise-stderr that you can use to
forcibly override the autodetection of whether to do it.
This all applies the same way to both Unix and Windows Plink.
This commit also updates the dumps of Plink's and PSCP's help output,
adding the -proxycmd option to both and the -shareexists option to
Plink.
(Or rather, _re_-adding the latter, since it was introduced in error
by commit 07af4ed10 due to a branch management error and hastily
removed again in 29e8c24f9. This time it really does match reality.)
That option does exist, but only on master; it was not in the 0.66
release. It turned up by mistake when I updated the documentation copy
of the Plink online help while preparing the 0.66 release, because I
ran plink from the wrong branch.
The new release automation should stop that kind of mistake from
happening in future.
This brings in the rest of the 0.66 branch, including some changes new
on master.
Conflicts:
doc/plink.but
sshrsa.c
(The conflicts were both trivial: in one, the addition of an extra
parameter to rsa2_newkey on master happened on the line next to 0.66's
addition of a check for NULL return value, and in the other, I'd got
the version number in the plink -h transcript messed up on master.)
I don't think anyone has ever actually called it that, colloquially
_or_ formally, and if anyone ever did (in a bug report, say) I'd
probably have to stop and think to work out what they meant. It's
universally called Plink, and should be officially so as well :-)
I've shifted away from using the SVN revision number as a monotonic
version identifier (replacing it in the Windows version resource with
a count of days since an arbitrary epoch), and I've removed all uses
of SVN keyword expansion (replacing them with version information
written out by Buildscr).
While I'm at it, I've done a major rewrite of the affected code which
centralises all the computation of the assorted version numbers and
strings into Buildscr, so that they're all more or less alongside each
other rather than scattered across multiple source files.
I've also retired the MD5-based manifest file system. A long time ago,
it seemed like a good idea to arrange that binaries of PuTTY would
automatically cease to identify themselves as a particular upstream
version number if any changes were made to the source code, so that if
someone made a local tweak and distributed the result then I wouldn't
get blamed for the results. Since then I've decided the whole idea is
more trouble than it's worth, so now distribution tarballs will have
version information baked in and people can just cope with that.
[originally from svn r10262]
This was a bit rushed, and could doubtless be improved.
Also fix a couple of things I noted on the way, including:
- "pscp -ls" wasn't documented
- Windows XP wasn't mentioned enough
[originally from svn r5593]
