mirror of
https://git.tartarus.org/simon/putty.git
synced 2025-01-08 08:58:00 +00:00
d4e848a962
Those would have caught the two build problems in 0.82 before releasing it. Might as well put them on the list for the future.
308 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
308 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
Checklists for PuTTY administrative procedures
|
|
==============================================
|
|
|
|
Going into pre-release stabilisation
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
When we begin to work towards a release and want to enable
|
|
pre-releases on the website:
|
|
|
|
- Make a branch whose tip will be the current state of the
|
|
pre-release. Regardless of whether the branch is from main or
|
|
from a prior release branch, the name of the branch must now be in
|
|
the form 'pre-X.YZ', or else the website will fail to link to it
|
|
properly in gitweb and the build script will check out the wrong
|
|
thing.
|
|
|
|
- Edit ~/adm/puttysnap.sh on my build machine to set $prerelver correctly.
|
|
|
|
- Edit ~/adm/puttysnap.sh on the master machine to enable pre-release
|
|
builds, by changing the 'if false' to 'if true'.
|
|
|
|
- Wait for a nightly build to run, so that the first pre-release
|
|
snapshot actually exists.
|
|
|
|
- Put the website into pre-release mode, by defining prerel_version()
|
|
in components/Base.mc to return the upcoming version number. Also
|
|
add a news announcement in components/news. (Previous naming
|
|
convention has been to name it in the form 'X.YZ-pre.mi'.)
|
|
|
|
- Optionally: write an announcement email for the availability of
|
|
pre-releases, and send it out to <putty-announce@lists.tartarus.org>.
|
|
|
|
Things to do during the branch-stabilisation period:
|
|
|
|
- Go through the source (including the documentation), and the
|
|
website, and review anything tagged with a comment containing the
|
|
word XXX-REVIEW-BEFORE-RELEASE. (Any such comments should state
|
|
clearly what needs to be done.)
|
|
|
|
- Test the Unix build with Address Sanitiser. In particular, any
|
|
headline features for the release should get a workout with memory
|
|
checking enabled!
|
|
|
|
- Test the Windows build with Address Sanitiser too (as of VS 2022).
|
|
+ In the course of that, give a recent Windows pterm a try, to
|
|
make sure that still works.
|
|
|
|
- Test building and running on old platforms:
|
|
+ build on Debian stretch (containing CMake 3.7, the earliest
|
|
CMake we claim support for)
|
|
+ build with all three major versions of GTK
|
|
+ build the old-Windows binaries and test-run them on Win95 (PuTTY
|
|
proper even without WinSock2)
|
|
|
|
- Check Coverity is happy.
|
|
|
|
- Check the side-channel tester is happy.
|
|
|
|
- Check all the non-SSH network backends still basically work.
|
|
|
|
Making a release candidate build
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
|
|
- Make a directory to hold all the release paraphernalia. I usually
|
|
call it ~/src/putty/X.YZ (where X.YZ will stand throughout for the
|
|
version number).
|
|
|
|
- Inside that directory, clone the PuTTY git repository to a
|
|
subdirectory ~/src/putty/X.YZ/putty. Here you can make release-
|
|
related commits and tags tentatively, and keep them out of the way
|
|
of any 'git push' you might still be doing in other checkouts.
|
|
|
|
- Double-check that we have removed anything tagged with a comment
|
|
containing the words XXX-REMOVE-BEFORE-RELEASE or
|
|
XXX-REVIEW-BEFORE-RELEASE. ('git grep XXX-RE' should only show up
|
|
hits in this file itself.)
|
|
|
|
- Now update the version numbers and the transcripts in the docs, by
|
|
checking out the release branch in the release-specific checkout
|
|
and running
|
|
|
|
./release.pl --version=X.YZ --setver
|
|
|
|
Then check that the resulting automated git commit has updated the
|
|
version number in the following places:
|
|
|
|
* putty/LATEST.VER
|
|
* putty/doc/plink.but
|
|
* putty/doc/pscp.but
|
|
|
|
and also check that it has reset the definition of 'Epoch' in
|
|
Buildscr.
|
|
|
|
- Make the release tag, pointing at the version-update commit we just
|
|
generated.
|
|
|
|
- Make a release-candidate build from the release tag, and put the
|
|
build.out and build.log files somewhere safe. Normally I store
|
|
these inside the ~/src/putty/X.YZ directory, alongside the git
|
|
checkout at ~/src/putty/X.YZ/putty, so I'll sit in that checkout
|
|
directory and run a command like
|
|
|
|
bob -o ../build-X.YZ-rcN.out -l ../build-X.YZ-rcN.log -c X.YZ . RELEASE=X.YZ
|
|
|
|
This should generate a basically valid release directory as
|
|
`build-X.YZ-rcN.out/putty', and provide link maps and sign.sh
|
|
alongside that.
|
|
|
|
- Double-check in build-X.YZ-rcN.log that the release was built from
|
|
the right git commit.
|
|
|
|
- Make a preliminary gpg signature, but don't run the full release-
|
|
signing procedure. (We use the presence of a full set of GPG
|
|
signatures to distinguish _abandoned_ release candidates from the
|
|
one that ended up being the release.) In the 'build-X.YZ-rcN.out'
|
|
directory, run
|
|
sh sign.sh -r -p putty
|
|
which will generate a clearsigned file called
|
|
sha512sums-preliminary.gpg _outside_ the 'putty' subdirectory.
|
|
|
|
- For my own safety, make the release candidate build read-only.
|
|
chmod -R a-w build-X.YZ-rcN.{out,log}
|
|
|
|
- Now do some checking of the release binaries, and pass them to the
|
|
rest of the team to do some as well. Do at least these things:
|
|
* make sure they basically work
|
|
* check they report the right version number
|
|
* if there's any easily observable behaviour difference between
|
|
the release branch and main, arrange to observe it
|
|
* test that the Windows installer installs successfully
|
|
+ on x86 and Arm, and test that putty.exe runs in both cases
|
|
* test that the Unix source tarball unpacks and builds
|
|
+ on at least a reasonably current stable Linux distro, and
|
|
also try Debian sid
|
|
+ test-build with all of GTK 1, 2 and 3
|
|
+ test-build with -DNOT_X_WINDOWS (compile flag)
|
|
+ test-build with -DPUTTY_GSSAPI=OFF (cmake flag)
|
|
+ test-build with -DPUTTY_IPV6=OFF (cmake flag)
|
|
* test that the Windows source builds with Visual Studio (just in
|
|
case there's an unguarded clangism that would prevent it)
|
|
* quick check of the outlying network protocols (Telnet, SUPDUP
|
|
etc)
|
|
* feed the release-candidate source to Coverity and make sure it
|
|
didn't turn up any last-minute problems
|
|
* make sure we have a clean run of testsc
|
|
* do some testing on a system with a completely clean slate (no
|
|
prior saved session data)
|
|
|
|
Preparing to make the release
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
- Write a release announcement (basically a summary of the changes
|
|
since the last release). Check the draft version into the putty-aux
|
|
repository, so the whole team can help wordsmith it if they want to.
|
|
|
|
- Update the website, in a local checkout:
|
|
* Write a release file in components/releases which identifies the
|
|
new version, a section for the Changes page, and a news
|
|
announcement for the front page.
|
|
+ The one thing this can't yet contain is the release date;
|
|
that has to be put in at the last minute, when the release
|
|
goes live. Fill in 'FIXME', for the moment.
|
|
* Disable the pre-release sections of the website (if previously
|
|
enabled), by editing prerel_version() in components/Base.mc to
|
|
return undef.
|
|
|
|
- Prepare some 'what's new in this release' blurb for the Windows
|
|
Store. This should be very brief - even briefer than the website
|
|
news item.
|
|
* Keep it to a couple of sentences in a single paragraph,
|
|
templated along the lines of
|
|
X.YZ adds support for this, that and the other, and fixes bugs
|
|
including this and that.
|
|
or
|
|
X.YZ is a bug-fix release, mostly in the area of Foo, with one
|
|
important fix to Bar.
|
|
* Might as well check this into putty-aux too.
|
|
|
|
- Prepare a toot! I'm on Mastodon, so I should announce the release
|
|
there. This means writing a cut-down 500-char announcement, maybe
|
|
more like the website news item than like the email.
|
|
* Include any relevant hashtags. Refer to the software as #PuTTY;
|
|
if you mention SSH then write it as #SSH; similarly if we're
|
|
fixing a #vulnerability. That's how people will find the toot.
|
|
* Again, commit to putty-aux for team review.
|
|
|
|
- Update the wishlist, in a local checkout:
|
|
* If there are any last-minute wishlist entries (e.g. security
|
|
vulnerabilities fixed in the new release), write entries for
|
|
them.
|
|
* If any other bug fixes have been cherry-picked to the release
|
|
branch (so that the wishlist mechanism can't automatically mark
|
|
them as fixed in the new release), add appropriate Fixed-in
|
|
headers for those.
|
|
|
|
- Sign the release in full. In the `build-X.YZ-rcN.out' directory,
|
|
re-verify that the preliminary signed checksums file has a correct
|
|
signature on it and also matches the files you're about to sign for real:
|
|
|
|
gpg -d sha512sums-preliminary.gpg | (cd putty; grep -vF ' (installer version)' | grep . | sha512sum -c)
|
|
|
|
If the combined output of that pipeline reports both a good
|
|
signature (from the release key) and a successful verification of
|
|
all the sha512sums, then all is well and you can do the full
|
|
signing (not forgetting that the directory will have been readonly
|
|
during the last-minute testing period):
|
|
|
|
chmod -R u+w putty
|
|
sh sign.sh -r putty # and enter the release key passphrase
|
|
chmod -R a-w putty
|
|
|
|
- If the release is on a branch (which I expect it generally will
|
|
be), prepare a merge of that branch to main. Even if the branch
|
|
consists of nothing but cherry-picks _from_ main, this will mean
|
|
that the 'update version number' change appears on main and the
|
|
snapshots start announcing themselves as post-X.YZ. But also, if
|
|
there's anything new on the branch, this is how it gets on to main
|
|
as well.
|
|
|
|
- Log in to the MS Partner Center and make sure everything is in
|
|
order. If the UI has completely changed, make sure you can find
|
|
your way around the new one; if it wants you to read an enormous
|
|
document of revised T&Cs, get that out of the way in advance, so it
|
|
doesn't suddenly become a delay in the middle of the actual
|
|
release.
|
|
|
|
The actual release procedure
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
Once all the above preparation is done and the release has been built
|
|
locally, this is the procedure for putting it up on the web.
|
|
|
|
- Make a final adjustment to your local website changes, filling in
|
|
the release date in components/releases/X.YZ.mi.
|
|
|
|
- Upload the release itself and its link maps to everywhere it needs
|
|
to be, by running this in the build-X.YZ-rcN.out directory:
|
|
../putty/release.pl --version=X.YZ --upload
|
|
|
|
- Check that downloads via version-numbered URLs all work:
|
|
../putty/release.pl --version=X.YZ --precheck
|
|
|
|
- Switch the 'latest' links over to the new release:
|
|
* Update the HTTP redirect at the:www/putty/htaccess .
|
|
|
|
- Now verify that downloads via the 'latest' URLs are all redirected
|
|
correctly and work:
|
|
../putty/release.pl --version=X.YZ --postcheck
|
|
|
|
- Push all the git repositories:
|
|
* run 'git push' in the website checkout
|
|
* run 'git push' in the wishlist checkout
|
|
* push from the main PuTTY checkout. Typically this one will be
|
|
pushing both the release tag and the merge to the main branch,
|
|
plus removing the pre-release branch, so you'll want some
|
|
commands along these lines:
|
|
git push origin main # update the main branch
|
|
git push origin --tags # should push the new release tag
|
|
git push origin :pre-X.YZ # delete the pre-release branch
|
|
|
|
- Run ~/adm/puttyweb.sh on thyestes to update the website after all
|
|
those git pushes.
|
|
|
|
- Check that the unpublished website on thyestes looks sensible.
|
|
|
|
- Run webupdate, so that all the changes on thyestes propagate to
|
|
chiark. Important to do this _before_ announcing that the release
|
|
is available.
|
|
|
|
- After running webupdate, run update-rsync on chiark and verify that
|
|
the rsync mirror package (~/ftp/putty-website-mirror) contains a
|
|
subdirectory for the new version and that the links from its
|
|
latest.html point into that subdirectory.
|
|
|
|
- Start the process of updating our Windows Store entry:
|
|
+ log into partner.microsoft.com and go to Partner Center
|
|
+ start editing the existing app submission, which should
|
|
automatically create a new submission
|
|
* provide a new set of installer URLs, then click "save all"
|
|
which actually uploads them
|
|
+ be careful to use URLs without "latest" in the pathname!
|
|
Just copying from the links on the download page is wrong.
|
|
Change "latest" to the version number, and test-download
|
|
via those URLs to check you didn't make a typo.
|
|
* change the "what's new in this release" text in the store
|
|
listing
|
|
* upload revised screenshots, if necessary
|
|
* update the URL in the "Applicable license terms" box
|
|
+ press Publish or Submit (or whatever the button is called this
|
|
time) to submit that to the actual upload process
|
|
|
|
- Announce the release!
|
|
+ Construct a release announcement email whose message body is the
|
|
announcement written above, and which includes the following
|
|
headers:
|
|
* Reply-To: <putty@projects.tartarus.org>
|
|
* Subject: PuTTY X.YZ is released
|
|
+ Mail that release announcement to
|
|
<putty-announce@lists.tartarus.org>.
|
|
+ Post it to comp.security.ssh.
|
|
+ Post the prepared toot to Mastodon.
|
|
+ Mention it in <TDHTT> on mono.
|
|
|
|
- Edit the master ~/adm/puttysnap.sh to disable pre-release builds,
|
|
if they were previously enabled.
|
|
|
|
- Relax (slightly).
|