Before commit 6e69223dc2, Pageant would stop working after a
certain number of PuTTYs were active at the same time. (At most about
60, but maybe fewer - see below.)
This was because of two separate bugs. The easy one, fixed in
6e69223dc2 itself, was that PuTTY left each named-pipe connection
to Pageant open for the rest of its lifetime. So the real problem was
that Pageant had too many active connections at once. (And since a
given PuTTY might make multiple connections during userauth - one to
list keys, and maybe another to actually make a signature - that was
why the number of _PuTTYs_ might vary.)
It was clearly a bug that PuTTY was leaving connections to Pageant
needlessly open. But it was _also_ a bug that Pageant couldn't handle
more than about 60 at once. In this commit, I fix that secondary bug.
The cause of the bug is that the WaitForMultipleObjects function
family in the Windows API have a limit on the number of HANDLE objects
they can select between. The limit is MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS, defined to
be 64. And handle-io.c was using a separate event object for each I/O
subthread to communicate back to the main thread, so as soon as all
those event objects (plus a handful of other HANDLEs) added up to more
than 64, we'd start passing an overlarge handle array to
WaitForMultipleObjects, and it would start not doing what we wanted.
To fix this, I've reorganised handle-io.c so that all its subthreads
share just _one_ event object to signal readiness back to the main
thread. There's now a linked list of 'struct handle' objects that are
ready to be processed, protected by a CRITICAL_SECTION. Each subthread
signals readiness by adding itself to the linked list, and setting the
event object to indicate that the list is now non-empty. When the main
thread receives the event, it iterates over the whole list processing
all the ready handles.
(Each 'struct handle' still has a separate event object for the main
thread to use to communicate _to_ the subthread. That's OK, because no
thread is ever waiting on all those events at once: each subthread
only waits on its own.)
The previous HT_FOREIGN system didn't really fit into this framework.
So I've moved it out into its own system. There's now a handle-wait.c
which deals with the relatively simple job of managing a list of
handles that need to be waited for, each with a callback function;
that's what communicates a list of HANDLEs to event loops, and
receives the notification when the event loop notices that one of them
has done something. And handle-io.c is now just one client of
handle-wait.c, providing a single HANDLE to the event loop, and
dealing internally with everything that needs to be done when that
handle fires.
The new top-level handle-wait.c system *still* can't deal with more
than MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS. At the moment, I'm reasonably convinced it
doesn't need to: the only kind of HANDLE that any of our tools could
previously have needed to wait on more than one of was the one in
handle-io.c that I've just removed. But I've left some assertions and
a TODO comment in there just in case we need to change that in future.
17c57e1078