1
0
mirror of https://git.tartarus.org/simon/putty.git synced 2025-01-09 09:27:59 +00:00
putty-source/sshprime.c
Simon Tatham 628e794832 Replace random_byte() with random_read().
This is in preparation for a PRNG revamp which will want to have a
well defined boundary for any given request-for-randomness, so that it
can destroy the evidence afterwards. So no more looping round calling
random_byte() and then stopping when we feel like it: now you say up
front how many random bytes you want, and call random_read() which
gives you that many in one go.

Most of the call sites that had to be fixed are fairly mechanical, and
quite a few ended up more concise afterwards. A few became more
cumbersome, such as mp_random_bits, in which the new API doesn't let
me load the random bytes directly into the target integer without
triggering undefined behaviour, so instead I have to allocate a
separate temporary buffer.

The _most_ interesting call site was in the PKCS#1 v1.5 padding code
in sshrsa.c (used in SSH-1), in which you need a stream of _nonzero_
random bytes. The previous code just looped on random_byte, retrying
if it got a zero. Now I'm doing a much more interesting thing with an
mpint, essentially scaling a binary fraction repeatedly to extract a
number in the range [0,255) and then adding 1 to it.
2019-01-23 22:36:17 +00:00

396 lines
13 KiB
C

/*
* Prime generation.
*/
#include <assert.h>
#include "ssh.h"
#include "mpint.h"
/*
* This prime generation algorithm is pretty much cribbed from
* OpenSSL. The algorithm is:
*
* - invent a B-bit random number and ensure the top and bottom
* bits are set (so it's definitely B-bit, and it's definitely
* odd)
*
* - see if it's coprime to all primes below 2^16; increment it by
* two until it is (this shouldn't take long in general)
*
* - perform the Miller-Rabin primality test enough times to
* ensure the probability of it being composite is 2^-80 or
* less
*
* - go back to square one if any M-R test fails.
*/
/*
* The Miller-Rabin primality test is an extension to the Fermat
* test. The Fermat test just checks that a^(p-1) == 1 mod p; this
* is vulnerable to Carmichael numbers. Miller-Rabin considers how
* that 1 is derived as well.
*
* Lemma: if a^2 == 1 (mod p), and p is prime, then either a == 1
* or a == -1 (mod p).
*
* Proof: p divides a^2-1, i.e. p divides (a+1)(a-1). Hence,
* since p is prime, either p divides (a+1) or p divides (a-1).
* But this is the same as saying that either a is congruent to
* -1 mod p or a is congruent to +1 mod p. []
*
* Comment: This fails when p is not prime. Consider p=mn, so
* that mn divides (a+1)(a-1). Now we could have m dividing (a+1)
* and n dividing (a-1), without the whole of mn dividing either.
* For example, consider a=10 and p=99. 99 = 9 * 11; 9 divides
* 10-1 and 11 divides 10+1, so a^2 is congruent to 1 mod p
* without a having to be congruent to either 1 or -1.
*
* So the Miller-Rabin test, as well as considering a^(p-1),
* considers a^((p-1)/2), a^((p-1)/4), and so on as far as it can
* go. In other words. we write p-1 as q * 2^k, with k as large as
* possible (i.e. q must be odd), and we consider the powers
*
* a^(q*2^0) a^(q*2^1) ... a^(q*2^(k-1)) a^(q*2^k)
* i.e. a^((n-1)/2^k) a^((n-1)/2^(k-1)) ... a^((n-1)/2) a^(n-1)
*
* If p is to be prime, the last of these must be 1. Therefore, by
* the above lemma, the one before it must be either 1 or -1. And
* _if_ it's 1, then the one before that must be either 1 or -1,
* and so on ... In other words, we expect to see a trailing chain
* of 1s preceded by a -1. (If we're unlucky, our trailing chain of
* 1s will be as long as the list so we'll never get to see what
* lies before it. This doesn't count as a test failure because it
* hasn't _proved_ that p is not prime.)
*
* For example, consider a=2 and p=1729. 1729 is a Carmichael
* number: although it's not prime, it satisfies a^(p-1) == 1 mod p
* for any a coprime to it. So the Fermat test wouldn't have a
* problem with it at all, unless we happened to stumble on an a
* which had a common factor.
*
* So. 1729 - 1 equals 27 * 2^6. So we look at
*
* 2^27 mod 1729 == 645
* 2^108 mod 1729 == 1065
* 2^216 mod 1729 == 1
* 2^432 mod 1729 == 1
* 2^864 mod 1729 == 1
* 2^1728 mod 1729 == 1
*
* We do have a trailing string of 1s, so the Fermat test would
* have been happy. But this trailing string of 1s is preceded by
* 1065; whereas if 1729 were prime, we'd expect to see it preceded
* by -1 (i.e. 1728.). Guards! Seize this impostor.
*
* (If we were unlucky, we might have tried a=16 instead of a=2;
* now 16^27 mod 1729 == 1, so we would have seen a long string of
* 1s and wouldn't have seen the thing _before_ the 1s. So, just
* like the Fermat test, for a given p there may well exist values
* of a which fail to show up its compositeness. So we try several,
* just like the Fermat test. The difference is that Miller-Rabin
* is not _in general_ fooled by Carmichael numbers.)
*
* Put simply, then, the Miller-Rabin test requires us to:
*
* 1. write p-1 as q * 2^k, with q odd
* 2. compute z = (a^q) mod p.
* 3. report success if z == 1 or z == -1.
* 4. square z at most k-1 times, and report success if it becomes
* -1 at any point.
* 5. report failure otherwise.
*
* (We expect z to become -1 after at most k-1 squarings, because
* if it became -1 after k squarings then a^(p-1) would fail to be
* 1. And we don't need to investigate what happens after we see a
* -1, because we _know_ that -1 squared is 1 modulo anything at
* all, so after we've seen a -1 we can be sure of seeing nothing
* but 1s.)
*/
static unsigned short primes[6542]; /* # primes < 65536 */
#define NPRIMES (lenof(primes))
static void init_primes_array(void)
{
if (primes[0])
return; /* already done */
bool A[65536];
for (size_t i = 2; i < lenof(A); i++)
A[i] = true;
for (size_t i = 2; i < lenof(A); i++) {
if (!A[i])
continue;
for (size_t j = 2*i; j < lenof(A); j += i)
A[j] = false;
}
size_t pos = 0;
for (size_t i = 2; i < lenof(A); i++)
if (A[i])
primes[pos++] = i;
assert(pos == NPRIMES);
}
static unsigned short mp_mod_short(mp_int *x, unsigned short modulus)
{
/*
* This function lives here rather than in mpint.c partly because
* this is the only place it's needed, but mostly because it
* doesn't pay careful attention to constant running time, since
* as far as I can tell that's a lost cause for key generation
* anyway.
*/
unsigned accumulator = 0;
for (size_t i = mp_max_bytes(x); i-- > 0 ;) {
accumulator = 0x100 * accumulator + mp_get_byte(x, i);
accumulator %= modulus;
}
return accumulator;
}
/*
* Generate a prime. We can deal with various extra properties of
* the prime:
*
* - to speed up use in RSA, we can arrange to select a prime with
* the property (prime % modulus) != residue.
*
* - for use in DSA, we can arrange to select a prime which is one
* more than a multiple of a dirty great bignum. In this case
* `bits' gives the size of the factor by which we _multiply_
* that bignum, rather than the size of the whole number.
*
* - for the basically cosmetic purposes of generating keys of the
* length actually specified rather than off by one bit, we permit
* the caller to provide an unsigned integer 'firstbits' which will
* match the top few bits of the returned prime. (That is, there
* will exist some n such that (returnvalue >> n) == firstbits.) If
* 'firstbits' is not needed, specifying it to either 0 or 1 is
* an adequate no-op.
*/
mp_int *primegen(
int bits, int modulus, int residue, mp_int *factor,
int phase, progfn_t pfn, void *pfnparam, unsigned firstbits)
{
init_primes_array();
int progress = 0;
size_t fbsize = 0;
while (firstbits >> fbsize) /* work out how to align this */
fbsize++;
STARTOVER:
pfn(pfnparam, PROGFN_PROGRESS, phase, ++progress);
/*
* Generate a k-bit random number with top and bottom bits set.
* Alternatively, if `factor' is nonzero, generate a k-bit
* random number with the top bit set and the bottom bit clear,
* multiply it by `factor', and add one.
*/
mp_int *p = mp_random_bits(bits - 1);
mp_set_bit(p, 0, factor ? 0 : 1); /* bottom bit */
mp_set_bit(p, bits-1, 1); /* top bit */
for (size_t i = 0; i < fbsize; i++)
mp_set_bit(p, bits-fbsize + i, 1 & (firstbits >> i));
if (factor) {
mp_int *tmp = p;
p = mp_mul(tmp, factor);
mp_free(tmp);
assert(mp_get_bit(p, 0) == 0);
mp_set_bit(p, 0, 1);
}
/*
* We need to ensure this random number is coprime to the first
* few primes, by repeatedly adding either 2 or 2*factor to it
* until it is. To do this we make a list of (modulus, residue)
* pairs to avoid, and we also add to that list the extra pair our
* caller wants to avoid.
*/
/* List the moduli */
unsigned long moduli[NPRIMES + 1];
for (size_t i = 0; i < NPRIMES; i++)
moduli[i] = primes[i];
moduli[NPRIMES] = modulus;
/* Find the residue of our starting number mod each of them. Also
* set up the multipliers array which tells us how each one will
* change when we increment the number (which isn't just 1 if
* we're incrementing by multiples of factor). */
unsigned long residues[NPRIMES + 1], multipliers[NPRIMES + 1];
for (size_t i = 0; i < lenof(moduli); i++) {
residues[i] = mp_mod_short(p, moduli[i]);
if (factor)
multipliers[i] = mp_mod_short(factor, moduli[i]);
else
multipliers[i] = 1;
}
/* Adjust the last entry so that it avoids a residue other than zero */
residues[NPRIMES] = (residues[NPRIMES] + modulus - residue) % modulus;
/*
* Now loop until no residue in that list is zero, to find a
* sensible increment. We maintain the increment in an ordinary
* integer, so if it gets too big, we'll have to give up and go
* back to making up a fresh random large integer.
*/
unsigned delta = 0;
while (1) {
for (size_t i = 0; i < lenof(moduli); i++)
if (!((residues[i] + delta * multipliers[i]) % moduli[i]))
goto found_a_zero;
/* If we didn't exit that loop by goto, we've got our candidate. */
break;
found_a_zero:
delta += 2;
if (delta > 65536) {
mp_free(p);
goto STARTOVER;
}
}
/*
* Having found a plausible increment, actually add it on.
*/
if (factor) {
mp_int *d = mp_from_integer(delta);
mp_int *df = mp_mul(d, factor);
mp_add_into(p, p, df);
mp_free(d);
mp_free(df);
} else {
mp_add_integer_into(p, p, delta);
}
/*
* Now apply the Miller-Rabin primality test a few times. First
* work out how many checks are needed.
*/
unsigned checks =
bits >= 1300 ? 2 : bits >= 850 ? 3 : bits >= 650 ? 4 :
bits >= 550 ? 5 : bits >= 450 ? 6 : bits >= 400 ? 7 :
bits >= 350 ? 8 : bits >= 300 ? 9 : bits >= 250 ? 12 :
bits >= 200 ? 15 : bits >= 150 ? 18 : 27;
/*
* Next, write p-1 as q*2^k.
*/
size_t k;
for (k = 0; mp_get_bit(p, k) == !k; k++)
continue; /* find first 1 bit in p-1 */
mp_int *q = mp_rshift_safe(p, k);
/*
* Set up stuff for the Miller-Rabin checks.
*/
mp_int *two = mp_from_integer(2);
mp_int *pm1 = mp_copy(p);
mp_sub_integer_into(pm1, pm1, 1);
MontyContext *mc = monty_new(p);
mp_int *m_pm1 = monty_import(mc, pm1);
bool known_bad = false;
/*
* Now, for each check ...
*/
for (unsigned check = 0; check < checks && !known_bad; check++) {
/*
* Invent a random number between 1 and p-1.
*/
mp_int *w = mp_random_in_range(two, pm1);
monty_import_into(mc, w, w);
pfn(pfnparam, PROGFN_PROGRESS, phase, ++progress);
/*
* Compute w^q mod p.
*/
mp_int *wqp = monty_pow(mc, w, q);
mp_free(w);
/*
* See if this is 1, or if it is -1, or if it becomes -1
* when squared at most k-1 times.
*/
bool passed = false;
if (mp_cmp_eq(wqp, monty_identity(mc)) || mp_cmp_eq(wqp, m_pm1)) {
passed = true;
} else {
for (size_t i = 0; i < k - 1; i++) {
monty_mul_into(mc, wqp, wqp, wqp);
if (mp_cmp_eq(wqp, m_pm1)) {
passed = true;
break;
}
}
}
if (!passed)
known_bad = true;
mp_free(wqp);
}
mp_free(q);
mp_free(two);
mp_free(pm1);
monty_free(mc);
mp_free(m_pm1);
if (known_bad) {
mp_free(p);
goto STARTOVER;
}
/*
* We have a prime!
*/
return p;
}
/*
* Invent a pair of values suitable for use as 'firstbits' in the
* above function, such that their product is at least 2.
*
* This is used for generating both RSA and DSA keys which have
* exactly the specified number of bits rather than one fewer - if you
* generate an a-bit and a b-bit number completely at random and
* multiply them together, you could end up with either an (ab-1)-bit
* number or an (ab)-bit number. The former happens log(2)*2-1 of the
* time (about 39%) and, though actually harmless, every time it
* occurs it has a non-zero probability of sparking a user email along
* the lines of 'Hey, I asked PuTTYgen for a 2048-bit key and I only
* got 2047 bits! Bug!'
*/
void invent_firstbits(unsigned *one, unsigned *two)
{
/*
* Our criterion is that any number in the range [one,one+1)
* multiplied by any number in the range [two,two+1) should have
* the highest bit set. It should be clear that we can trivially
* test this by multiplying the smallest values in each interval,
* i.e. the ones we actually invented.
*/
do {
uint8_t bytes[2];
random_read(bytes, 2);
*one = 0x100 | bytes[0];
*two = 0x100 | bytes[1];
} while (*one * *two < 0x20000);
}