Some kinds of channel, even after they've sent EOF in both directions,
still have something to do before they initiate the CLOSE mechanism
and wind up the channel completely. For example, a session channel
with a subprocess running inside it will want to be sure to send the
"exit-status" or "exit-signal" notification, even if that happens
after bidirectional EOF of the data channels.
Previously, the SSH-2 connection layer had the standard policy that
once EOF had been both sent and received, it would start the final
close procedure. There's a method chan_want_close() by which a Channel
could vary this policy in one direction, by indicating that it wanted
the close procedure to commence after EOF was sent in only one
direction. Its parameters are a pair of booleans saying whether EOF
has been sent, and whether it's been received.
Now chan_want_close can vary the policy in the other direction as
well: if it returns FALSE even when _both_ parameters are true, the
connection layer will honour that, and not send CHANNEL_CLOSE. If it
does that, the Channel is responsible for indicating when it _does_
want close later, by calling sshfwd_initiate_close.
d3a9142dac