When a writable HANDLE is managed by the handle-io.c system, you ask
to send EOF on the handle by calling handle_write_eof. That waits
until all buffered data has been written, and then sends an EOF event
by simply closing the handle.
That is, of course, the only way to send an EOF signal on a handle at
all. And yet, it's a bug, because the handle_output system does not
take ownership of the handle you give it: the client of handle_output
retains ownership, keeps its own copy of the handle, and will expect
to close it itself.
In most cases, the extra close will harmlessly fail, and return
ERROR_INVALID_HANDLE (which the caller didn't notice anyway). But if
you're unlucky, in conditions of frantic handle opening and closing
(e.g. with a lot of separate named-pipe-style agent forwarding
connections being constantly set up and torn down), the handle value
might have been reused between the two closes, so that the second
CloseHandle closes an unrelated handle belonging to some other part of
the program.
We can't fix this by giving handle_output permanent ownership of the
handle, because it really _is_ necessary for copies of it to survive
elsewhere: in particular, for a bidirectional file such as a serial
port or named pipe, the reading side also needs a copy of the same
handle! And yet, we can't replace the handle_write_eof call in the
client with a direct CloseHandle, because that won't wait until
buffered output has been drained.
The solution is that the client still calls handle_write_eof to
register that it _wants_ an EOF sent; the handle_output system will
wait until it's ready, but then, instead of calling CloseHandle, it
will ask its _client_ to close the handle, by calling the provided
'sentdata' callback with the new 'close' flag set to true. And then
the client can not only close the handle, but do whatever else it
needs to do to record that that has been done.
dde6590040