1
0
mirror of https://git.tartarus.org/simon/putty.git synced 2025-01-10 01:48:00 +00:00
putty-source/proxy/sshproxy.c

646 lines
20 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
/*
* sshproxy.c: implement a Socket type that talks to an entire
* subsidiary SSH connection (sometimes called a 'jump host').
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include "putty.h"
#include "ssh.h"
#include "network.h"
#include "storage.h"
const bool ssh_proxy_supported = true;
typedef struct SshProxy {
char *errmsg;
Conf *conf;
LogContext *logctx;
Backend *backend;
LogPolicy *clientlp;
Seat *clientseat;
Interactor *clientitr;
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
ProxyStderrBuf psb;
Plug *plug;
bool frozen;
bufchain ssh_to_socket;
bool rcvd_eof_ssh_to_socket, sent_eof_ssh_to_socket;
bool conn_established;
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
SockAddr *addr;
int port;
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
/* Traits implemented: we're a Socket from the point of view of
* the client connection, and a Seat from the POV of the SSH
* backend we instantiate. */
Socket sock;
LogPolicy logpolicy;
Seat seat;
} SshProxy;
static Plug *sshproxy_plug(Socket *s, Plug *p)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(s, SshProxy, sock);
Plug *oldplug = sp->plug;
if (p)
sp->plug = p;
return oldplug;
}
static void sshproxy_close(Socket *s)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(s, SshProxy, sock);
sk_addr_free(sp->addr);
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
sfree(sp->errmsg);
conf_free(sp->conf);
if (sp->backend)
backend_free(sp->backend);
if (sp->logctx)
log_free(sp->logctx);
bufchain_clear(&sp->ssh_to_socket);
delete_callbacks_for_context(sp);
sfree(sp);
}
static size_t sshproxy_write(Socket *s, const void *data, size_t len)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(s, SshProxy, sock);
if (!sp->backend)
return 0;
backend_send(sp->backend, data, len);
return backend_sendbuffer(sp->backend);
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
}
static size_t sshproxy_write_oob(Socket *s, const void *data, size_t len)
{
/*
* oob data is treated as inband; nasty, but nothing really
* better we can do
*/
return sshproxy_write(s, data, len);
}
static void sshproxy_write_eof(Socket *s)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(s, SshProxy, sock);
if (!sp->backend)
return;
backend_special(sp->backend, SS_EOF, 0);
}
static void try_send_ssh_to_socket(void *ctx);
static void sshproxy_set_frozen(Socket *s, bool is_frozen)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(s, SshProxy, sock);
sp->frozen = is_frozen;
if (!sp->frozen)
queue_toplevel_callback(try_send_ssh_to_socket, sp);
}
static const char *sshproxy_socket_error(Socket *s)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(s, SshProxy, sock);
return sp->errmsg;
}
static SocketPeerInfo *sshproxy_peer_info(Socket *s)
{
return NULL;
}
static const SocketVtable SshProxy_sock_vt = {
.plug = sshproxy_plug,
.close = sshproxy_close,
.write = sshproxy_write,
.write_oob = sshproxy_write_oob,
.write_eof = sshproxy_write_eof,
.set_frozen = sshproxy_set_frozen,
.socket_error = sshproxy_socket_error,
.peer_info = sshproxy_peer_info,
};
static void sshproxy_eventlog(LogPolicy *lp, const char *event)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(lp, SshProxy, logpolicy);
log_proxy_stderr(sp->plug, &sp->psb, event, strlen(event));
log_proxy_stderr(sp->plug, &sp->psb, "\n", 1);
}
static int sshproxy_askappend(LogPolicy *lp, Filename *filename,
void (*callback)(void *ctx, int result),
void *ctx)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(lp, SshProxy, logpolicy);
/*
* If we have access to the outer LogPolicy, pass on this request
* to the end user.
*/
if (sp->clientlp)
return lp_askappend(sp->clientlp, filename, callback, ctx);
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
/*
* Otherwise, fall back to the safe noninteractive assumption.
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
*/
char *msg = dupprintf("Log file \"%s\" already exists; logging cancelled",
filename_to_str(filename));
sshproxy_eventlog(lp, msg);
sfree(msg);
return 0;
}
static void sshproxy_logging_error(LogPolicy *lp, const char *event)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(lp, SshProxy, logpolicy);
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
/*
* If we have access to the outer LogPolicy, pass on this request
* to it.
*/
if (sp->clientlp) {
lp_logging_error(sp->clientlp, event);
return;
}
/*
* Otherwise, the best we can do is to put it in the outer SSH
* connection's Event Log.
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
*/
char *msg = dupprintf("Logging error: %s", event);
sshproxy_eventlog(lp, msg);
sfree(msg);
}
static const LogPolicyVtable SshProxy_logpolicy_vt = {
.eventlog = sshproxy_eventlog,
.askappend = sshproxy_askappend,
.logging_error = sshproxy_logging_error,
.verbose = null_lp_verbose_no,
};
/*
* Function called when we encounter an error during connection setup that's
* likely to be the cause of terminating the proxy SSH connection. Putting it
* in the Event Log is useful on general principles; also putting it in
* sp->errmsg meaks that it will be passed back through plug_closing when the
* proxy SSH connection actually terminates, so that the end user will see
* what went wrong in the proxy connection.
*/
static void sshproxy_error(SshProxy *sp, const char *fmt, ...)
{
va_list ap;
va_start(ap, fmt);
char *msg = dupvprintf(fmt, ap);
va_end(ap);
if (!sp->errmsg)
sp->errmsg = dupstr(msg);
sshproxy_eventlog(&sp->logpolicy, msg);
sfree(msg);
}
static void try_send_ssh_to_socket(void *ctx)
{
SshProxy *sp = (SshProxy *)ctx;
if (sp->frozen)
return;
while (bufchain_size(&sp->ssh_to_socket)) {
ptrlen pl = bufchain_prefix(&sp->ssh_to_socket);
plug_receive(sp->plug, 0, pl.ptr, pl.len);
bufchain_consume(&sp->ssh_to_socket, pl.len);
}
if (sp->rcvd_eof_ssh_to_socket &&
!sp->sent_eof_ssh_to_socket) {
sp->sent_eof_ssh_to_socket = true;
plug_closing_normal(sp->plug);
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
}
}
static void sshproxy_notify_session_started(Seat *seat)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
if (sp->clientseat)
interactor_return_seat(sp->clientitr);
sp->conn_established = true;
plug_log(sp->plug, PLUGLOG_CONNECT_SUCCESS, sp->addr, sp->port, NULL, 0);
}
static size_t sshproxy_output(Seat *seat, SeatOutputType type,
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
const void *data, size_t len)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
bufchain_add(&sp->ssh_to_socket, data, len);
try_send_ssh_to_socket(sp);
return bufchain_size(&sp->ssh_to_socket);
}
Framework for announcing which Interactor is talking. All this Interactor business has been gradually working towards being able to inform the user _which_ network connection is currently presenting them with a password prompt (or whatever), in situations where more than one of them might be, such as an SSH connection being used as a proxy for another SSH connection when neither one has one-touch login configured. At some point, we have to arrange that any attempt to do a user interaction during connection setup - be it a password prompt, a host key confirmation dialog, or just displaying an SSH login banner - makes it clear which host it's come from. That's going to mean calling some kind of announcement function before doing any of those things. But there are several of those functions in the Seat API, and calls to them are scattered far and wide across the SSH backend. (And not even just there - the Rlogin backend also uses seat_get_userpass_input). How can we possibly make sure we don't forget a vital call site on some obscure little-tested code path, and leave the user confused in just that one case which nobody might notice for years? Today I thought of a trick to solve that problem. We can use the C type system to enforce it for us! The plan is: we invent a new struct type which contains nothing but a 'Seat *'. Then, for every Seat method which does a thing that ought to be clearly identified as relating to a particular Interactor, we adjust the API for that function to take the new struct type where it previously took a plain 'Seat *'. Or rather - doing less violence to the existing code - we only need to adjust the API of the dispatch functions inline in putty.h. How does that help? Because the way you _get_ one of these struct-wrapped Seat pointers is by calling interactor_announce() on your Interactor, which will in turn call interactor_get_seat(), and wrap the returned pointer into one of these structs. The effect is that whenever the SSH (or Rlogin) code wants to call one of those particular Seat methods, it _has_ to call interactor_announce() just beforehand, which (once I finish all of this) will make sure the user is aware of who is presenting the prompt or banner or whatever. And you can't forget to call it, because if you don't call it, then you just don't have a struct of the right type to give to the Seat method you wanted to call! (Of course, there's nothing stopping code from _deliberately_ taking a Seat * it already has and wrapping it into the new struct. In fact SshProxy has to do that, in order to forward these requests up the chain of Seats. But the point is that you can't do it _by accident_, just by forgetting to make a vital function call - when you do that, you _know_ you're doing it on purpose.) No functional change: the new interactor_announce() function exists, and the type-system trick ensures it's called in all the right places, but it doesn't actually _do_ anything yet.
2021-10-30 17:05:36 +00:00
static inline InteractionReadySeat wrap(Seat *seat)
{
/*
* When we receive interaction requests from the proxy and want to
* pass them on to our client Seat, we have to present them to the
* latter in the form of an InteractionReadySeat. This forwarding
* scenario is the one case where we _mustn't_ get an
* InteractionReadySeat by calling interactor_announce(), because
* the point is that we're _not_ the originating Interactor, we're
* just forwarding the request from the real one, which has
* already announced itself.
*
* So, just here in the code, it really is the right thing to make
* an InteractionReadySeat out of a plain Seat * without an
* announcement.
*/
Framework for announcing which Interactor is talking. All this Interactor business has been gradually working towards being able to inform the user _which_ network connection is currently presenting them with a password prompt (or whatever), in situations where more than one of them might be, such as an SSH connection being used as a proxy for another SSH connection when neither one has one-touch login configured. At some point, we have to arrange that any attempt to do a user interaction during connection setup - be it a password prompt, a host key confirmation dialog, or just displaying an SSH login banner - makes it clear which host it's come from. That's going to mean calling some kind of announcement function before doing any of those things. But there are several of those functions in the Seat API, and calls to them are scattered far and wide across the SSH backend. (And not even just there - the Rlogin backend also uses seat_get_userpass_input). How can we possibly make sure we don't forget a vital call site on some obscure little-tested code path, and leave the user confused in just that one case which nobody might notice for years? Today I thought of a trick to solve that problem. We can use the C type system to enforce it for us! The plan is: we invent a new struct type which contains nothing but a 'Seat *'. Then, for every Seat method which does a thing that ought to be clearly identified as relating to a particular Interactor, we adjust the API for that function to take the new struct type where it previously took a plain 'Seat *'. Or rather - doing less violence to the existing code - we only need to adjust the API of the dispatch functions inline in putty.h. How does that help? Because the way you _get_ one of these struct-wrapped Seat pointers is by calling interactor_announce() on your Interactor, which will in turn call interactor_get_seat(), and wrap the returned pointer into one of these structs. The effect is that whenever the SSH (or Rlogin) code wants to call one of those particular Seat methods, it _has_ to call interactor_announce() just beforehand, which (once I finish all of this) will make sure the user is aware of who is presenting the prompt or banner or whatever. And you can't forget to call it, because if you don't call it, then you just don't have a struct of the right type to give to the Seat method you wanted to call! (Of course, there's nothing stopping code from _deliberately_ taking a Seat * it already has and wrapping it into the new struct. In fact SshProxy has to do that, in order to forward these requests up the chain of Seats. But the point is that you can't do it _by accident_, just by forgetting to make a vital function call - when you do that, you _know_ you're doing it on purpose.) No functional change: the new interactor_announce() function exists, and the type-system trick ensures it's called in all the right places, but it doesn't actually _do_ anything yet.
2021-10-30 17:05:36 +00:00
InteractionReadySeat iseat;
iseat.seat = seat;
return iseat;
}
static size_t sshproxy_banner(Seat *seat, const void *data, size_t len)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
if (sp->clientseat) {
/*
* If we have access to the outer Seat, pass the SSH login
* banner on to it.
*/
Framework for announcing which Interactor is talking. All this Interactor business has been gradually working towards being able to inform the user _which_ network connection is currently presenting them with a password prompt (or whatever), in situations where more than one of them might be, such as an SSH connection being used as a proxy for another SSH connection when neither one has one-touch login configured. At some point, we have to arrange that any attempt to do a user interaction during connection setup - be it a password prompt, a host key confirmation dialog, or just displaying an SSH login banner - makes it clear which host it's come from. That's going to mean calling some kind of announcement function before doing any of those things. But there are several of those functions in the Seat API, and calls to them are scattered far and wide across the SSH backend. (And not even just there - the Rlogin backend also uses seat_get_userpass_input). How can we possibly make sure we don't forget a vital call site on some obscure little-tested code path, and leave the user confused in just that one case which nobody might notice for years? Today I thought of a trick to solve that problem. We can use the C type system to enforce it for us! The plan is: we invent a new struct type which contains nothing but a 'Seat *'. Then, for every Seat method which does a thing that ought to be clearly identified as relating to a particular Interactor, we adjust the API for that function to take the new struct type where it previously took a plain 'Seat *'. Or rather - doing less violence to the existing code - we only need to adjust the API of the dispatch functions inline in putty.h. How does that help? Because the way you _get_ one of these struct-wrapped Seat pointers is by calling interactor_announce() on your Interactor, which will in turn call interactor_get_seat(), and wrap the returned pointer into one of these structs. The effect is that whenever the SSH (or Rlogin) code wants to call one of those particular Seat methods, it _has_ to call interactor_announce() just beforehand, which (once I finish all of this) will make sure the user is aware of who is presenting the prompt or banner or whatever. And you can't forget to call it, because if you don't call it, then you just don't have a struct of the right type to give to the Seat method you wanted to call! (Of course, there's nothing stopping code from _deliberately_ taking a Seat * it already has and wrapping it into the new struct. In fact SshProxy has to do that, in order to forward these requests up the chain of Seats. But the point is that you can't do it _by accident_, just by forgetting to make a vital function call - when you do that, you _know_ you're doing it on purpose.) No functional change: the new interactor_announce() function exists, and the type-system trick ensures it's called in all the right places, but it doesn't actually _do_ anything yet.
2021-10-30 17:05:36 +00:00
return seat_banner(wrap(sp->clientseat), data, len);
} else {
return 0;
}
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
}
static bool sshproxy_eof(Seat *seat)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
sp->rcvd_eof_ssh_to_socket = true;
try_send_ssh_to_socket(sp);
return false;
}
New Seat callback, seat_sent(). This is used to notify the Seat that some data has been cleared from the backend's outgoing data buffer. In other words, it notifies the Seat that it might be worth calling backend_sendbuffer() again. We've never needed this before, because until now, Seats have always been the 'main program' part of the application, meaning they were also in control of the event loop. So they've been able to call backend_sendbuffer() proactively, every time they go round the event loop, instead of having to wait for a callback. But now, the SSH proxy is the first example of a Seat without privileged access to the event loop, so it has no way to find out that the backend's sendbuffer has got smaller. And without that, it can't pass that notification on to plug_sent, to unblock in turn whatever the proxied connection might have been waiting to send. In fact, before this commit, sshproxy.c never called plug_sent at all. As a result, large data uploads over an SSH jump host would hang forever as soon as the outgoing buffer filled up for the first time: the main backend (to which sshproxy.c was acting as a Socket) would carefully stop filling up the buffer, and then never receive the call to plug_sent that would cause it to start again. The new callback is ignored everywhere except in sshproxy.c. It might be a good idea to remove backend_sendbuffer() entirely and convert all previous uses of it into non-empty implementations of this callback, so that we've only got one system; but for the moment, I haven't done that.
2021-06-27 12:52:48 +00:00
static void sshproxy_sent(Seat *seat, size_t new_bufsize)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
plug_sent(sp->plug, new_bufsize);
}
static void sshproxy_send_close(SshProxy *sp)
{
if (sp->clientseat)
interactor_return_seat(sp->clientitr);
if (!sp->conn_established)
plug_log(sp->plug, PLUGLOG_CONNECT_FAILED, sp->addr, sp->port,
sp->errmsg, 0);
if (sp->errmsg)
plug_closing_error(sp->plug, sp->errmsg);
else if (!sp->conn_established && backend_exitcode(sp->backend) == 0)
plug_closing_user_abort(sp->plug);
else
plug_closing_normal(sp->plug);
}
static void sshproxy_notify_remote_disconnect_callback(void *vctx)
{
SshProxy *sp = (SshProxy *)vctx;
/* notify_remote_disconnect can be called redundantly, so first
* check if the backend really has become disconnected */
if (backend_connected(sp->backend))
return;
sshproxy_send_close(sp);
}
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
static void sshproxy_notify_remote_disconnect(Seat *seat)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
queue_toplevel_callback(sshproxy_notify_remote_disconnect_callback, sp);
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
}
Complete rework of terminal userpass input system. The system for handling seat_get_userpass_input has always been structured differently between GUI PuTTY and CLI tools like Plink. In the CLI tools, password input is read directly from the OS terminal/console device by console_get_userpass_input; this means that you need to ensure the same terminal input data _hasn't_ already been consumed by the main event loop and sent on to the backend. This is achieved by the backend_sendok() method, which tells the event loop when the backend has finished issuing password prompts, and hence, when it's safe to start passing standard input to backend_send(). But in the GUI tools, input generated by the terminal window has always been sent straight to backend_send(), regardless of whether backend_sendok() says it wants it. So the terminal-based implementation of username and password prompts has to work by consuming input data that had _already_ been passed to the backend - hence, any backend that needs to do that must keep its input on a bufchain, and pass that bufchain to seat_get_userpass_input. It's awkward that these two totally different systems coexist in the first place. And now that SSH proxying needs to present interactive prompts of its own, it's clear which one should win: the CLI style is the Right Thing. So this change reworks the GUI side of the mechanism to be more similar: terminal data now goes into a queue in the Ldisc, and is not sent on to the backend until the backend says it's ready for it via backend_sendok(). So terminal-based userpass prompts can now consume data directly from that queue during the connection setup stage. As a result, the 'bufchain *' parameter has vanished from all the userpass_input functions (both the official implementations of the Seat trait method, and term_get_userpass_input() to which some of those implementations delegate). The only function that actually used that bufchain, namely term_get_userpass_input(), now instead reads from the ldisc's input queue via a couple of new Ldisc functions. (Not _trivial_ functions, since input buffered by Ldisc can be a mixture of raw bytes and session specials like SS_EOL! The input queue inside Ldisc is a bufchain containing a fiddly binary encoding that can represent an arbitrary interleaving of those things.) This greatly simplifies the calls to seat_get_userpass_input in backends, which now don't have to mess about with passing their own user_input bufchain around, or toggling their want_user_input flag back and forth to request data to put on to that bufchain. But the flip side is that now there has to be some _other_ method for notifying the terminal when there's more input to be consumed during an interactive prompt, and for notifying the backend when prompt input has finished so that it can proceed to the next stage of the protocol. This is done by a pair of extra callbacks: when more data is put on to Ldisc's input queue, it triggers a call to term_get_userpass_input, and when term_get_userpass_input finishes, it calls a callback function provided in the prompts_t. Therefore, any use of a prompts_t which *might* be asynchronous must fill in the latter callback when setting up the prompts_t. In SSH, the callback is centralised into a common PPL helper function, which reinvokes the same PPL's process_queue coroutine; in rlogin we have to set it up ourselves. I'm sorry for this large and sprawling patch: I tried fairly hard to break it up into individually comprehensible sub-patches, but I just couldn't tease out any part of it that would stand sensibly alone.
2021-09-14 10:57:21 +00:00
static int sshproxy_get_userpass_input(Seat *seat, prompts_t *p)
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
if (sp->clientseat) {
/*
* If we have access to the outer Seat, pass this prompt
* request on to it.
*/
Framework for announcing which Interactor is talking. All this Interactor business has been gradually working towards being able to inform the user _which_ network connection is currently presenting them with a password prompt (or whatever), in situations where more than one of them might be, such as an SSH connection being used as a proxy for another SSH connection when neither one has one-touch login configured. At some point, we have to arrange that any attempt to do a user interaction during connection setup - be it a password prompt, a host key confirmation dialog, or just displaying an SSH login banner - makes it clear which host it's come from. That's going to mean calling some kind of announcement function before doing any of those things. But there are several of those functions in the Seat API, and calls to them are scattered far and wide across the SSH backend. (And not even just there - the Rlogin backend also uses seat_get_userpass_input). How can we possibly make sure we don't forget a vital call site on some obscure little-tested code path, and leave the user confused in just that one case which nobody might notice for years? Today I thought of a trick to solve that problem. We can use the C type system to enforce it for us! The plan is: we invent a new struct type which contains nothing but a 'Seat *'. Then, for every Seat method which does a thing that ought to be clearly identified as relating to a particular Interactor, we adjust the API for that function to take the new struct type where it previously took a plain 'Seat *'. Or rather - doing less violence to the existing code - we only need to adjust the API of the dispatch functions inline in putty.h. How does that help? Because the way you _get_ one of these struct-wrapped Seat pointers is by calling interactor_announce() on your Interactor, which will in turn call interactor_get_seat(), and wrap the returned pointer into one of these structs. The effect is that whenever the SSH (or Rlogin) code wants to call one of those particular Seat methods, it _has_ to call interactor_announce() just beforehand, which (once I finish all of this) will make sure the user is aware of who is presenting the prompt or banner or whatever. And you can't forget to call it, because if you don't call it, then you just don't have a struct of the right type to give to the Seat method you wanted to call! (Of course, there's nothing stopping code from _deliberately_ taking a Seat * it already has and wrapping it into the new struct. In fact SshProxy has to do that, in order to forward these requests up the chain of Seats. But the point is that you can't do it _by accident_, just by forgetting to make a vital function call - when you do that, you _know_ you're doing it on purpose.) No functional change: the new interactor_announce() function exists, and the type-system trick ensures it's called in all the right places, but it doesn't actually _do_ anything yet.
2021-10-30 17:05:36 +00:00
return seat_get_userpass_input(wrap(sp->clientseat), p);
}
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
/*
* Otherwise, behave as if noninteractive (like plink -batch):
* reject all attempts to present a prompt to the user, and log in
* the Event Log to say why not.
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
*/
sshproxy_error(sp, "Unable to provide interactive authentication "
"requested by proxy SSH connection");
return 0;
}
static void sshproxy_connection_fatal_callback(void *vctx)
{
SshProxy *sp = (SshProxy *)vctx;
sshproxy_send_close(sp);
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
}
static void sshproxy_connection_fatal(Seat *seat, const char *message)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
if (!sp->errmsg) {
sp->errmsg = dupprintf(
"fatal error in proxy SSH connection: %s", message);
queue_toplevel_callback(sshproxy_connection_fatal_callback, sp);
}
}
Reorganise host key checking and confirmation. Previously, checking the host key against the persistent cache managed by the storage.h API was done as part of the seat_verify_ssh_host_key method, i.e. separately by each Seat. Now that check is done by verify_ssh_host_key(), which is a new function in ssh/common.c that centralises all the parts of host key checking that don't need an interactive prompt. It subsumes the previous verify_ssh_manual_host_key() that checked against the Conf, and it does the check against the storage API that each Seat was previously doing separately. If it can't confirm or definitively reject the host key by itself, _then_ it calls out to the Seat, once an interactive prompt is definitely needed. The main point of doing this is so that when SshProxy forwards a Seat call from the proxy SSH connection to the primary Seat, it won't print an announcement of which connection is involved unless it's actually going to do something interactive. (Not that we're printing those announcements _yet_ anyway, but this is a piece of groundwork that works towards doing so.) But while I'm at it, I've also taken the opportunity to clean things up a bit by renaming functions sensibly. Previously we had three very similarly named functions verify_ssh_manual_host_key(), SeatVtable's 'verify_ssh_host_key' method, and verify_host_key() in storage.h. Now the Seat method is called 'confirm' rather than 'verify' (since its job is now always to print an interactive prompt, so it looks more like the other confirm_foo methods), and the storage.h function is called check_stored_host_key(), which goes better with store_host_key and avoids having too many functions with similar names. And the 'manual' function is subsumed into the new centralised code, so there's now just *one* host key function with 'verify' in the name. Several functions are reindented in this commit. Best viewed with whitespace changes ignored.
2021-10-25 17:12:17 +00:00
static int sshproxy_confirm_ssh_host_key(
Seat *seat, const char *host, int port, const char *keytype,
char *keystr, const char *keydisp, char **key_fingerprints, bool mismatch,
void (*callback)(void *ctx, int result), void *ctx)
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
if (sp->clientseat) {
/*
* If we have access to the outer Seat, pass this prompt
* request on to it.
*/
Reorganise host key checking and confirmation. Previously, checking the host key against the persistent cache managed by the storage.h API was done as part of the seat_verify_ssh_host_key method, i.e. separately by each Seat. Now that check is done by verify_ssh_host_key(), which is a new function in ssh/common.c that centralises all the parts of host key checking that don't need an interactive prompt. It subsumes the previous verify_ssh_manual_host_key() that checked against the Conf, and it does the check against the storage API that each Seat was previously doing separately. If it can't confirm or definitively reject the host key by itself, _then_ it calls out to the Seat, once an interactive prompt is definitely needed. The main point of doing this is so that when SshProxy forwards a Seat call from the proxy SSH connection to the primary Seat, it won't print an announcement of which connection is involved unless it's actually going to do something interactive. (Not that we're printing those announcements _yet_ anyway, but this is a piece of groundwork that works towards doing so.) But while I'm at it, I've also taken the opportunity to clean things up a bit by renaming functions sensibly. Previously we had three very similarly named functions verify_ssh_manual_host_key(), SeatVtable's 'verify_ssh_host_key' method, and verify_host_key() in storage.h. Now the Seat method is called 'confirm' rather than 'verify' (since its job is now always to print an interactive prompt, so it looks more like the other confirm_foo methods), and the storage.h function is called check_stored_host_key(), which goes better with store_host_key and avoids having too many functions with similar names. And the 'manual' function is subsumed into the new centralised code, so there's now just *one* host key function with 'verify' in the name. Several functions are reindented in this commit. Best viewed with whitespace changes ignored.
2021-10-25 17:12:17 +00:00
return seat_confirm_ssh_host_key(
Framework for announcing which Interactor is talking. All this Interactor business has been gradually working towards being able to inform the user _which_ network connection is currently presenting them with a password prompt (or whatever), in situations where more than one of them might be, such as an SSH connection being used as a proxy for another SSH connection when neither one has one-touch login configured. At some point, we have to arrange that any attempt to do a user interaction during connection setup - be it a password prompt, a host key confirmation dialog, or just displaying an SSH login banner - makes it clear which host it's come from. That's going to mean calling some kind of announcement function before doing any of those things. But there are several of those functions in the Seat API, and calls to them are scattered far and wide across the SSH backend. (And not even just there - the Rlogin backend also uses seat_get_userpass_input). How can we possibly make sure we don't forget a vital call site on some obscure little-tested code path, and leave the user confused in just that one case which nobody might notice for years? Today I thought of a trick to solve that problem. We can use the C type system to enforce it for us! The plan is: we invent a new struct type which contains nothing but a 'Seat *'. Then, for every Seat method which does a thing that ought to be clearly identified as relating to a particular Interactor, we adjust the API for that function to take the new struct type where it previously took a plain 'Seat *'. Or rather - doing less violence to the existing code - we only need to adjust the API of the dispatch functions inline in putty.h. How does that help? Because the way you _get_ one of these struct-wrapped Seat pointers is by calling interactor_announce() on your Interactor, which will in turn call interactor_get_seat(), and wrap the returned pointer into one of these structs. The effect is that whenever the SSH (or Rlogin) code wants to call one of those particular Seat methods, it _has_ to call interactor_announce() just beforehand, which (once I finish all of this) will make sure the user is aware of who is presenting the prompt or banner or whatever. And you can't forget to call it, because if you don't call it, then you just don't have a struct of the right type to give to the Seat method you wanted to call! (Of course, there's nothing stopping code from _deliberately_ taking a Seat * it already has and wrapping it into the new struct. In fact SshProxy has to do that, in order to forward these requests up the chain of Seats. But the point is that you can't do it _by accident_, just by forgetting to make a vital function call - when you do that, you _know_ you're doing it on purpose.) No functional change: the new interactor_announce() function exists, and the type-system trick ensures it's called in all the right places, but it doesn't actually _do_ anything yet.
2021-10-30 17:05:36 +00:00
wrap(sp->clientseat), host, port, keytype, keystr, keydisp,
Reorganise host key checking and confirmation. Previously, checking the host key against the persistent cache managed by the storage.h API was done as part of the seat_verify_ssh_host_key method, i.e. separately by each Seat. Now that check is done by verify_ssh_host_key(), which is a new function in ssh/common.c that centralises all the parts of host key checking that don't need an interactive prompt. It subsumes the previous verify_ssh_manual_host_key() that checked against the Conf, and it does the check against the storage API that each Seat was previously doing separately. If it can't confirm or definitively reject the host key by itself, _then_ it calls out to the Seat, once an interactive prompt is definitely needed. The main point of doing this is so that when SshProxy forwards a Seat call from the proxy SSH connection to the primary Seat, it won't print an announcement of which connection is involved unless it's actually going to do something interactive. (Not that we're printing those announcements _yet_ anyway, but this is a piece of groundwork that works towards doing so.) But while I'm at it, I've also taken the opportunity to clean things up a bit by renaming functions sensibly. Previously we had three very similarly named functions verify_ssh_manual_host_key(), SeatVtable's 'verify_ssh_host_key' method, and verify_host_key() in storage.h. Now the Seat method is called 'confirm' rather than 'verify' (since its job is now always to print an interactive prompt, so it looks more like the other confirm_foo methods), and the storage.h function is called check_stored_host_key(), which goes better with store_host_key and avoids having too many functions with similar names. And the 'manual' function is subsumed into the new centralised code, so there's now just *one* host key function with 'verify' in the name. Several functions are reindented in this commit. Best viewed with whitespace changes ignored.
2021-10-25 17:12:17 +00:00
key_fingerprints, mismatch, callback, ctx);
}
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
/*
Reorganise host key checking and confirmation. Previously, checking the host key against the persistent cache managed by the storage.h API was done as part of the seat_verify_ssh_host_key method, i.e. separately by each Seat. Now that check is done by verify_ssh_host_key(), which is a new function in ssh/common.c that centralises all the parts of host key checking that don't need an interactive prompt. It subsumes the previous verify_ssh_manual_host_key() that checked against the Conf, and it does the check against the storage API that each Seat was previously doing separately. If it can't confirm or definitively reject the host key by itself, _then_ it calls out to the Seat, once an interactive prompt is definitely needed. The main point of doing this is so that when SshProxy forwards a Seat call from the proxy SSH connection to the primary Seat, it won't print an announcement of which connection is involved unless it's actually going to do something interactive. (Not that we're printing those announcements _yet_ anyway, but this is a piece of groundwork that works towards doing so.) But while I'm at it, I've also taken the opportunity to clean things up a bit by renaming functions sensibly. Previously we had three very similarly named functions verify_ssh_manual_host_key(), SeatVtable's 'verify_ssh_host_key' method, and verify_host_key() in storage.h. Now the Seat method is called 'confirm' rather than 'verify' (since its job is now always to print an interactive prompt, so it looks more like the other confirm_foo methods), and the storage.h function is called check_stored_host_key(), which goes better with store_host_key and avoids having too many functions with similar names. And the 'manual' function is subsumed into the new centralised code, so there's now just *one* host key function with 'verify' in the name. Several functions are reindented in this commit. Best viewed with whitespace changes ignored.
2021-10-25 17:12:17 +00:00
* Otherwise, behave as if we're in batch mode, i.e. take the safe
* option in the absence of interactive confirmation, i.e. abort
* the connection.
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
*/
Reorganise host key checking and confirmation. Previously, checking the host key against the persistent cache managed by the storage.h API was done as part of the seat_verify_ssh_host_key method, i.e. separately by each Seat. Now that check is done by verify_ssh_host_key(), which is a new function in ssh/common.c that centralises all the parts of host key checking that don't need an interactive prompt. It subsumes the previous verify_ssh_manual_host_key() that checked against the Conf, and it does the check against the storage API that each Seat was previously doing separately. If it can't confirm or definitively reject the host key by itself, _then_ it calls out to the Seat, once an interactive prompt is definitely needed. The main point of doing this is so that when SshProxy forwards a Seat call from the proxy SSH connection to the primary Seat, it won't print an announcement of which connection is involved unless it's actually going to do something interactive. (Not that we're printing those announcements _yet_ anyway, but this is a piece of groundwork that works towards doing so.) But while I'm at it, I've also taken the opportunity to clean things up a bit by renaming functions sensibly. Previously we had three very similarly named functions verify_ssh_manual_host_key(), SeatVtable's 'verify_ssh_host_key' method, and verify_host_key() in storage.h. Now the Seat method is called 'confirm' rather than 'verify' (since its job is now always to print an interactive prompt, so it looks more like the other confirm_foo methods), and the storage.h function is called check_stored_host_key(), which goes better with store_host_key and avoids having too many functions with similar names. And the 'manual' function is subsumed into the new centralised code, so there's now just *one* host key function with 'verify' in the name. Several functions are reindented in this commit. Best viewed with whitespace changes ignored.
2021-10-25 17:12:17 +00:00
return 0;
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
}
static int sshproxy_confirm_weak_crypto_primitive(
Seat *seat, const char *algtype, const char *algname,
void (*callback)(void *ctx, int result), void *ctx)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
if (sp->clientseat) {
/*
* If we have access to the outer Seat, pass this prompt
* request on to it.
*/
return seat_confirm_weak_crypto_primitive(
Framework for announcing which Interactor is talking. All this Interactor business has been gradually working towards being able to inform the user _which_ network connection is currently presenting them with a password prompt (or whatever), in situations where more than one of them might be, such as an SSH connection being used as a proxy for another SSH connection when neither one has one-touch login configured. At some point, we have to arrange that any attempt to do a user interaction during connection setup - be it a password prompt, a host key confirmation dialog, or just displaying an SSH login banner - makes it clear which host it's come from. That's going to mean calling some kind of announcement function before doing any of those things. But there are several of those functions in the Seat API, and calls to them are scattered far and wide across the SSH backend. (And not even just there - the Rlogin backend also uses seat_get_userpass_input). How can we possibly make sure we don't forget a vital call site on some obscure little-tested code path, and leave the user confused in just that one case which nobody might notice for years? Today I thought of a trick to solve that problem. We can use the C type system to enforce it for us! The plan is: we invent a new struct type which contains nothing but a 'Seat *'. Then, for every Seat method which does a thing that ought to be clearly identified as relating to a particular Interactor, we adjust the API for that function to take the new struct type where it previously took a plain 'Seat *'. Or rather - doing less violence to the existing code - we only need to adjust the API of the dispatch functions inline in putty.h. How does that help? Because the way you _get_ one of these struct-wrapped Seat pointers is by calling interactor_announce() on your Interactor, which will in turn call interactor_get_seat(), and wrap the returned pointer into one of these structs. The effect is that whenever the SSH (or Rlogin) code wants to call one of those particular Seat methods, it _has_ to call interactor_announce() just beforehand, which (once I finish all of this) will make sure the user is aware of who is presenting the prompt or banner or whatever. And you can't forget to call it, because if you don't call it, then you just don't have a struct of the right type to give to the Seat method you wanted to call! (Of course, there's nothing stopping code from _deliberately_ taking a Seat * it already has and wrapping it into the new struct. In fact SshProxy has to do that, in order to forward these requests up the chain of Seats. But the point is that you can't do it _by accident_, just by forgetting to make a vital function call - when you do that, you _know_ you're doing it on purpose.) No functional change: the new interactor_announce() function exists, and the type-system trick ensures it's called in all the right places, but it doesn't actually _do_ anything yet.
2021-10-30 17:05:36 +00:00
wrap(sp->clientseat), algtype, algname, callback, ctx);
}
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
/*
* Otherwise, behave as if we're in batch mode: take the safest
* option.
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
*/
sshproxy_error(sp, "First %s supported by server is %s, below warning "
"threshold. Abandoning proxy SSH connection.",
algtype, algname);
return 0;
}
static int sshproxy_confirm_weak_cached_hostkey(
Seat *seat, const char *algname, const char *betteralgs,
void (*callback)(void *ctx, int result), void *ctx)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
if (sp->clientseat) {
/*
* If we have access to the outer Seat, pass this prompt
* request on to it.
*/
return seat_confirm_weak_cached_hostkey(
Framework for announcing which Interactor is talking. All this Interactor business has been gradually working towards being able to inform the user _which_ network connection is currently presenting them with a password prompt (or whatever), in situations where more than one of them might be, such as an SSH connection being used as a proxy for another SSH connection when neither one has one-touch login configured. At some point, we have to arrange that any attempt to do a user interaction during connection setup - be it a password prompt, a host key confirmation dialog, or just displaying an SSH login banner - makes it clear which host it's come from. That's going to mean calling some kind of announcement function before doing any of those things. But there are several of those functions in the Seat API, and calls to them are scattered far and wide across the SSH backend. (And not even just there - the Rlogin backend also uses seat_get_userpass_input). How can we possibly make sure we don't forget a vital call site on some obscure little-tested code path, and leave the user confused in just that one case which nobody might notice for years? Today I thought of a trick to solve that problem. We can use the C type system to enforce it for us! The plan is: we invent a new struct type which contains nothing but a 'Seat *'. Then, for every Seat method which does a thing that ought to be clearly identified as relating to a particular Interactor, we adjust the API for that function to take the new struct type where it previously took a plain 'Seat *'. Or rather - doing less violence to the existing code - we only need to adjust the API of the dispatch functions inline in putty.h. How does that help? Because the way you _get_ one of these struct-wrapped Seat pointers is by calling interactor_announce() on your Interactor, which will in turn call interactor_get_seat(), and wrap the returned pointer into one of these structs. The effect is that whenever the SSH (or Rlogin) code wants to call one of those particular Seat methods, it _has_ to call interactor_announce() just beforehand, which (once I finish all of this) will make sure the user is aware of who is presenting the prompt or banner or whatever. And you can't forget to call it, because if you don't call it, then you just don't have a struct of the right type to give to the Seat method you wanted to call! (Of course, there's nothing stopping code from _deliberately_ taking a Seat * it already has and wrapping it into the new struct. In fact SshProxy has to do that, in order to forward these requests up the chain of Seats. But the point is that you can't do it _by accident_, just by forgetting to make a vital function call - when you do that, you _know_ you're doing it on purpose.) No functional change: the new interactor_announce() function exists, and the type-system trick ensures it's called in all the right places, but it doesn't actually _do_ anything yet.
2021-10-30 17:05:36 +00:00
wrap(sp->clientseat), algname, betteralgs, callback, ctx);
}
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
/*
* Otherwise, behave as if we're in batch mode: take the safest
* option.
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
*/
sshproxy_error(sp, "First host key type stored for server is %s, below "
"warning threshold. Abandoning proxy SSH connection.",
algname);
return 0;
}
static StripCtrlChars *sshproxy_stripctrl_new(
Seat *seat, BinarySink *bs_out, SeatInteractionContext sic)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
if (sp->clientseat)
return seat_stripctrl_new(sp->clientseat, bs_out, sic);
else
return NULL;
}
static void sshproxy_set_trust_status(Seat *seat, bool trusted)
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
if (sp->clientseat)
seat_set_trust_status(sp->clientseat, trusted);
}
static bool sshproxy_can_set_trust_status(Seat *seat)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
return sp->clientseat && seat_can_set_trust_status(sp->clientseat);
}
static bool sshproxy_verbose(Seat *seat)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
return sp->clientseat && seat_verbose(sp->clientseat);
}
static bool sshproxy_interactive(Seat *seat)
{
SshProxy *sp = container_of(seat, SshProxy, seat);
return sp->clientseat && seat_interactive(sp->clientseat);
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
}
static const SeatVtable SshProxy_seat_vt = {
.output = sshproxy_output,
.eof = sshproxy_eof,
New Seat callback, seat_sent(). This is used to notify the Seat that some data has been cleared from the backend's outgoing data buffer. In other words, it notifies the Seat that it might be worth calling backend_sendbuffer() again. We've never needed this before, because until now, Seats have always been the 'main program' part of the application, meaning they were also in control of the event loop. So they've been able to call backend_sendbuffer() proactively, every time they go round the event loop, instead of having to wait for a callback. But now, the SSH proxy is the first example of a Seat without privileged access to the event loop, so it has no way to find out that the backend's sendbuffer has got smaller. And without that, it can't pass that notification on to plug_sent, to unblock in turn whatever the proxied connection might have been waiting to send. In fact, before this commit, sshproxy.c never called plug_sent at all. As a result, large data uploads over an SSH jump host would hang forever as soon as the outgoing buffer filled up for the first time: the main backend (to which sshproxy.c was acting as a Socket) would carefully stop filling up the buffer, and then never receive the call to plug_sent that would cause it to start again. The new callback is ignored everywhere except in sshproxy.c. It might be a good idea to remove backend_sendbuffer() entirely and convert all previous uses of it into non-empty implementations of this callback, so that we've only got one system; but for the moment, I haven't done that.
2021-06-27 12:52:48 +00:00
.sent = sshproxy_sent,
.banner = sshproxy_banner,
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
.get_userpass_input = sshproxy_get_userpass_input,
.notify_session_started = sshproxy_notify_session_started,
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
.notify_remote_exit = nullseat_notify_remote_exit,
.notify_remote_disconnect = sshproxy_notify_remote_disconnect,
.connection_fatal = sshproxy_connection_fatal,
.update_specials_menu = nullseat_update_specials_menu,
.get_ttymode = nullseat_get_ttymode,
.set_busy_status = nullseat_set_busy_status,
Reorganise host key checking and confirmation. Previously, checking the host key against the persistent cache managed by the storage.h API was done as part of the seat_verify_ssh_host_key method, i.e. separately by each Seat. Now that check is done by verify_ssh_host_key(), which is a new function in ssh/common.c that centralises all the parts of host key checking that don't need an interactive prompt. It subsumes the previous verify_ssh_manual_host_key() that checked against the Conf, and it does the check against the storage API that each Seat was previously doing separately. If it can't confirm or definitively reject the host key by itself, _then_ it calls out to the Seat, once an interactive prompt is definitely needed. The main point of doing this is so that when SshProxy forwards a Seat call from the proxy SSH connection to the primary Seat, it won't print an announcement of which connection is involved unless it's actually going to do something interactive. (Not that we're printing those announcements _yet_ anyway, but this is a piece of groundwork that works towards doing so.) But while I'm at it, I've also taken the opportunity to clean things up a bit by renaming functions sensibly. Previously we had three very similarly named functions verify_ssh_manual_host_key(), SeatVtable's 'verify_ssh_host_key' method, and verify_host_key() in storage.h. Now the Seat method is called 'confirm' rather than 'verify' (since its job is now always to print an interactive prompt, so it looks more like the other confirm_foo methods), and the storage.h function is called check_stored_host_key(), which goes better with store_host_key and avoids having too many functions with similar names. And the 'manual' function is subsumed into the new centralised code, so there's now just *one* host key function with 'verify' in the name. Several functions are reindented in this commit. Best viewed with whitespace changes ignored.
2021-10-25 17:12:17 +00:00
.confirm_ssh_host_key = sshproxy_confirm_ssh_host_key,
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
.confirm_weak_crypto_primitive = sshproxy_confirm_weak_crypto_primitive,
.confirm_weak_cached_hostkey = sshproxy_confirm_weak_cached_hostkey,
.is_utf8 = nullseat_is_never_utf8,
.echoedit_update = nullseat_echoedit_update,
.get_x_display = nullseat_get_x_display,
.get_windowid = nullseat_get_windowid,
.get_window_pixel_size = nullseat_get_window_pixel_size,
.stripctrl_new = sshproxy_stripctrl_new,
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
.set_trust_status = sshproxy_set_trust_status,
.can_set_trust_status = sshproxy_can_set_trust_status,
New Seat query, has_mixed_input_stream(). (TL;DR: to suppress redundant 'Press Return to begin session' prompts in between hops of a jump-host configuration, in Plink.) This new query method directly asks the Seat the question: is the same stream of input used to provide responses to interactive login prompts, and the session input provided after login concludes? It's used to suppress the last-ditch anti-spoofing defence in Plink of interactively asking 'Access granted. Press Return to begin session', on the basis that any such spoofing attack works by confusing the user about what's a legit login prompt before the session begins and what's sent by the server after the main session begins - so if those two things take input from different places, the user can't be confused. This doesn't change the existing behaviour of Plink, which was already suppressing the antispoof prompt in cases where its standard input was redirected from something other than a terminal. But previously it was doing it within the can_set_trust_status() seat query, and I've now moved it out into a separate query function. The reason why these need to be separate is for SshProxy, which needs to give an unusual combination of answers when run inside Plink. For can_set_trust_status(), it needs to return whatever the parent Seat returns, so that all the login prompts for a string of proxy connections in session will be antispoofed the same way. But you only want that final 'Access granted' prompt to happen _once_, after all the proxy connection setup phases are done, because up until then you're still in the safe hands of PuTTY itself presenting an unbroken sequence of legit login prompts (even if they come from a succession of different servers). Hence, SshProxy unconditionally returns 'no' to the query of whether it has a single mixed input stream, because indeed, it never does - for purposes of session input it behaves like an always-redirected Plink, no matter what kind of real Seat it ends up sending its pre-session login prompts to.
2021-11-06 14:33:03 +00:00
.has_mixed_input_stream = nullseat_has_mixed_input_stream_no,
.verbose = sshproxy_verbose,
.interactive = sshproxy_interactive,
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
.get_cursor_position = nullseat_get_cursor_position,
};
Socket *sshproxy_new_connection(SockAddr *addr, const char *hostname,
int port, bool privport,
bool oobinline, bool nodelay, bool keepalive,
Plug *plug, Conf *clientconf,
Interactor *clientitr)
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
{
SshProxy *sp = snew(SshProxy);
memset(sp, 0, sizeof(*sp));
sp->sock.vt = &SshProxy_sock_vt;
sp->logpolicy.vt = &SshProxy_logpolicy_vt;
sp->seat.vt = &SshProxy_seat_vt;
sp->plug = plug;
psb_init(&sp->psb);
bufchain_init(&sp->ssh_to_socket);
sp->addr = addr;
sp->port = port;
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
sp->conf = conf_new();
/* Try to treat proxy_hostname as the title of a saved session. If
* that fails, set up a default Conf of our own treating it as a
* hostname. */
const char *proxy_hostname = conf_get_str(clientconf, CONF_proxy_host);
if (do_defaults(proxy_hostname, sp->conf)) {
if (!conf_launchable(sp->conf)) {
sp->errmsg = dupprintf("saved session '%s' is not launchable",
proxy_hostname);
return &sp->sock;
}
} else {
do_defaults(NULL, sp->conf);
/* In hostname mode, we default to PROT_SSH. This is more useful than
* the obvious approach of defaulting to the protocol defined in
* Default Settings, because only SSH (ok, and bare ssh-connection)
* can be used for this kind of proxy. */
conf_set_int(sp->conf, CONF_protocol, PROT_SSH);
conf_set_str(sp->conf, CONF_host, proxy_hostname);
conf_set_int(sp->conf, CONF_port,
conf_get_int(clientconf, CONF_proxy_port));
}
const char *proxy_username = conf_get_str(clientconf, CONF_proxy_username);
if (*proxy_username)
conf_set_str(sp->conf, CONF_username, proxy_username);
const struct BackendVtable *backvt = backend_vt_from_proto(
conf_get_int(sp->conf, CONF_protocol));
/*
* We don't actually need an _SSH_ session specifically: it's also
* OK to use PROT_SSHCONN, because really, the criterion is
* whether setting CONF_ssh_nc_host will do anything useful. So
* our check is for whether the backend sets the flag promising
* that it does.
*/
if (!(backvt->flags & BACKEND_SUPPORTS_NC_HOST)) {
sp->errmsg = dupprintf("saved session '%s' is not an SSH session",
proxy_hostname);
return &sp->sock;
}
/*
* We also expect that the backend will announce a willingness to
* notify us that the session has started. Any backend providing
* NC_HOST should also provide this.
*/
assert(backvt->flags & BACKEND_NOTIFIES_SESSION_START &&
"Backend provides NC_HOST without SESSION_START!");
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
/*
* Turn off SSH features we definitely don't want. It would be
* awkward and counterintuitive to have the proxy SSH connection
* become a connection-sharing upstream (but it's fine to have it
* be a downstream, if that's configured). And we don't want to
* open X forwardings, agent forwardings or (other) port
* forwardings as a side effect of this one operation.
*/
conf_set_bool(sp->conf, CONF_ssh_connection_sharing_upstream, false);
conf_set_bool(sp->conf, CONF_x11_forward, false);
conf_set_bool(sp->conf, CONF_agentfwd, false);
for (const char *subkey;
(subkey = conf_get_str_nthstrkey(sp->conf, CONF_portfwd, 0)) != NULL;)
conf_del_str_str(sp->conf, CONF_portfwd, subkey);
/*
* We'll only be running one channel through this connection
* (since we've just turned off all the other things we might have
* done with it), so we can configure it as simple.
*/
conf_set_bool(sp->conf, CONF_ssh_simple, true);
/*
* Configure the main channel of this SSH session to be a
* direct-tcpip connection to the destination host/port.
*/
conf_set_str(sp->conf, CONF_ssh_nc_host, hostname);
conf_set_int(sp->conf, CONF_ssh_nc_port, port);
sp->logctx = log_init(&sp->logpolicy, sp->conf);
char *error, *realhost;
error = backend_init(backvt, &sp->seat, &sp->backend, sp->logctx, sp->conf,
conf_get_str(sp->conf, CONF_host),
conf_get_int(sp->conf, CONF_port),
&realhost, nodelay,
conf_get_bool(sp->conf, CONF_tcp_keepalives));
if (error) {
sp->errmsg = dupprintf("unable to open SSH proxy connection: %s",
error);
return &sp->sock;
}
sfree(realhost);
/*
* If we've been given an Interactor by the caller, set ourselves
* up to work with it.
*/
if (clientitr) {
sp->clientitr = clientitr;
interactor_set_child(sp->clientitr, sp->backend->interactor);
sp->clientlp = interactor_logpolicy(clientitr);
/*
* We can only borrow the client's Seat if our own backend
* will tell us when to give it back. (SSH-based backends
* _should_ do that, but we check the flag here anyway.)
*/
if (backvt->flags & BACKEND_NOTIFIES_SESSION_START)
sp->clientseat = interactor_borrow_seat(clientitr);
}
Initial support for in-process proxy SSH connections. This introduces a new entry to the radio-button list of proxy types, in which the 'Proxy host' box is taken to be the name of an SSH server or saved session. We make an entire subsidiary SSH connection to that host, open a direct-tcpip channel through it, and use that as the connection over which to run the primary network connection. The result is basically the same as if you used a local proxy subprocess, with a command along the lines of 'plink -batch %proxyhost -nc %host:%port'. But it's all done in-process, by having an SshProxy object implement the Socket trait to talk to the main connection, and implement Seat and LogPolicy to talk to its subsidiary SSH backend. All the refactoring in recent years has got us to the point where we can do that without both SSH instances fighting over some global variable or unique piece of infrastructure. From an end user perspective, doing SSH proxying in-process like this is a little bit easier to set up: it doesn't require you to bake the full pathname of Plink into your saved session (or to have it on the system PATH), and the SshProxy setup function automatically turns off SSH features that would be inappropriate in this context, such as additional port forwardings, or acting as a connection-sharing upstream. And it has minor advantages like getting the Event Log for the subsidiary connection interleaved in the main Event Log, as if it were stderr output from a proxy subcommand, without having to deliberately configure the subsidiary Plink into verbose mode. However, this is an initial implementation only, and it doesn't yet support the _big_ payoff for doing this in-process, which (I hope) will be the ability to handle interactive prompts from the subsidiary SSH connection via the same user interface as the primary one. For example, you might need to answer two password prompts in succession, or (the first time you use a session configured this way) confirm the host keys for both proxy and destination SSH servers. Comments in the new source file discuss some design thoughts on filling in this gap. For the moment, if the proxy SSH connection encounters any situation where an interactive prompt is needed, it will make the safe assumption, the same way 'plink -batch' would do. So it's at least no _worse_ than the existing technique of putting the proxy connection in a subprocess.
2021-05-22 11:51:23 +00:00
return &sp->sock;
}