Add a general `what ports exist?' question to the FAQ, so that the

next person who asks us whether we have a port for ${random_palmtop}
can be treated with the contempt they deserve.

[originally from svn r1555]

doc/faq.but

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.19 2002/01/23 09:43:10 simon Exp $
+\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.20 2002/02/04 13:52:05 simon Exp $
 
 \A{faq} PuTTY FAQ
 
@@ -180,6 +180,20 @@ under X11 or perhaps other windowing systems, whereas Telnet Passive
 Mode is universal and shouldn't need to be specified once for each
 platform.
 
+\S{faq-ports-general}{Question} What ports of PuTTY exist?
+
+Currently, PuTTY only runs on full Win32 systems. This includes
+Windows 95, 98, and ME, and it includes Windows NT, Windows 2000 and
+Windows XP.
+
+It does \e{not} include Windows CE (see \k{faq-wince}), and it does
+not quite include the Win32s environment under Windows 3.1 (see
+\k{faq-win31}).
+
+We do not have ports for any other systems at the present time. If
+anyone told you we had a Unix port, or an iPaq port, or any other
+port of PuTTY, they were mistaken. We don't.
+
 \S{faq-wince}{Question} Will there be a port to Windows CE?
 
 Probably not in the particularly near future. Despite sharing large