1
0
mirror of https://git.tartarus.org/simon/putty.git synced 2025-01-25 01:02:24 +00:00

docs: Correct proven-primes side channel risk.

After reading Simon's wishlist write-up 'rsa-gen-side-channels'.
This commit is contained in:
Jacob Nevins 2022-01-12 01:15:55 +00:00
parent 660b8047cb
commit 7843b428ad

View File

@ -177,12 +177,14 @@ are prime, because it generates the output number together with a
proof of its primality. This takes more effort, but it eliminates that
theoretical risk in the probabilistic method.
There in one way in which PuTTYgen's proven-primes method is not
strictly better than its probable-primes method. If you use PuTTYgen
to generate RSA or DSA keys on a computer that is potentially
There in one way in which PuTTYgen's \q{proven primes} method is not
strictly better than its \q{probable primes} method. If you use
PuTTYgen to generate an RSA key on a computer that is potentially
susceptible to timing- or cache-based \i{side-channel attacks}, such
as a shared computer, the \q{probable primes} method is designed to
resist such attacks, whereas the \q{proven primes} methods are not.
(This is only a concern for RSA keys; for other key types, primes
are either not secret or not involved.)
You might choose to switch from probable to proven primes if you have
a local security standard that demands it, or if you don't trust the