a fourth class of PuTTY version tags in addition to release,
snapshot and unidentified: we now have `Custom build r1234',
indicating a build made from that SVN revision in a context other
than that of a dated snapshot. The build script generates these when
it doesn't know what else to do; `unidentified builds' will now only
occur when you run nmake from the command line.
Also, the build script now generates sensible version data in the
installer to match this. So I _think_ we should now be set to use
bob to generate installer builds of the nightly snapshots, although
of course I'll have to wait until tomorrow to test one.
[originally from svn r7211]
appears to merely fix the background colour (arranging for it to
have transparency rather than being on some kind of default grey
background), but it turns out to also fix the strange blurry
behaviour I see in the GNOME Taskbar, for no very obvious reason.
[originally from svn r7186]
inside one single uxsel front end, better to do it centrally and
avoid passing zero flags on to the front end in the first place. I'm
sure other similarly structured front ends could get confused by it
too.
[originally from svn r7171]
[r7164 == 65f9735b95]
comes last on the compiler command line. This makes it easier to
override the normal compile options (since conflicting command-line
options usually follow a last-wins policy) in order to compile (for
example) the Unix version -g -O0.
[originally from svn r7170]
want to know about any input events on a socket, it's simpler not to
call gdk_input_add() on it at all.
I hesitate to say `fixes', but ... this change _causes to go away_
the weird problem I had with blank host key dialogs. I have no
understanding of the chain of cause and effect between gdk_input_add
with zero flags and missing redraw events, but it seems like a
change I should make anyway, so I'm going to do so and hope the
problem doesn't come back :-/
[originally from svn r7164]
on 1st January except that I've had to fiddle with it a bit to take
account of r7117 having happened since then.
[originally from svn r7157]
[r7117 == 174bb7f1fd]
term_provide_resize_fn() was not being broken when the back end was
destroyed on session termination, causing resizing an inactive PuTTY
to be a segfault hazard.
[originally from svn r7143]
which have been broken since r6797.
(At least some versions of Win9x are gratuitously picky about the arguments to
CreateThread(), requiring lpThreadId not to be NULL.)
[originally from svn r7132]
[r6797 == 291533d3f9]
It's specific to the Windows installer, so it seems unnecessarily confusing to
have it in the top level of the source distribution alongside README.
[originally from svn r7125]
will close the window even in `close window only on clean exit'
mode. Also, while I'm here, arrange a suitable exit code for
"exit-signal".
[originally from svn r7121]
quite big and tends to hide the existence of the `Serial' config
panel.
This is implemented by folding up every branch of depth 2 or more,
which with any luck might turn out to be general enough to carry
over unchanged if other branches start expanding. Then again, we may
have to fiddle with it again when that time comes; who knows?
[originally from svn r7117]
subprocess. They were intended to make sure the child process didn't
inherit anything embarrassing or inconvenient from us, such as the
master end of its own pty, but now we instead do this by making sure
to set all our own fds to not-FD_CLOEXEC on creation. This should
fix Debian bug #357520.
(This doesn't seem to work _quite_ right in uxproxy.c's invocation
of a local proxy command: both ends of a GTK internal pipe end up in
the child process's fd space. This appears to be another GTK 1 bug,
inasmuch as it goes away when I build with Colin's preliminary GTK 2
patch; for the moment I think leaving that pipe lying around is
probably less harmful than hampering the proxy process's ability to
use extra fds by prior arrangement with PuTTY's parent process.)
[originally from svn r7107]
about it very hard; it's a plausible fix for the observed cause of the extreme
CPU usage, being that we were asking to be notified of Windows messages and
then not dealing with them, plausibly leading to a loop. Works for me,
anyway.)
[originally from svn r7098]
